评估上下文敏感的切片和斩切

J. Krinke
{"title":"评估上下文敏感的切片和斩切","authors":"J. Krinke","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2002.1167744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an empirical evaluation of three context-sensitive slicing algorithms and five context-sensitive chopping algorithms, and compare them to context-insensitive methods. Besides the algorithms by Reps et al. (1994, 1995) and Agrawal (2001) we investigate six new algorithms based on variations of k-limited call strings and approximative chopping based on summary information. It turns out that chopping based on summary information may have a prohibitive complexity, and that approximate algorithms are almost as precise and much faster.","PeriodicalId":385190,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating context-sensitive slicing and chopping\",\"authors\":\"J. Krinke\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.2002.1167744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present an empirical evaluation of three context-sensitive slicing algorithms and five context-sensitive chopping algorithms, and compare them to context-insensitive methods. Besides the algorithms by Reps et al. (1994, 1995) and Agrawal (2001) we investigate six new algorithms based on variations of k-limited call strings and approximative chopping based on summary information. It turns out that chopping based on summary information may have a prohibitive complexity, and that approximate algorithms are almost as precise and much faster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2002.1167744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2002.1167744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

我们提出了三种上下文敏感的切片算法和五种上下文敏感的切割算法的经验评估,并将它们与上下文不敏感的方法进行比较。除了rep等人(1994,1995)和Agrawal(2001)的算法外,我们还研究了六种基于k限制呼叫字符串变化和基于摘要信息的近似截断的新算法。事实证明,基于汇总信息的切割可能具有令人望而却步的复杂性,而近似算法几乎同样精确,而且速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating context-sensitive slicing and chopping
We present an empirical evaluation of three context-sensitive slicing algorithms and five context-sensitive chopping algorithms, and compare them to context-insensitive methods. Besides the algorithms by Reps et al. (1994, 1995) and Agrawal (2001) we investigate six new algorithms based on variations of k-limited call strings and approximative chopping based on summary information. It turns out that chopping based on summary information may have a prohibitive complexity, and that approximate algorithms are almost as precise and much faster.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An algorithm to compare OO-conceptual schemas From legacy to Web through interaction modeling Union slices for program maintenance Putting escape analysis to work for software testing Corrective Maintenance Maturity Model: Problem Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1