经皮肾碎石切开术,改良瓦尔迪维亚体位手术治疗肾结石患者的初步经验

A. Sánchez-Bermeo, J.R. Arellano-Cuadros, S. García-Cruz, J. Torres-Aguilar, C. Reyes-Vela
{"title":"经皮肾碎石切开术,改良瓦尔迪维亚体位手术治疗肾结石患者的初步经验","authors":"A. Sánchez-Bermeo,&nbsp;J.R. Arellano-Cuadros,&nbsp;S. García-Cruz,&nbsp;J. Torres-Aguilar,&nbsp;C. Reyes-Vela","doi":"10.1016/j.uromx.2015.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Renal lithiasis is a very common pathology that has been described since Hippocrates. Its etiopathogenesis involves different theories on formation that include saturation, oversaturation, crystal nucleation, crystal growth, epitaxis, matrix, crystallization inhibitors, epidemiologic aspects, and heredity. Compared with classic lumbotomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a less aggressive technique facilitating kidney stone treatment. Reduced hospital stay, low analgesic use, and a shorter recovery period make this a well-accepted surgical technique by patients and it is considered the first treatment option in many cases.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To present the experience at our institution with the modified version of the previously described technique.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>All surgical notes on percutaneous nephrolithotomies in the modified Valdivia position performed within the time frame of January to August 2014 were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the patients was 42 years. Of the 10 patients included in the study, 7 were men and 3 were women. Five of the patients presented with staghorn stones, 2 with pyelic stones, and the rest with pyelic and calyceal stones. Stone size ranged from 2 to 7<!--> <!-->cm. A total of 2 (28.6%) stones were in the lower portion of the collecting system, 7 (64%) were in the middle portion, and one (7.1%) was in the upper portion. Estimated surgery duration was a mean of 120.5<!--> <!-->min. The complication rate (Clavien-Dindo: I-IV) was 20%, one patient presented with bleeding that was controlled, and 80% of the patients were stone free.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our experience, percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the modified Valdivia technique is a safe and effective option with a high success rate, anesthesiological advantages, and few complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34909,"journal":{"name":"Revista mexicana de urologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2015.07.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiencia inicial nefrolitotomía percutánea, posición de Valdivia modificada para el tratamiento quirúrgico en pacientes con litiasis renal\",\"authors\":\"A. Sánchez-Bermeo,&nbsp;J.R. Arellano-Cuadros,&nbsp;S. García-Cruz,&nbsp;J. Torres-Aguilar,&nbsp;C. Reyes-Vela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.uromx.2015.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Renal lithiasis is a very common pathology that has been described since Hippocrates. Its etiopathogenesis involves different theories on formation that include saturation, oversaturation, crystal nucleation, crystal growth, epitaxis, matrix, crystallization inhibitors, epidemiologic aspects, and heredity. Compared with classic lumbotomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a less aggressive technique facilitating kidney stone treatment. Reduced hospital stay, low analgesic use, and a shorter recovery period make this a well-accepted surgical technique by patients and it is considered the first treatment option in many cases.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To present the experience at our institution with the modified version of the previously described technique.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>All surgical notes on percutaneous nephrolithotomies in the modified Valdivia position performed within the time frame of January to August 2014 were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the patients was 42 years. Of the 10 patients included in the study, 7 were men and 3 were women. Five of the patients presented with staghorn stones, 2 with pyelic stones, and the rest with pyelic and calyceal stones. Stone size ranged from 2 to 7<!--> <!-->cm. A total of 2 (28.6%) stones were in the lower portion of the collecting system, 7 (64%) were in the middle portion, and one (7.1%) was in the upper portion. Estimated surgery duration was a mean of 120.5<!--> <!-->min. The complication rate (Clavien-Dindo: I-IV) was 20%, one patient presented with bleeding that was controlled, and 80% of the patients were stone free.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our experience, percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the modified Valdivia technique is a safe and effective option with a high success rate, anesthesiological advantages, and few complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista mexicana de urologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2015.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista mexicana de urologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007408515001007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista mexicana de urologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007408515001007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾结石是一种非常常见的病理,从希波克拉底开始就有描述。其发病机制涉及不同的形成理论,包括饱和、过饱和、晶体成核、晶体生长、外延、基质、结晶抑制剂、流行病学和遗传。与传统的腰切除术相比,经皮肾镜取石术是一种微创的治疗肾结石的技术。住院时间短,镇痛药用量少,恢复期短,这是一种被患者广泛接受的手术技术,在许多情况下被认为是第一种治疗选择。目的介绍本机构对先前描述的技术的改进版本的经验。材料与方法回顾2014年1 - 8月经皮改良Valdivia体位肾镜取石术的手术记录。结果患者平均年龄42岁。在参与研究的10名患者中,7名男性,3名女性。5例为鹿角结石,2例为肾盂结石,其余为肾盂和肾盏结石。石头的大小从2到7厘米不等。收集系统下部2颗(28.6%),中部7颗(64%),上部1颗(7.1%)。估计手术时间平均为120.5分钟。并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo: I-IV)为20%,1例患者出血得到控制,80%的患者无结石。结论经皮肾镜取石术采用改良的Valdivia技术,成功率高,麻醉优势,并发症少,是一种安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiencia inicial nefrolitotomía percutánea, posición de Valdivia modificada para el tratamiento quirúrgico en pacientes con litiasis renal

Background

Renal lithiasis is a very common pathology that has been described since Hippocrates. Its etiopathogenesis involves different theories on formation that include saturation, oversaturation, crystal nucleation, crystal growth, epitaxis, matrix, crystallization inhibitors, epidemiologic aspects, and heredity. Compared with classic lumbotomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a less aggressive technique facilitating kidney stone treatment. Reduced hospital stay, low analgesic use, and a shorter recovery period make this a well-accepted surgical technique by patients and it is considered the first treatment option in many cases.

Aims

To present the experience at our institution with the modified version of the previously described technique.

Material and methods

All surgical notes on percutaneous nephrolithotomies in the modified Valdivia position performed within the time frame of January to August 2014 were reviewed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 42 years. Of the 10 patients included in the study, 7 were men and 3 were women. Five of the patients presented with staghorn stones, 2 with pyelic stones, and the rest with pyelic and calyceal stones. Stone size ranged from 2 to 7 cm. A total of 2 (28.6%) stones were in the lower portion of the collecting system, 7 (64%) were in the middle portion, and one (7.1%) was in the upper portion. Estimated surgery duration was a mean of 120.5 min. The complication rate (Clavien-Dindo: I-IV) was 20%, one patient presented with bleeding that was controlled, and 80% of the patients were stone free.

Conclusions

In our experience, percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the modified Valdivia technique is a safe and effective option with a high success rate, anesthesiological advantages, and few complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista mexicana de urologia
Revista mexicana de urologia Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Revista Mexicana de Urología (RMU) [Mexican Journal of Urology] (ISSN: 0185-4542 / ISSN electronic: 2007-4085) is bimonthly publication that disseminates research by academicians and professionals of the international medical community interested in urological subjects, in the format of original articles, clinical cases, review articles brief communications and letters to the editor. Owing to its nature, it is publication with international scope that disseminates contributions in Spanish and English that are rigorously reviewed by peers under the double blind modality. Neither journalistic documents nor those that lack rigorous medical or scientific support are suitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Fe de errores de «Resultados obtenidos con nefrolitotomía percutánea y su correlación con las escalas de Guy y S.T.O.N.E. en un hospital de la Ciudad de México» [Rev Mex Urol. 2016;76:331] Blindness due to a systemic fungal infection in a patient with a ureteral catheter Permixon® en el tratamiento de los síntomas del tracto urinario inferior por hiperplasia benigna de próstata: Nuevas aportaciones Resultados de la nefrectomía laparoscópica en pacientes obesos y no obesos Alfa-1 bloqueantes y resultados urodinámicos en varones con síntomas del tracto urinario inferior relacionados con obstrucción benigna de próstata: ¿fin de la controversia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1