{"title":"对外知识开放如何影响服务创新?来自韩国服务业的证据","authors":"Seongwuk Moon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1976896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I examine whether firms’ openness improves innovative performance of the firms and what factors make the openness more effective in generating innovation. Using 2006 Korean Innovation Survey in service sector, I test whether openness improves innovative performance and how absorptive capacity, new startup and use of appropriation methods influence the effect of openness on Korean service firms’ innovation respectively. I find the following: First, the effect of openness varies depending on type of innovation. Openness is more effective for radical innovation than for incremental innovation. Second, there is complementarity between openness and R&D intensity when innovation is radical. When the R&D intensity level is high, the effect of openness becomes stronger. However, there is no complementarity when innovation is incremental. Third, openness is more effective for a new startup to perform radical innovation than incremental innovation. Fourth, when a firm uses too many appropriation methods, openness is not effective for innovation.","PeriodicalId":347047,"journal":{"name":"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Will Openness to External Knowledge Impact Service Innovation? Evidence from Korean Service Sector\",\"authors\":\"Seongwuk Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1976896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I examine whether firms’ openness improves innovative performance of the firms and what factors make the openness more effective in generating innovation. Using 2006 Korean Innovation Survey in service sector, I test whether openness improves innovative performance and how absorptive capacity, new startup and use of appropriation methods influence the effect of openness on Korean service firms’ innovation respectively. I find the following: First, the effect of openness varies depending on type of innovation. Openness is more effective for radical innovation than for incremental innovation. Second, there is complementarity between openness and R&D intensity when innovation is radical. When the R&D intensity level is high, the effect of openness becomes stronger. However, there is no complementarity when innovation is incremental. Third, openness is more effective for a new startup to perform radical innovation than incremental innovation. Fourth, when a firm uses too many appropriation methods, openness is not effective for innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KDI School of Public Policy & Management Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Will Openness to External Knowledge Impact Service Innovation? Evidence from Korean Service Sector
I examine whether firms’ openness improves innovative performance of the firms and what factors make the openness more effective in generating innovation. Using 2006 Korean Innovation Survey in service sector, I test whether openness improves innovative performance and how absorptive capacity, new startup and use of appropriation methods influence the effect of openness on Korean service firms’ innovation respectively. I find the following: First, the effect of openness varies depending on type of innovation. Openness is more effective for radical innovation than for incremental innovation. Second, there is complementarity between openness and R&D intensity when innovation is radical. When the R&D intensity level is high, the effect of openness becomes stronger. However, there is no complementarity when innovation is incremental. Third, openness is more effective for a new startup to perform radical innovation than incremental innovation. Fourth, when a firm uses too many appropriation methods, openness is not effective for innovation.