预测水泥或石灰加固红土搅拌后压实时限的多项式模型

U. N. Okonkwo, E. Ekeoma, Linus Owo Eleke
{"title":"预测水泥或石灰加固红土搅拌后压实时限的多项式模型","authors":"U. N. Okonkwo, E. Ekeoma, Linus Owo Eleke","doi":"10.33736/jcest.4918.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demand for natural aggregates has increased in recent years because of diverse environmental interests. Consequently, its cost has soared astronomically and the utilization of lateritic soil for low-cost roads has been an attractive option. In most cases during road construction, unprecedented conditions may lead to delays in the compaction of the treated soil after the mixing operation and placing had taken place. Thus, this study developed polynomial models for predicting time limits for compaction after mixing operation within 0-180 minutes at 30 minutes intervals for lateritic soil reinforced with cement and lime. The percentage contents by weight of the dry soil for cement or quick lime mixed with the soil were 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10%. Consistency indices tests and particle size analysis were carried out on the untreated lateritic soil for characterization. The tests conducted on the lateritic soil prepared with cement and quick lime were compaction test (Standard Proctor), California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of 7 days curing. The AASHTO soil classification system and Unified Soil Classification system rated the lateritic soil to be A-6(13) and clayey soil (CL), respectively. Ordinarily, the lateritic soil was found to be a poor construction soil and therefore requires treatment to improve its strength in order to make it useful for pavement purposes. At the increase in time limits for compaction after mixing, there were reductions in compaction and strength characteristics of the lateritic soils that were prepared with cement or lime. The polynomial models developed were a good fit for predicting time limits for compaction after mixing using cement/lime contents, compaction and strength characteristics of the strengthened soil. The polynomial models gave coefficients of correlation and determination of 0.988 and 0.976, respectively, when the soil was prepared with cement whereas, in the case of lime-prepared soil, the values were 0.966 and 0.933, respectively. The cement/lime contents, optimum moisture content (OMC), CBR and UCS (7 days curing) were entirely statistically significant in predicting time limits for compaction after mixing at a 95% confidence level.","PeriodicalId":346729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLYNOMIAL MODELS FOR PREDICTING TIME LIMITS FOR COMPACTION AFTER MIXING OPERATION OF LATERITIC SOIL REINFORCED USING CEMENT OR LIME\",\"authors\":\"U. N. Okonkwo, E. Ekeoma, Linus Owo Eleke\",\"doi\":\"10.33736/jcest.4918.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The demand for natural aggregates has increased in recent years because of diverse environmental interests. Consequently, its cost has soared astronomically and the utilization of lateritic soil for low-cost roads has been an attractive option. In most cases during road construction, unprecedented conditions may lead to delays in the compaction of the treated soil after the mixing operation and placing had taken place. Thus, this study developed polynomial models for predicting time limits for compaction after mixing operation within 0-180 minutes at 30 minutes intervals for lateritic soil reinforced with cement and lime. The percentage contents by weight of the dry soil for cement or quick lime mixed with the soil were 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10%. Consistency indices tests and particle size analysis were carried out on the untreated lateritic soil for characterization. The tests conducted on the lateritic soil prepared with cement and quick lime were compaction test (Standard Proctor), California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of 7 days curing. The AASHTO soil classification system and Unified Soil Classification system rated the lateritic soil to be A-6(13) and clayey soil (CL), respectively. Ordinarily, the lateritic soil was found to be a poor construction soil and therefore requires treatment to improve its strength in order to make it useful for pavement purposes. At the increase in time limits for compaction after mixing, there were reductions in compaction and strength characteristics of the lateritic soils that were prepared with cement or lime. The polynomial models developed were a good fit for predicting time limits for compaction after mixing using cement/lime contents, compaction and strength characteristics of the strengthened soil. The polynomial models gave coefficients of correlation and determination of 0.988 and 0.976, respectively, when the soil was prepared with cement whereas, in the case of lime-prepared soil, the values were 0.966 and 0.933, respectively. The cement/lime contents, optimum moisture content (OMC), CBR and UCS (7 days curing) were entirely statistically significant in predicting time limits for compaction after mixing at a 95% confidence level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.4918.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.4918.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,由于环境利益的多样化,对天然骨料的需求有所增加。因此,其成本急剧上升,利用红土建造低成本道路是一个有吸引力的选择。在大多数情况下,在道路施工过程中,前所未有的条件可能导致在混合操作和放置后处理过的土壤的压实延迟。因此,本研究建立了多项式模型,用于预测水泥和石灰加固红土混合后0-180分钟内每隔30分钟的压实时限。干土中水泥和生石灰的重量含量分别为2、4、6、8、10%。对未经处理的红土进行了稠度指标试验和粒度分析。对水泥和生石灰制备的红土进行了压实试验(Standard Proctor)、加州承载比试验(CBR)和养护7天的无侧限抗压强度试验(UCS)。AASHTO土壤分类系统和统一土壤分类系统分别将红土土评为A-6级(13级)和粘土土(CL级)。通常,红土被认为是一种较差的建筑土,因此需要处理以提高其强度,使其可用于路面用途。随着搅拌后压实时限的增加,用水泥或石灰制备的红土的压实度和强度特性有所降低。所建立的多项式模型可以很好地利用水泥/石灰含量、压实度和加固土的强度特性来预测搅拌后的压实时限。多项式模型的相关系数和确定系数分别为0.988和0.976,而石灰土的相关系数和确定系数分别为0.966和0.933。水泥/石灰含量、最佳含水率(OMC)、CBR和UCS(7天养护)在预测混合后压实时限方面具有完全统计学意义(95%置信度)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
POLYNOMIAL MODELS FOR PREDICTING TIME LIMITS FOR COMPACTION AFTER MIXING OPERATION OF LATERITIC SOIL REINFORCED USING CEMENT OR LIME
The demand for natural aggregates has increased in recent years because of diverse environmental interests. Consequently, its cost has soared astronomically and the utilization of lateritic soil for low-cost roads has been an attractive option. In most cases during road construction, unprecedented conditions may lead to delays in the compaction of the treated soil after the mixing operation and placing had taken place. Thus, this study developed polynomial models for predicting time limits for compaction after mixing operation within 0-180 minutes at 30 minutes intervals for lateritic soil reinforced with cement and lime. The percentage contents by weight of the dry soil for cement or quick lime mixed with the soil were 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10%. Consistency indices tests and particle size analysis were carried out on the untreated lateritic soil for characterization. The tests conducted on the lateritic soil prepared with cement and quick lime were compaction test (Standard Proctor), California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of 7 days curing. The AASHTO soil classification system and Unified Soil Classification system rated the lateritic soil to be A-6(13) and clayey soil (CL), respectively. Ordinarily, the lateritic soil was found to be a poor construction soil and therefore requires treatment to improve its strength in order to make it useful for pavement purposes. At the increase in time limits for compaction after mixing, there were reductions in compaction and strength characteristics of the lateritic soils that were prepared with cement or lime. The polynomial models developed were a good fit for predicting time limits for compaction after mixing using cement/lime contents, compaction and strength characteristics of the strengthened soil. The polynomial models gave coefficients of correlation and determination of 0.988 and 0.976, respectively, when the soil was prepared with cement whereas, in the case of lime-prepared soil, the values were 0.966 and 0.933, respectively. The cement/lime contents, optimum moisture content (OMC), CBR and UCS (7 days curing) were entirely statistically significant in predicting time limits for compaction after mixing at a 95% confidence level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RETRACTION NOTE TO: ASSESSING SEISMIC SOIL LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL USING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH EFFECT OF ADDITION OF CaO ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HIGH-VOLUME FLY ASH CONCRETE EDITORIAL SCOPE – WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RECYCLING MATLAB PROGRAM FOR RATING SOILS BASED ON ENGINEERING BEHAVIOURS NONLINEAR LATERAL RESPONSE OF PILE GROUP IN CLAY USING THE MODIFIED CAM CLAY SOIL MODEL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1