对外知识开放如何影响服务创新?来自韩国服务业的证据

Seongwuk Moon
{"title":"对外知识开放如何影响服务创新?来自韩国服务业的证据","authors":"Seongwuk Moon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1976896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I examine whether firms’ openness improves innovative performance of the firms and what factors make the openness more effective in generating innovation. Using 2006 Korean Innovation Survey in service sector, I test whether openness improves innovative performance and how absorptive capacity, new startup and use of appropriation methods influence the effect of openness on Korean service firms’ innovation respectively. I find the following: First, the effect of openness varies depending on type of innovation. Openness is more effective for radical innovation than for incremental innovation. Second, there is complementarity between openness and R&D intensity when innovation is radical. When the R&D intensity level is high, the effect of openness becomes stronger. However, there is no complementarity when innovation is incremental. Third, openness is more effective for a new startup to perform radical innovation than incremental innovation. Fourth, when a firm uses too many appropriation methods, openness is not effective for innovation.","PeriodicalId":347047,"journal":{"name":"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Will Openness to External Knowledge Impact Service Innovation? Evidence from Korean Service Sector\",\"authors\":\"Seongwuk Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1976896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I examine whether firms’ openness improves innovative performance of the firms and what factors make the openness more effective in generating innovation. Using 2006 Korean Innovation Survey in service sector, I test whether openness improves innovative performance and how absorptive capacity, new startup and use of appropriation methods influence the effect of openness on Korean service firms’ innovation respectively. I find the following: First, the effect of openness varies depending on type of innovation. Openness is more effective for radical innovation than for incremental innovation. Second, there is complementarity between openness and R&D intensity when innovation is radical. When the R&D intensity level is high, the effect of openness becomes stronger. However, there is no complementarity when innovation is incremental. Third, openness is more effective for a new startup to perform radical innovation than incremental innovation. Fourth, when a firm uses too many appropriation methods, openness is not effective for innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我考察了企业的开放性是否提高了企业的创新绩效,以及哪些因素使开放性更有效地产生创新。本文利用2006年韩国服务业创新调查,检验了开放是否能提高创新绩效,以及吸收能力、新创企业和使用拨款方法分别如何影响开放对韩国服务企业创新的影响。研究发现:第一,创新类型不同,开放的效果也不同。开放对于突破性创新比渐进式创新更有效。第二,当创新处于激进状态时,开放程度与研发强度之间存在互补性。研发强度水平越高,开放效应越强。然而,当创新是渐进式时,就不存在互补。第三,开放性对新创企业进行突破性创新比渐进式创新更有效。第四,当企业使用过多的拨款方式时,开放不利于创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Will Openness to External Knowledge Impact Service Innovation? Evidence from Korean Service Sector
I examine whether firms’ openness improves innovative performance of the firms and what factors make the openness more effective in generating innovation. Using 2006 Korean Innovation Survey in service sector, I test whether openness improves innovative performance and how absorptive capacity, new startup and use of appropriation methods influence the effect of openness on Korean service firms’ innovation respectively. I find the following: First, the effect of openness varies depending on type of innovation. Openness is more effective for radical innovation than for incremental innovation. Second, there is complementarity between openness and R&D intensity when innovation is radical. When the R&D intensity level is high, the effect of openness becomes stronger. However, there is no complementarity when innovation is incremental. Third, openness is more effective for a new startup to perform radical innovation than incremental innovation. Fourth, when a firm uses too many appropriation methods, openness is not effective for innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spectrum Flexibility and Mobile Development A Systematic Review of Experimental Approaches on Public Service Motivation The Development of Central Bank Digital Currency in China: An Analysis The Legacy of State Repression on Contemporary Trust: Indiscriminate versus Targeted Repression in Soviet Russia Perception of the Risk of the COVID-19 Pandemic by Population : The Case of Gabon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1