面向云计算中任务感知和资源感知的任务调度:实验对比评价

Muhammad Ibrahim, S. Nabi, A. Baz, Nasir Naveed, H. Alhakami
{"title":"面向云计算中任务感知和资源感知的任务调度:实验对比评价","authors":"Muhammad Ibrahim, S. Nabi, A. Baz, Nasir Naveed, H. Alhakami","doi":"10.2991/ijndc.k.200515.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing has been considered as one of the large-scale platforms that support various types of services including compute, storage, compute, and analytic to the users and organizations with high agility, scalability, and resiliency intact. The users of the Cloud are increasing at an enormous rate which also resulted in issues related to handling and scheduling the users’ requested workload effectively and efficiently on the available Cloud resources. The aim of the Cloud service providers is to maximize resource utilization and in turn increased revenue generation. In the last few years, Cloud Task scheduling has been considered as an important area of research for the researchers. As different scheduling heuristics are associated with different underlying assumptions; thus, performing a precise comparison cannot be guaranteed. This work empirically compares and provides an insight into the performance of some renown state-of-the-art task scheduling heuristics concerning the Makespan, average resource utilization ratio, Throughput. Those approaches include task-aware, resource-aware, and some hybrid approaches. The experiments were then extended by evaluating the performance using average response time for all the compared approaches. The simulation experiments are conducted by utilizing HCSP and GOCJ benchmark datasets using CloudSim a renowned simulation tool for Cloud. Based on the findings of the comparative analysis and results discussion, we have highlighted some important aspects of the underlying approaches and for future work we will propose a task-cum-resource aware task scheduling approach.","PeriodicalId":318936,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Task and Resource Aware Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing: An Experimental Comparative Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ibrahim, S. Nabi, A. Baz, Nasir Naveed, H. Alhakami\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ijndc.k.200515.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cloud computing has been considered as one of the large-scale platforms that support various types of services including compute, storage, compute, and analytic to the users and organizations with high agility, scalability, and resiliency intact. The users of the Cloud are increasing at an enormous rate which also resulted in issues related to handling and scheduling the users’ requested workload effectively and efficiently on the available Cloud resources. The aim of the Cloud service providers is to maximize resource utilization and in turn increased revenue generation. In the last few years, Cloud Task scheduling has been considered as an important area of research for the researchers. As different scheduling heuristics are associated with different underlying assumptions; thus, performing a precise comparison cannot be guaranteed. This work empirically compares and provides an insight into the performance of some renown state-of-the-art task scheduling heuristics concerning the Makespan, average resource utilization ratio, Throughput. Those approaches include task-aware, resource-aware, and some hybrid approaches. The experiments were then extended by evaluating the performance using average response time for all the compared approaches. The simulation experiments are conducted by utilizing HCSP and GOCJ benchmark datasets using CloudSim a renowned simulation tool for Cloud. Based on the findings of the comparative analysis and results discussion, we have highlighted some important aspects of the underlying approaches and for future work we will propose a task-cum-resource aware task scheduling approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ijndc.k.200515.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ijndc.k.200515.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

云计算被认为是一种大规模的平台,它支持各种类型的服务,包括计算、存储、计算和分析,为用户和组织提供高敏捷性、可伸缩性和弹性。云的用户正在以惊人的速度增长,这也导致了在可用的云资源上有效和高效地处理和调度用户请求的工作负载相关的问题。云服务提供商的目标是最大限度地利用资源,从而增加收入。在过去的几年里,云任务调度已经被认为是研究人员的一个重要领域。由于不同的调度启发式与不同的潜在假设相关联;因此,不能保证执行精确的比较。这项工作在经验上比较了一些著名的最先进的任务调度启发式算法的性能,并提供了有关Makespan,平均资源利用率,吞吐量的见解。这些方法包括任务感知、资源感知和一些混合方法。然后通过使用所有比较方法的平均响应时间评估性能来扩展实验。仿真实验利用HCSP和GOCJ基准数据集,使用CloudSim(著名的云模拟工具)进行。基于比较分析和结果讨论的结果,我们强调了基础方法的一些重要方面,并为未来的工作,我们将提出一种任务和资源感知的任务调度方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a Task and Resource Aware Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing: An Experimental Comparative Evaluation
Cloud computing has been considered as one of the large-scale platforms that support various types of services including compute, storage, compute, and analytic to the users and organizations with high agility, scalability, and resiliency intact. The users of the Cloud are increasing at an enormous rate which also resulted in issues related to handling and scheduling the users’ requested workload effectively and efficiently on the available Cloud resources. The aim of the Cloud service providers is to maximize resource utilization and in turn increased revenue generation. In the last few years, Cloud Task scheduling has been considered as an important area of research for the researchers. As different scheduling heuristics are associated with different underlying assumptions; thus, performing a precise comparison cannot be guaranteed. This work empirically compares and provides an insight into the performance of some renown state-of-the-art task scheduling heuristics concerning the Makespan, average resource utilization ratio, Throughput. Those approaches include task-aware, resource-aware, and some hybrid approaches. The experiments were then extended by evaluating the performance using average response time for all the compared approaches. The simulation experiments are conducted by utilizing HCSP and GOCJ benchmark datasets using CloudSim a renowned simulation tool for Cloud. Based on the findings of the comparative analysis and results discussion, we have highlighted some important aspects of the underlying approaches and for future work we will propose a task-cum-resource aware task scheduling approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Parameter Tuning for Constructing Storage Tiers in an Autonomous Distributed Storage System Application of 2‑gram and 3‑gram to Obtain Factor Scores of Statements Posted at Q&A Sites Bountychain: Toward Decentralizing a Bug Bounty Program with Blockchain and IPFS Secure Communications by Tit-for-Tat Strategy in Vehicular Networks Vehicle Platooning Systems: Review, Classification and Validation Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1