使用GAP基准套件评估图形分析框架

A. Azad, M. Aznaveh, S. Beamer, Mark P. Blanco, Jinhao Chen, Luke D'Alessandro, Roshan Dathathri, Tim Davis, Kevin Deweese, J. Firoz, H. Gabb, G. Gill, Bálint Hegyi, Scott P. Kolodziej, Tze Meng Low, A. Lumsdaine, Tugsbayasgalan Manlaibaatar, T. Mattson, Scott McMillan, R. Peri, K. Pingali, Upasana Sridhar, Gábor Szárnyas, Yunming Zhang, Yongzhe Zhang
{"title":"使用GAP基准套件评估图形分析框架","authors":"A. Azad, M. Aznaveh, S. Beamer, Mark P. Blanco, Jinhao Chen, Luke D'Alessandro, Roshan Dathathri, Tim Davis, Kevin Deweese, J. Firoz, H. Gabb, G. Gill, Bálint Hegyi, Scott P. Kolodziej, Tze Meng Low, A. Lumsdaine, Tugsbayasgalan Manlaibaatar, T. Mattson, Scott McMillan, R. Peri, K. Pingali, Upasana Sridhar, Gábor Szárnyas, Yunming Zhang, Yongzhe Zhang","doi":"10.1109/IISWC50251.2020.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graphs play a key role in data analytics. Graphs and the software systems used to work with them are highly diverse. Algorithms interact with hardware in different ways and which graph solution works best on a given platform changes with the structure of the graph. This makes it difficult to decide which graph programming framework is the best for a given situation. In this paper, we try to make sense of this diverse landscape. We evaluate five different frameworks for graph analytics: SuiteS-parse GraphBLAS, Galois, the NWGraph library, the Graph Kernel Collection, and GraphIt. We use the GAP Benchmark Suite to evaluate each framework. GAP consists of 30 tests: six graph algorithms (breadth-first search, single-source shortest path, PageRank, betweenness centrality, connected components, and triangle counting) on five graphs. The GAP Benchmark Suite includes high-performance reference implementations to provide a performance baseline for comparison. Our results show the relative strengths of each framework, but also serve as a case study for the challenges of establishing objective measures for comparing graph frameworks.","PeriodicalId":365983,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Graph Analytics Frameworks Using the GAP Benchmark Suite\",\"authors\":\"A. Azad, M. Aznaveh, S. Beamer, Mark P. Blanco, Jinhao Chen, Luke D'Alessandro, Roshan Dathathri, Tim Davis, Kevin Deweese, J. Firoz, H. Gabb, G. Gill, Bálint Hegyi, Scott P. Kolodziej, Tze Meng Low, A. Lumsdaine, Tugsbayasgalan Manlaibaatar, T. Mattson, Scott McMillan, R. Peri, K. Pingali, Upasana Sridhar, Gábor Szárnyas, Yunming Zhang, Yongzhe Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IISWC50251.2020.00029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Graphs play a key role in data analytics. Graphs and the software systems used to work with them are highly diverse. Algorithms interact with hardware in different ways and which graph solution works best on a given platform changes with the structure of the graph. This makes it difficult to decide which graph programming framework is the best for a given situation. In this paper, we try to make sense of this diverse landscape. We evaluate five different frameworks for graph analytics: SuiteS-parse GraphBLAS, Galois, the NWGraph library, the Graph Kernel Collection, and GraphIt. We use the GAP Benchmark Suite to evaluate each framework. GAP consists of 30 tests: six graph algorithms (breadth-first search, single-source shortest path, PageRank, betweenness centrality, connected components, and triangle counting) on five graphs. The GAP Benchmark Suite includes high-performance reference implementations to provide a performance baseline for comparison. Our results show the relative strengths of each framework, but also serve as a case study for the challenges of establishing objective measures for comparing graph frameworks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC50251.2020.00029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC50251.2020.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

图在数据分析中起着关键作用。图形和用于处理它们的软件系统是高度多样化的。算法以不同的方式与硬件交互,哪个图形解决方案在给定的平台上工作得最好随着图形结构的变化而变化。这使得决定哪个图形编程框架最适合给定情况变得困难。在本文中,我们试图理解这种多样化的景观。我们评估了五种不同的图形分析框架:套件解析GraphBLAS、Galois、NWGraph库、graph Kernel Collection和GraphIt。我们使用GAP基准测试套件来评估每个框架。GAP由30个测试组成:5个图上的6个图算法(宽度优先搜索、单源最短路径、PageRank、中间性中心性、连接组件和三角形计数)。GAP基准测试套件包括高性能参考实现,以提供用于比较的性能基线。我们的结果显示了每个框架的相对优势,但也作为一个案例研究,为比较图框架建立客观的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Graph Analytics Frameworks Using the GAP Benchmark Suite
Graphs play a key role in data analytics. Graphs and the software systems used to work with them are highly diverse. Algorithms interact with hardware in different ways and which graph solution works best on a given platform changes with the structure of the graph. This makes it difficult to decide which graph programming framework is the best for a given situation. In this paper, we try to make sense of this diverse landscape. We evaluate five different frameworks for graph analytics: SuiteS-parse GraphBLAS, Galois, the NWGraph library, the Graph Kernel Collection, and GraphIt. We use the GAP Benchmark Suite to evaluate each framework. GAP consists of 30 tests: six graph algorithms (breadth-first search, single-source shortest path, PageRank, betweenness centrality, connected components, and triangle counting) on five graphs. The GAP Benchmark Suite includes high-performance reference implementations to provide a performance baseline for comparison. Our results show the relative strengths of each framework, but also serve as a case study for the challenges of establishing objective measures for comparing graph frameworks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizing Committee : IISWC 2020 Characterizing the impact of last-level cache replacement policies on big-data workloads AI on the Edge: Characterizing AI-based IoT Applications Using Specialized Edge Architectures Empirical Analysis and Modeling of Compute Times of CNN Operations on AWS Cloud Reliability Modeling of NISQ- Era Quantum Computers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1