{"title":"氩激光光凝术与手术切除良性结膜痣的比较","authors":"A. Tawfik","doi":"10.58675/2682-339x.1722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Conjunctival naevus is a widespread benign eye tumor. Surgical excision or argon laser photocoagulation are the choice of treatment for super fi cial and deep conjunctival naevi. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare between surgical excision and argon laser photoablation of conjunctival naevus concerning safety, ef fi cacy and postremoval complications. Patients and methods : A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Ophthalmology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt in the period from January 2022 to January 2023. 40 patients with benign pigmented conjunctival naevi were included and formed two groups; group (1) included 20 patients and used argon laser photocoagulation for removal of conjunctival naevi, while group (2) included 20 patients and surgical excision of conjunctival naevi was done. Results : As regard to postremoval complications, recurrence of naevi occurred in group (1) only, dry eye was higher in argon laser ablation than surgical excision (15% vs. 5%), conjunctival in fl ammation was higher in excision than argon laser (20% vs. 10%), and scaring occurred in surgical excision group only. Unsatisfaction was higher in surgical excision than laser ablation. Also, there were statistically signi fi cant difference between both groups as regard to complications. Conclusion : Argon laser ablation is a simple and ef fi cient treatment of benign conjunctival naevi and may be used in chosen patients instead of a traditional surgical technique.","PeriodicalId":256725,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar International Medical Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of Benign Conjunctival Naevus by Argon Laser Photocoagulation compared to Surgical Excision\",\"authors\":\"A. Tawfik\",\"doi\":\"10.58675/2682-339x.1722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Conjunctival naevus is a widespread benign eye tumor. Surgical excision or argon laser photocoagulation are the choice of treatment for super fi cial and deep conjunctival naevi. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare between surgical excision and argon laser photoablation of conjunctival naevus concerning safety, ef fi cacy and postremoval complications. Patients and methods : A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Ophthalmology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt in the period from January 2022 to January 2023. 40 patients with benign pigmented conjunctival naevi were included and formed two groups; group (1) included 20 patients and used argon laser photocoagulation for removal of conjunctival naevi, while group (2) included 20 patients and surgical excision of conjunctival naevi was done. Results : As regard to postremoval complications, recurrence of naevi occurred in group (1) only, dry eye was higher in argon laser ablation than surgical excision (15% vs. 5%), conjunctival in fl ammation was higher in excision than argon laser (20% vs. 10%), and scaring occurred in surgical excision group only. Unsatisfaction was higher in surgical excision than laser ablation. Also, there were statistically signi fi cant difference between both groups as regard to complications. Conclusion : Argon laser ablation is a simple and ef fi cient treatment of benign conjunctival naevi and may be used in chosen patients instead of a traditional surgical technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar International Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar International Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58675/2682-339x.1722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar International Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58675/2682-339x.1722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:结膜痣是一种广泛存在的良性眼部肿瘤。手术切除或氩激光光凝是治疗超深结膜痣的首选方法。目的:比较手术切除与氩激光消融治疗结膜痣的安全性、有效性及术后并发症。患者与方法:于2022年1月至2023年1月在埃及爱资哈尔大学附属医院眼科进行随机对照试验。选取40例良性色素结膜痣患者,分为两组;组(1)20例,采用氩激光光凝术切除结膜内痣;组(2)20例,采用手术切除结膜内痣。结果:术后并发症方面,只有(1)组出现痣复发,氩激光消融组干眼发生率高于手术切除组(15% vs. 5%),结膜炎症发生率高于氩激光切除组(20% vs. 10%),结膜结疤发生率仅为手术切除组。手术切除的不满意率高于激光消融。此外,两组在并发症方面也有统计学上的差异。结论:氩激光消融是治疗良性结膜痣的一种简单有效的方法,可替代传统的手术治疗方法。
Removal of Benign Conjunctival Naevus by Argon Laser Photocoagulation compared to Surgical Excision
Background : Conjunctival naevus is a widespread benign eye tumor. Surgical excision or argon laser photocoagulation are the choice of treatment for super fi cial and deep conjunctival naevi. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare between surgical excision and argon laser photoablation of conjunctival naevus concerning safety, ef fi cacy and postremoval complications. Patients and methods : A randomized controlled trial was conducted in Ophthalmology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt in the period from January 2022 to January 2023. 40 patients with benign pigmented conjunctival naevi were included and formed two groups; group (1) included 20 patients and used argon laser photocoagulation for removal of conjunctival naevi, while group (2) included 20 patients and surgical excision of conjunctival naevi was done. Results : As regard to postremoval complications, recurrence of naevi occurred in group (1) only, dry eye was higher in argon laser ablation than surgical excision (15% vs. 5%), conjunctival in fl ammation was higher in excision than argon laser (20% vs. 10%), and scaring occurred in surgical excision group only. Unsatisfaction was higher in surgical excision than laser ablation. Also, there were statistically signi fi cant difference between both groups as regard to complications. Conclusion : Argon laser ablation is a simple and ef fi cient treatment of benign conjunctival naevi and may be used in chosen patients instead of a traditional surgical technique.