个人位置信息用于公共利益的原则与限制:对个人信息保护法立法技术的启示

Woomin Shim
{"title":"个人位置信息用于公共利益的原则与限制:对个人信息保护法立法技术的启示","authors":"Woomin Shim","doi":"10.58555/li.2022.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic situation shows an aspect of accelerating the digital transformation, which has been discussed as the goal of government policy. This transformation process not only enhances individual freedom, but also induces restrictions and controls aimed at the public interest. This article focuses on the legislative issue surrounding the disclosure and utilization of movement information about confirmed patients, which was a problem during the recent COVID-19 pandemic period. Controversy over government guidelines surrounding the disclosure of the movement about confirmed patients made it clear that it is not simply whether such administrative measures complied with legal requirements, but that the balance between public interest values and private values of privacy is important. Based on this premise, this article reviewed the problems of the discourse on the use of personal data or personal location data for public interest purposes in terms of legislative technique. Korea's Personal Data Protection Act frequently utilizes very convenient legislative technique in setting comprehensive exceptions for the purpose of public interest. In conclusion, the ultimate issue in the use of personal data for public interest is not the protection of identification information and its exceptions, but whether or not the privacy and private life of the data subject can be practically protected. Nonetheless, the current legislation focuses only on establishing a comprehensive exception category in terms of legislative technique. In order to overcome these problems and develope legislation for privacy protection in the new era, it is necessary to devise new legislative technique that can reflect the request for change.","PeriodicalId":115318,"journal":{"name":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principles and Limitations of Using Personal Location Data for Public Interest: Implications for Legislative Technology of Personal Data Protection Act\",\"authors\":\"Woomin Shim\",\"doi\":\"10.58555/li.2022.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic situation shows an aspect of accelerating the digital transformation, which has been discussed as the goal of government policy. This transformation process not only enhances individual freedom, but also induces restrictions and controls aimed at the public interest. This article focuses on the legislative issue surrounding the disclosure and utilization of movement information about confirmed patients, which was a problem during the recent COVID-19 pandemic period. Controversy over government guidelines surrounding the disclosure of the movement about confirmed patients made it clear that it is not simply whether such administrative measures complied with legal requirements, but that the balance between public interest values and private values of privacy is important. Based on this premise, this article reviewed the problems of the discourse on the use of personal data or personal location data for public interest purposes in terms of legislative technique. Korea's Personal Data Protection Act frequently utilizes very convenient legislative technique in setting comprehensive exceptions for the purpose of public interest. In conclusion, the ultimate issue in the use of personal data for public interest is not the protection of identification information and its exceptions, but whether or not the privacy and private life of the data subject can be practically protected. Nonetheless, the current legislation focuses only on establishing a comprehensive exception category in terms of legislative technique. In order to overcome these problems and develope legislation for privacy protection in the new era, it is necessary to devise new legislative technique that can reflect the request for change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情显示出加速数字化转型的一个方面,这已被作为政府政策目标加以讨论。这一转变过程既增强了个人自由,也引发了针对公共利益的限制和控制。本文重点讨论了在新冠肺炎大流行期间出现问题的确诊患者移动信息公开和利用的立法问题。围绕公开确诊患者动向的政府方针引发的争议表明,这不仅仅是行政措施是否符合法律要求的问题,更重要的是在公共利益价值和隐私的私人价值之间取得平衡。基于这一前提,本文从立法技术的角度对基于公共利益目的使用个人数据或个人位置数据的论述中存在的问题进行了梳理。韩国的《个人信息保护法》经常利用非常方便的立法技术,以公共利益为目的设定全面的例外情况。综上所述,为了公共利益而使用个人数据的最终问题不是对身份信息及其例外的保护,而是数据主体的隐私和私人生活能否得到实际保护。然而,现行立法在立法技术上只是侧重于建立一个全面的例外范畴。为了克服这些问题,发展新时代的隐私保护立法,有必要设计出能够反映变革要求的新的立法技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Principles and Limitations of Using Personal Location Data for Public Interest: Implications for Legislative Technology of Personal Data Protection Act
The COVID-19 pandemic situation shows an aspect of accelerating the digital transformation, which has been discussed as the goal of government policy. This transformation process not only enhances individual freedom, but also induces restrictions and controls aimed at the public interest. This article focuses on the legislative issue surrounding the disclosure and utilization of movement information about confirmed patients, which was a problem during the recent COVID-19 pandemic period. Controversy over government guidelines surrounding the disclosure of the movement about confirmed patients made it clear that it is not simply whether such administrative measures complied with legal requirements, but that the balance between public interest values and private values of privacy is important. Based on this premise, this article reviewed the problems of the discourse on the use of personal data or personal location data for public interest purposes in terms of legislative technique. Korea's Personal Data Protection Act frequently utilizes very convenient legislative technique in setting comprehensive exceptions for the purpose of public interest. In conclusion, the ultimate issue in the use of personal data for public interest is not the protection of identification information and its exceptions, but whether or not the privacy and private life of the data subject can be practically protected. Nonetheless, the current legislation focuses only on establishing a comprehensive exception category in terms of legislative technique. In order to overcome these problems and develope legislation for privacy protection in the new era, it is necessary to devise new legislative technique that can reflect the request for change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
입법영향분석 어떻게 할 것인가? Principles and Limitations of Using Personal Location Data for Public Interest: Implications for Legislative Technology of Personal Data Protection Act A study on the revision of the “Security Guard Act” and the establishment of 'Congestion Guard' in Japan The Normative Power of the Inter-Korean Agreement The Gap in the Legal Texts and the Supplementation by Interpretation - Focusing on the provisions and interpretations of property rights under Article 23 of the Constitution -
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1