纽约证券交易所对专家不当行为的回应:自我监管失败的一个例子

N. S. Ellis, L. M. Fairchild, Harold D. Fletcher
{"title":"纽约证券交易所对专家不当行为的回应:自我监管失败的一个例子","authors":"N. S. Ellis, L. M. Fairchild, Harold D. Fletcher","doi":"10.15779/Z38QK3Z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................. 104 I. An Illustration of the Problem ......................... ...... 108 A. NYSE Operations ............................ ...... 108 1. The NYSE as an Auction Market .............. ...... 108 2. The Role of the Specialist ..................... ..... 109 B. The Regulatory Environment of the NYSE ...... .............. 111 1. The Nature of the Regulatory Scheme.............. ........ 111 2. The Regulation of Specialist Behavior ................. 113 C. Specialist Misconduct ......................... ...... 115 1. The Specialist Scandals of the Early 2000's ...... ....... 115 2. Inadequacy of NYSE Regulation ..........................117 3. Inadequacy of SEC Oversight.. ..................... 119 4. Inadequacy of the Threat of a Private Cause of Action..........121 D. The Free Ride ............................................. 127 II. NYSE Reform............... ...................... ..... 128 A. Governance Issues ............................... 128 B. Retention of the Specialist System........... .. .......... 129 C. The Current NYSE Structure ..................... ..... 130 D. Inadequacy of Reform. ......................... ...... 131 III. The Role of the Specialist .................................. 131 A. Arguments in Favor of Retaining Specialists ........ ......... 132 1. The Need for Human Judgment ............................. 132 2. Maintenance of Fair and Orderly Markets .................... 133 3. Reduced Volatility ......................... ...... 133 4. Enhanced Liquidity. .............................. 134 5. Increased Efficiency ........................ ...... 135","PeriodicalId":326069,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The NYSE Response to Specialist Misconduct: An Example of the Failure of Self-Regulation\",\"authors\":\"N. S. Ellis, L. M. Fairchild, Harold D. Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38QK3Z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................. 104 I. An Illustration of the Problem ......................... ...... 108 A. NYSE Operations ............................ ...... 108 1. The NYSE as an Auction Market .............. ...... 108 2. The Role of the Specialist ..................... ..... 109 B. The Regulatory Environment of the NYSE ...... .............. 111 1. The Nature of the Regulatory Scheme.............. ........ 111 2. The Regulation of Specialist Behavior ................. 113 C. Specialist Misconduct ......................... ...... 115 1. The Specialist Scandals of the Early 2000's ...... ....... 115 2. Inadequacy of NYSE Regulation ..........................117 3. Inadequacy of SEC Oversight.. ..................... 119 4. Inadequacy of the Threat of a Private Cause of Action..........121 D. The Free Ride ............................................. 127 II. NYSE Reform............... ...................... ..... 128 A. Governance Issues ............................... 128 B. Retention of the Specialist System........... .. .......... 129 C. The Current NYSE Structure ..................... ..... 130 D. Inadequacy of Reform. ......................... ...... 131 III. The Role of the Specialist .................................. 131 A. Arguments in Favor of Retaining Specialists ........ ......... 132 1. The Need for Human Judgment ............................. 132 2. Maintenance of Fair and Orderly Markets .................... 133 3. Reduced Volatility ......................... ...... 133 4. Enhanced Liquidity. .............................. 134 5. Increased Efficiency ........................ ...... 135\",\"PeriodicalId\":326069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Business Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Business Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38QK3Z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38QK3Z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

表的内容介绍 .................................................104 i的说明这个问题 ......................... ......108 A。纽交所业务 ............................ ......108年1。纽交所作为拍卖市场 .............. ......108 2。专家的角色 ..................... .....109年纽约证券交易所的监管环境 ...... ..............111年1。监管计划的本质 .............. ........111 2。专家的规定的行为 .................113 c .专家不当行为 ......................... ......115年1。2000年初的专家丑闻...... .......115 2。纽约证券交易所监管不足 ..........................117 3。证券交易委员会监管的不足 .. .....................119 4。121 .私人诉因威胁的不足..........d .的免费 .............................................127二世。纽交所的改革 ............... ...................... .....128 A。治理问题 ...............................128 b .专家系统的保留 ........... .. ..........129 c .当前纽交所的结构 ..................... .....130 d不足的改革 . ......................... ......131 III。专家的角色 ..................................131 A。支持保留专家的理由........ .........132年1。需要人类的判断 .............................132 2。维护公平和有序的市场 ....................133 3。减少波动 ......................... ......133 4。增强流动性 . ..............................134 5。提高效率 ........................ ......135
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The NYSE Response to Specialist Misconduct: An Example of the Failure of Self-Regulation
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................. 104 I. An Illustration of the Problem ......................... ...... 108 A. NYSE Operations ............................ ...... 108 1. The NYSE as an Auction Market .............. ...... 108 2. The Role of the Specialist ..................... ..... 109 B. The Regulatory Environment of the NYSE ...... .............. 111 1. The Nature of the Regulatory Scheme.............. ........ 111 2. The Regulation of Specialist Behavior ................. 113 C. Specialist Misconduct ......................... ...... 115 1. The Specialist Scandals of the Early 2000's ...... ....... 115 2. Inadequacy of NYSE Regulation ..........................117 3. Inadequacy of SEC Oversight.. ..................... 119 4. Inadequacy of the Threat of a Private Cause of Action..........121 D. The Free Ride ............................................. 127 II. NYSE Reform............... ...................... ..... 128 A. Governance Issues ............................... 128 B. Retention of the Specialist System........... .. .......... 129 C. The Current NYSE Structure ..................... ..... 130 D. Inadequacy of Reform. ......................... ...... 131 III. The Role of the Specialist .................................. 131 A. Arguments in Favor of Retaining Specialists ........ ......... 132 1. The Need for Human Judgment ............................. 132 2. Maintenance of Fair and Orderly Markets .................... 133 3. Reduced Volatility ......................... ...... 133 4. Enhanced Liquidity. .............................. 134 5. Increased Efficiency ........................ ...... 135
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Responsibility of Business Is Not Social Responsibility: Assume That There Are No Angels and Allow the Free Market's Touch of Heaven Piercing the Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives Effectively Discharging Fiduciary Duties in IP-Rich M&A Transactions The Enigma of Hostile Takeovers in Japan: Bidder Beware National Security Review in Foreign Investments: A Comparative and Critical Assessment on China and U.S. Laws and Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1