高跨境流动性条件下个人在俄税务居住

E. Kilinkarova
{"title":"高跨境流动性条件下个人在俄税务居住","authors":"E. Kilinkarova","doi":"10.18572/1811-1475-2023-4-40-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores rules on tax residence of individuals as set in the Russian nation legislation and double tax treaties. The author comes to the conclusion that in the context of high cross-border mobility of individuals the current Russian legal regulation of tax residence does not adequately protect the fiscal interests of the state, since it uses a criterion that allows taxpayers to choose if they want to be Russian tax residents or not in the current tax period and lose their tax resident status while maintaining real personal, social and economic ties with the state. At the same time the introduction of new criteria should not be based on blind copying of the experience of foreign countries or the provisions of double tax treaties, and the new rules should use unambiguous wording. In particular, if the terms “availability of a permanent home” or “centre of vital interests” are introduced to national legislation, their meaning should be explicitly defined.","PeriodicalId":210234,"journal":{"name":"Juridical World","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Residency of Individuals in Russia in the Conditions of High Transborder Mobility\",\"authors\":\"E. Kilinkarova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1811-1475-2023-4-40-44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article explores rules on tax residence of individuals as set in the Russian nation legislation and double tax treaties. The author comes to the conclusion that in the context of high cross-border mobility of individuals the current Russian legal regulation of tax residence does not adequately protect the fiscal interests of the state, since it uses a criterion that allows taxpayers to choose if they want to be Russian tax residents or not in the current tax period and lose their tax resident status while maintaining real personal, social and economic ties with the state. At the same time the introduction of new criteria should not be based on blind copying of the experience of foreign countries or the provisions of double tax treaties, and the new rules should use unambiguous wording. In particular, if the terms “availability of a permanent home” or “centre of vital interests” are introduced to national legislation, their meaning should be explicitly defined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical World\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1811-1475-2023-4-40-44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1811-1475-2023-4-40-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了俄罗斯国家立法和双重征税协定中关于个人税收居住的规定。作者得出的结论是,在个人高度跨境流动的背景下,目前俄罗斯对税收居民的法律规定并不能充分保护国家的财政利益,因为它使用了一个标准,允许纳税人选择是否想成为俄罗斯税收居民,或者在当前纳税期间不成为俄罗斯税收居民,并在保持与国家的实际个人、社会和经济联系的同时失去其税收居民身份。同时,新标准的出台不应盲目照搬外国经验或避免双重征税协定的规定,新规则应使用明确的措辞。特别是,如果在国家立法中提出“提供永久住所”或“重要利益中心”等词,则应明确界定其含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tax Residency of Individuals in Russia in the Conditions of High Transborder Mobility
The article explores rules on tax residence of individuals as set in the Russian nation legislation and double tax treaties. The author comes to the conclusion that in the context of high cross-border mobility of individuals the current Russian legal regulation of tax residence does not adequately protect the fiscal interests of the state, since it uses a criterion that allows taxpayers to choose if they want to be Russian tax residents or not in the current tax period and lose their tax resident status while maintaining real personal, social and economic ties with the state. At the same time the introduction of new criteria should not be based on blind copying of the experience of foreign countries or the provisions of double tax treaties, and the new rules should use unambiguous wording. In particular, if the terms “availability of a permanent home” or “centre of vital interests” are introduced to national legislation, their meaning should be explicitly defined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cosplay, Costumed Characters and Other Gray Profit Generation Means at Use of a Part of Other Person’s Work Plagiarism, Borrowing and Legitimate Use: The Concept Demarcation Problem The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Healthcare: Ethical and Legal Issues Migration Processes in Present-Day Russia: State and Development Prospects Destructive Aspects of Reception: Issues of the Theory and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1