Equipamento de Proteção Individual: Causa ou Consequência? Caso Clínico

Introduction Contact dermatitis comprises 70–90% of all occupational skin diseases, leading frequently to functional disability. If contact dermatitis is suspected, the patient’s occupational history can guide the clinical suspicion as well as the allergens to be tested. Case Report A 63-year-old male electrician, who went to a Dermatology Specialist with pruritic erythematous-scaly lesions on the hands and feet, two years after the onset of symptoms. An epicutaneous test was performed, and Potassium Dichromate, Paraphenylenediamine, Lanolin Alcohols and Textile Blends were found positive. Considering the characteristics of the lesions, their distribution, occupational exposure and the results of skin patch tests, the diagnosis of Allergic Contact Dermatitis was established. Discussion It was possible to establish a relationship between the Personal Protective Equipment used by the worker and the symptoms, as well as establish the presumptive diagnosis of Occupational Dermatitis. The best approach for treatment is to identify and remove the agent, since avoiding the allergens can improve the clinical condition. Workplace analysis, as well as the development of preventive strategies are essential for Occupational Health. It is important to encourage companies to reduce/eliminate exposure to risk factors, promoting the health and safety of workers. Conclusion Contact Dermatitis is associated with a high personal and professional impacts, which can result in absenteeism, reduced productivity and disability. The Occupational Health Care Physician plays an active role in informing workers, with regards to safe working practices and the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment, so that these are used for protection instead of the source of the illness. Keywords: Dermatitis, Allergic contact, Contact Dermatitis; Occupational Dermatitis; Occupational Health.