1970年代台湾外交政策:适应与生存的个案研究

Thomas J. Bellows
{"title":"1970年代台湾外交政策:适应与生存的个案研究","authors":"Thomas J. Bellows","doi":"10.2307/2643160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A SERIES OF diplomatic-political setbacks in the early 1970s suggested that Taiwan-i.e., the Republic of China (ROC)would progressively suffer political isolation. The political isolation would lead to economic and cultural isolation, and the viability and independent status of Taiwan would draw to a close. A nadir of sorts occurred when the ROC walked out of the U.N. General Assembly on October 25, 1971. A motion to declare the expulsion of Taiwan an \"important question,\" requiring a two-thirds vote, failed by a four-vote margin (55 to 59, 15 abstentions). Taiwan's position was not helped by the fact that Henry Kissinger, then Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, was on his second visit to Peking at the time the General Assembly debated the China question. Immediately after the vote, the ROC Foreign Minister, Chou Shu-kai, announced that his government \"would not take part in any further proceedings of the General Assembly.\" Since the admission of the People's Republic of China (PRC) to the United Nations, there have been efforts to relegate the ROC to the status of a non-country. It is no longer included in any U.N. statistical reports. The most visible reminder of the ROC's earlier membership, a marble plaque carrying a quotation from Confucius that was a gift of the ROC, was quietly removed in August 1972. A New York Times editorial pointedly assessed the practical absurdity of such actions:","PeriodicalId":199560,"journal":{"name":"Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taiwan's Foreign Policy in the 1970s: a Case Study of Adaptation and Viability\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Bellows\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2643160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A SERIES OF diplomatic-political setbacks in the early 1970s suggested that Taiwan-i.e., the Republic of China (ROC)would progressively suffer political isolation. The political isolation would lead to economic and cultural isolation, and the viability and independent status of Taiwan would draw to a close. A nadir of sorts occurred when the ROC walked out of the U.N. General Assembly on October 25, 1971. A motion to declare the expulsion of Taiwan an \\\"important question,\\\" requiring a two-thirds vote, failed by a four-vote margin (55 to 59, 15 abstentions). Taiwan's position was not helped by the fact that Henry Kissinger, then Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, was on his second visit to Peking at the time the General Assembly debated the China question. Immediately after the vote, the ROC Foreign Minister, Chou Shu-kai, announced that his government \\\"would not take part in any further proceedings of the General Assembly.\\\" Since the admission of the People's Republic of China (PRC) to the United Nations, there have been efforts to relegate the ROC to the status of a non-country. It is no longer included in any U.N. statistical reports. The most visible reminder of the ROC's earlier membership, a marble plaque carrying a quotation from Confucius that was a gift of the ROC, was quietly removed in August 1972. A New York Times editorial pointedly assessed the practical absurdity of such actions:\",\"PeriodicalId\":199560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2643160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2643160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

20世纪70年代初的一系列外交和政治挫折表明,台湾——即美国。中华民国(中华民国)将逐渐遭受政治孤立。政治上的孤立将导致经济和文化上的孤立,台湾的生存能力和独立地位将走向终结。1971年10月25日,当中华民国退出联合国大会时,出现了某种最低点。一项要求三分之二投票通过的将台湾驱逐出境的议案以四票之差(55票对59票,15票弃权)未能通过。在联合国大会就中国问题进行辩论时,时任美国总统国家安全事务助理的亨利·基辛格(Henry Kissinger)正在第二次访问北京,这一事实无助于台湾的立场。投票后,中华民国外交部长周树凯立即宣布,他的政府“不会参加联合国大会的任何进一步的程序”。自从中华人民共和国加入联合国以来,一直有人试图将中华民国贬为非国家地位。它不再包括在任何联合国统计报告中。1972年8月,中华民国作为礼物,一块刻有孔子语录的大理石牌匾被悄悄移走,这是中华民国早期成员身份最明显的标志。《纽约时报》的一篇社论尖锐地评价了这种行为的实际荒谬性:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taiwan's Foreign Policy in the 1970s: a Case Study of Adaptation and Viability
A SERIES OF diplomatic-political setbacks in the early 1970s suggested that Taiwan-i.e., the Republic of China (ROC)would progressively suffer political isolation. The political isolation would lead to economic and cultural isolation, and the viability and independent status of Taiwan would draw to a close. A nadir of sorts occurred when the ROC walked out of the U.N. General Assembly on October 25, 1971. A motion to declare the expulsion of Taiwan an "important question," requiring a two-thirds vote, failed by a four-vote margin (55 to 59, 15 abstentions). Taiwan's position was not helped by the fact that Henry Kissinger, then Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, was on his second visit to Peking at the time the General Assembly debated the China question. Immediately after the vote, the ROC Foreign Minister, Chou Shu-kai, announced that his government "would not take part in any further proceedings of the General Assembly." Since the admission of the People's Republic of China (PRC) to the United Nations, there have been efforts to relegate the ROC to the status of a non-country. It is no longer included in any U.N. statistical reports. The most visible reminder of the ROC's earlier membership, a marble plaque carrying a quotation from Confucius that was a gift of the ROC, was quietly removed in August 1972. A New York Times editorial pointedly assessed the practical absurdity of such actions:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Nationalist Ideology of the Chinese Military The Bamboo Gulag: Human Rights in the People's Republic of China, 1991-1992 The Dragon and the Eagle - a Study of U.S. - China Relations in Civil Air Transport A Comparative Study of Judicial Review under Nationalist Chinese and American Constitutional Law Taiwan's Foreign Policy in the 1970s: a Case Study of Adaptation and Viability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1