排序算法选择及其能量效率的经验和指南

Maximilian Meissner, Supriya Kamthania, Nishant Rawtani, James Bucek, K. Lange, Samuel Kounev
{"title":"排序算法选择及其能量效率的经验和指南","authors":"Maximilian Meissner, Supriya Kamthania, Nishant Rawtani, James Bucek, K. Lange, Samuel Kounev","doi":"10.1145/3491204.3527468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy efficiency has become a major concern in the IT sector as the energy demand for data centers is projected to reach 1PWh per year by 2030. While hardware designers improve the energy efficiency of their products, software developers often do not consider or are unaware of the impact their design choices can make on the energy consumption caused by the execution of their applications. Energy efficiency improvements in applications can, to a certain extent, be achieved through compiler optimizations. Nonetheless, software developers should still make reasonable design choices to improve energy efficiency further. In this paper, we present the energy efficiency of common sorting algorithms under different pre-sorted conditions. Previous work in this field considered only randomized data. We expand on this previous work and measure the sorting algorithms' energy efficiency when the data is already partially sorted to 20% and 50%. Our presented experience is a case study intended to demonstrate the effect simple design choices, such as the selection of algorithm as well as its implementation, can make on energy efficiency. It is intended for industry practitioners to aid them in selecting a more energy-efficient algorithm for their problems at hand through helpful guidelines. Our results also can function as an incentive to make energy efficiency a non-functional requirement for tenders, and as a motivation for researchers to include energy efficiency as an additional quality criterion when studying the properties of algorithms.","PeriodicalId":129216,"journal":{"name":"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering","volume":"287 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience and Guidelines for Sorting Algorithm Choices and Their Energy Efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Meissner, Supriya Kamthania, Nishant Rawtani, James Bucek, K. Lange, Samuel Kounev\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3491204.3527468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Energy efficiency has become a major concern in the IT sector as the energy demand for data centers is projected to reach 1PWh per year by 2030. While hardware designers improve the energy efficiency of their products, software developers often do not consider or are unaware of the impact their design choices can make on the energy consumption caused by the execution of their applications. Energy efficiency improvements in applications can, to a certain extent, be achieved through compiler optimizations. Nonetheless, software developers should still make reasonable design choices to improve energy efficiency further. In this paper, we present the energy efficiency of common sorting algorithms under different pre-sorted conditions. Previous work in this field considered only randomized data. We expand on this previous work and measure the sorting algorithms' energy efficiency when the data is already partially sorted to 20% and 50%. Our presented experience is a case study intended to demonstrate the effect simple design choices, such as the selection of algorithm as well as its implementation, can make on energy efficiency. It is intended for industry practitioners to aid them in selecting a more energy-efficient algorithm for their problems at hand through helpful guidelines. Our results also can function as an incentive to make energy efficiency a non-functional requirement for tenders, and as a motivation for researchers to include energy efficiency as an additional quality criterion when studying the properties of algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering\",\"volume\":\"287 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3491204.3527468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3491204.3527468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

到2030年,数据中心的能源需求预计将达到每年1PWh,能源效率已成为IT行业的主要关注点。当硬件设计人员提高其产品的能源效率时,软件开发人员通常没有考虑或不知道他们的设计选择可能对由应用程序执行引起的能源消耗产生的影响。在一定程度上,可以通过编译器优化来提高应用程序的能效。尽管如此,软件开发人员仍然应该做出合理的设计选择,以进一步提高能源效率。本文给出了常用排序算法在不同预排序条件下的能量效率。该领域以前的工作只考虑随机数据。我们扩展了之前的工作,并在数据已经部分排序到20%和50%时测量排序算法的能源效率。我们提出的经验是一个案例研究,旨在证明简单的设计选择,如算法的选择及其实施,可以对能源效率产生影响。它旨在通过有用的指导方针帮助行业从业者为他们手头的问题选择更节能的算法。我们的结果也可以作为一种激励,使能源效率成为招标的非功能要求,并作为研究人员在研究算法特性时将能源效率作为附加质量标准的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experience and Guidelines for Sorting Algorithm Choices and Their Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency has become a major concern in the IT sector as the energy demand for data centers is projected to reach 1PWh per year by 2030. While hardware designers improve the energy efficiency of their products, software developers often do not consider or are unaware of the impact their design choices can make on the energy consumption caused by the execution of their applications. Energy efficiency improvements in applications can, to a certain extent, be achieved through compiler optimizations. Nonetheless, software developers should still make reasonable design choices to improve energy efficiency further. In this paper, we present the energy efficiency of common sorting algorithms under different pre-sorted conditions. Previous work in this field considered only randomized data. We expand on this previous work and measure the sorting algorithms' energy efficiency when the data is already partially sorted to 20% and 50%. Our presented experience is a case study intended to demonstrate the effect simple design choices, such as the selection of algorithm as well as its implementation, can make on energy efficiency. It is intended for industry practitioners to aid them in selecting a more energy-efficient algorithm for their problems at hand through helpful guidelines. Our results also can function as an incentive to make energy efficiency a non-functional requirement for tenders, and as a motivation for researchers to include energy efficiency as an additional quality criterion when studying the properties of algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SPEC Efficiency Benchmark Development: How to Contribute to the Future of Energy Conservation Change Point Detection for MongoDB Time Series Performance Regression Performance Evaluation of GraphCore IPU-M2000 Accelerator for Text Detection Application Measuring Baseline Overheads in Different Orchestration Mechanisms for Large FaaS Workflows MAPLE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1