基于深度学习推理的边缘设备资源异构特征

Jianwei Hao, Piyush Subedi, I. Kim, Lakshmish Ramaswamy
{"title":"基于深度学习推理的边缘设备资源异构特征","authors":"Jianwei Hao, Piyush Subedi, I. Kim, Lakshmish Ramaswamy","doi":"10.1145/3452411.3464446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant advances in hardware capabilities and the availability of enormous data sets have led to the rise and penetration of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) in various domains. Considerable efforts have been put forth in academia and industry to make these computationally demanding DL tasks work on resource-constrained edge devices. However, performing DL tasks on edge devices is still challenging due to the diversity of DNN (Deep Neural Networks) architectures and heterogeneity of edge devices. This study evaluates and characterizes the performance and resource heterogeneity in various edge devices for performing DL tasks. We benchmark various DNN models for image classification on a set of edge devices ranging from the widely popular and relatively less powerful Raspberry Pi to GPU-equipped high-performance edge devices like Jetson Xavier NX. We also compare and contrast the performance of three widely-used DL frameworks when used in these edge devices. We report DL inference throughput, CPU and memory usage, power consumption, and frameworks' initialization overhead, which are the most critical factors for characterizing DL tasks on edge devices. Additionally, we provide our insights and findings, which will provide a better idea of how compatible or feasible edge devices are for running DL applications.","PeriodicalId":339207,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Resource Heterogeneity in Edge Devices for Deep Learning Inferences\",\"authors\":\"Jianwei Hao, Piyush Subedi, I. Kim, Lakshmish Ramaswamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3452411.3464446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Significant advances in hardware capabilities and the availability of enormous data sets have led to the rise and penetration of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) in various domains. Considerable efforts have been put forth in academia and industry to make these computationally demanding DL tasks work on resource-constrained edge devices. However, performing DL tasks on edge devices is still challenging due to the diversity of DNN (Deep Neural Networks) architectures and heterogeneity of edge devices. This study evaluates and characterizes the performance and resource heterogeneity in various edge devices for performing DL tasks. We benchmark various DNN models for image classification on a set of edge devices ranging from the widely popular and relatively less powerful Raspberry Pi to GPU-equipped high-performance edge devices like Jetson Xavier NX. We also compare and contrast the performance of three widely-used DL frameworks when used in these edge devices. We report DL inference throughput, CPU and memory usage, power consumption, and frameworks' initialization overhead, which are the most critical factors for characterizing DL tasks on edge devices. Additionally, we provide our insights and findings, which will provide a better idea of how compatible or feasible edge devices are for running DL applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452411.3464446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452411.3464446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

硬件能力的显著进步和海量数据集的可用性导致了人工智能(AI)和深度学习(DL)在各个领域的兴起和渗透。学术界和工业界已经付出了相当大的努力,使这些计算要求很高的深度学习任务能够在资源受限的边缘设备上工作。然而,由于DNN(深度神经网络)架构的多样性和边缘设备的异质性,在边缘设备上执行深度学习任务仍然具有挑战性。本研究评估和表征了执行深度学习任务的各种边缘设备的性能和资源异质性。我们在一组边缘设备上对各种DNN模型进行了图像分类基准测试,这些设备从广受欢迎但功能相对较弱的树莓派到配备gpu的高性能边缘设备,如Jetson Xavier NX。我们还比较和对比了在这些边缘设备中使用的三种广泛使用的深度学习框架的性能。我们报告了深度学习推理吞吐量、CPU和内存使用、功耗和框架初始化开销,这些是表征边缘设备上深度学习任务的最关键因素。此外,我们还提供了我们的见解和发现,这将更好地了解边缘设备对于运行DL应用程序的兼容性或可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing Resource Heterogeneity in Edge Devices for Deep Learning Inferences
Significant advances in hardware capabilities and the availability of enormous data sets have led to the rise and penetration of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) in various domains. Considerable efforts have been put forth in academia and industry to make these computationally demanding DL tasks work on resource-constrained edge devices. However, performing DL tasks on edge devices is still challenging due to the diversity of DNN (Deep Neural Networks) architectures and heterogeneity of edge devices. This study evaluates and characterizes the performance and resource heterogeneity in various edge devices for performing DL tasks. We benchmark various DNN models for image classification on a set of edge devices ranging from the widely popular and relatively less powerful Raspberry Pi to GPU-equipped high-performance edge devices like Jetson Xavier NX. We also compare and contrast the performance of three widely-used DL frameworks when used in these edge devices. We report DL inference throughput, CPU and memory usage, power consumption, and frameworks' initialization overhead, which are the most critical factors for characterizing DL tasks on edge devices. Additionally, we provide our insights and findings, which will provide a better idea of how compatible or feasible edge devices are for running DL applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INODE - Intelligence Open Data Exploration Session details: Technical Session 2 Analyzing Scientific Data Sharing Patterns for In-network Data Caching Evaluations of Network Performance Enhancement on Cloud-native Network Function Access Patterns to Disk Cache for Large Scientific Archive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1