{"title":"不是独特的,也不是普遍的:俄罗斯公民对在线投票技术的风险感知和接受","authors":"Valeria V. Babayan, Aleksey V. Turobov","doi":"10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the connection between Russian citizens' perception of Internet voting and the context of its top down adoption with their readiness to use it? To investigate this question, we use Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to account for both observed and latent indicators of technology adoption and their linkage with the Internet voting use intent. The authors use survey evidence from VCIOM (2020) and a national survey of Internet users conducted by Online Marketing Intelligence (OMI) company in 2021. This study provides some support to the application of theoretical expectations formulated in the context of Western democracies to the Russian population's voting technology attitudes. The findings indicate that the use of the Internet is not a robust measure of technology acceptance anymore, and a more nuanced approach to the experiences of Internet usage is needed. Internet users appear to be more concerned about privacy, the possibility of fraud, and external interference than the respondents drawn from the overall population. The authors suggest that it is due to acceptance of risks seeming inevitable and to bigger digital literacy and therefore awareness about the risks posed by voting online.\nAcknowledgments. The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their astute observations and criticism. For their helpful comments, we thank our senior colleagues at HSE University: A. S. Akhremenko, K. L. Marquardt, and M. G. Mironyuk.","PeriodicalId":284552,"journal":{"name":"The monitoring of public opinion economic&social changes","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not Unique, not Universal: Risk Perception and Acceptance of Online Voting Technology by Russian Citizens\",\"authors\":\"Valeria V. Babayan, Aleksey V. Turobov\",\"doi\":\"10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What is the connection between Russian citizens' perception of Internet voting and the context of its top down adoption with their readiness to use it? To investigate this question, we use Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to account for both observed and latent indicators of technology adoption and their linkage with the Internet voting use intent. The authors use survey evidence from VCIOM (2020) and a national survey of Internet users conducted by Online Marketing Intelligence (OMI) company in 2021. This study provides some support to the application of theoretical expectations formulated in the context of Western democracies to the Russian population's voting technology attitudes. The findings indicate that the use of the Internet is not a robust measure of technology acceptance anymore, and a more nuanced approach to the experiences of Internet usage is needed. Internet users appear to be more concerned about privacy, the possibility of fraud, and external interference than the respondents drawn from the overall population. The authors suggest that it is due to acceptance of risks seeming inevitable and to bigger digital literacy and therefore awareness about the risks posed by voting online.\\nAcknowledgments. The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their astute observations and criticism. For their helpful comments, we thank our senior colleagues at HSE University: A. S. Akhremenko, K. L. Marquardt, and M. G. Mironyuk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The monitoring of public opinion economic&social changes\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The monitoring of public opinion economic&social changes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The monitoring of public opinion economic&social changes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
俄罗斯公民对互联网投票的看法与自上而下采用的背景与他们是否愿意使用它之间有什么联系?为了研究这个问题,我们使用结构方程模型(SEM)来解释技术采用的观察和潜在指标及其与互联网投票使用意图的联系。作者使用了VCIOM(2020)的调查证据和在线营销情报(OMI)公司在2021年进行的全国互联网用户调查。本研究为在西方民主背景下制定的理论期望应用于俄罗斯人口的投票技术态度提供了一些支持。研究结果表明,互联网的使用不再是衡量技术接受程度的有力指标,需要一种更细致入微的方法来衡量互联网的使用体验。与总体受访者相比,互联网用户似乎更关心隐私、欺诈的可能性和外部干扰。作者认为,这是由于接受了似乎不可避免的风险,以及更大的数字素养,从而意识到在线投票带来的风险。作者感谢匿名评论者敏锐的观察和批评。感谢HSE大学的资深同事A. S. Akhremenko、K. L. Marquardt和M. G. Mironyuk的宝贵意见。
Not Unique, not Universal: Risk Perception and Acceptance of Online Voting Technology by Russian Citizens
What is the connection between Russian citizens' perception of Internet voting and the context of its top down adoption with their readiness to use it? To investigate this question, we use Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to account for both observed and latent indicators of technology adoption and their linkage with the Internet voting use intent. The authors use survey evidence from VCIOM (2020) and a national survey of Internet users conducted by Online Marketing Intelligence (OMI) company in 2021. This study provides some support to the application of theoretical expectations formulated in the context of Western democracies to the Russian population's voting technology attitudes. The findings indicate that the use of the Internet is not a robust measure of technology acceptance anymore, and a more nuanced approach to the experiences of Internet usage is needed. Internet users appear to be more concerned about privacy, the possibility of fraud, and external interference than the respondents drawn from the overall population. The authors suggest that it is due to acceptance of risks seeming inevitable and to bigger digital literacy and therefore awareness about the risks posed by voting online.
Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their astute observations and criticism. For their helpful comments, we thank our senior colleagues at HSE University: A. S. Akhremenko, K. L. Marquardt, and M. G. Mironyuk.