{"title":"弗里德里希·尼采，《摩奴法典》与立法艺术","authors":"R. Berkowitz","doi":"10.5840/NEWNIETZSCHE2005/20066/73/4/1/213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political and legal theorists ask the question: What should law be? In so doing, they implicitly or explicitly overlook what law is. This preference for the normative as opposed to the ontological approach to law is rooted in the assumption that law serves social and political ends. Indeed, in deference to its normative interests, legal scholarship has embraced a diversity of social sciences to assist in the discovery of","PeriodicalId":344710,"journal":{"name":"New Nietzsche Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Friedrich Nietzsche, The Code of Manu, and the Art of Legislation\",\"authors\":\"R. Berkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/NEWNIETZSCHE2005/20066/73/4/1/213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political and legal theorists ask the question: What should law be? In so doing, they implicitly or explicitly overlook what law is. This preference for the normative as opposed to the ontological approach to law is rooted in the assumption that law serves social and political ends. Indeed, in deference to its normative interests, legal scholarship has embraced a diversity of social sciences to assist in the discovery of\",\"PeriodicalId\":344710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Nietzsche Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Nietzsche Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/NEWNIETZSCHE2005/20066/73/4/1/213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Nietzsche Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/NEWNIETZSCHE2005/20066/73/4/1/213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Code of Manu, and the Art of Legislation
Political and legal theorists ask the question: What should law be? In so doing, they implicitly or explicitly overlook what law is. This preference for the normative as opposed to the ontological approach to law is rooted in the assumption that law serves social and political ends. Indeed, in deference to its normative interests, legal scholarship has embraced a diversity of social sciences to assist in the discovery of
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
