Ó. Barrera, A. Leiva, C. Martínez-Toledano, Álvaro ZÚÑIGA-CORDERO
{"title":"1952-2019年阿根廷、智利、哥斯达黎加、哥伦比亚、墨西哥和秘鲁的社会不平等、身份认同和政治分裂结构","authors":"Ó. Barrera, A. Leiva, C. Martínez-Toledano, Álvaro ZÚÑIGA-CORDERO","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv209xnfn.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper combines electoral surveys to analyze the transformation of the structure of political cleavages in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico and Peru over the last decades. We document that Latin American countries are characterized by personalist leaderships (e.g., Fujimori in Peru, Uribe in Colombia) and important historical cleavages (e.g., anti vs. pro-PLN in Costa Rica) that blur class-based voting patterns and have led in some cases to the emergence of competing pro-poor and ethnic-based competing coalitions (e.g., PRN-PLN in Costa Rica, Fujimori-Humala in Peru) over the last decades. The party systems of Costa Rica, Colombia and Peru have thus generated volatile political socio-economic cleavages, while in the more institutionalized party systems of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico they have been less volatile. *Oscar Barrera (World Inequality Lab): odbarrera@gmail.com; Ana Leiva (University of Oslo, UiO): leiva.vernengo@econ.uio.no; Clara Martínez-Toledano (Imperial College London, World Inequality Lab): c.martinez-toledano@imperial.ac.uk; Álvaro Zúñiga-Cordero (Paris School of Economics, World Inequality Lab): a.zuniga-cordero@psemail.eu. We are grateful to Lavih Abraham, Ronald Alfaro-Redondo, María Julia Blanco, Francesco Bogliacino, Nicolás Dvoskin, Ignacio Flores, Gustavo García, Amory Gethin, Kyong Mazaro and Thomas Piketty for their useful advice.","PeriodicalId":337220,"journal":{"name":"Political Cleavages and Social Inequalities","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Inequalities, Identity, and the Structure of Political Cleavages in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, 1952–2019\",\"authors\":\"Ó. Barrera, A. Leiva, C. Martínez-Toledano, Álvaro ZÚÑIGA-CORDERO\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv209xnfn.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper combines electoral surveys to analyze the transformation of the structure of political cleavages in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico and Peru over the last decades. We document that Latin American countries are characterized by personalist leaderships (e.g., Fujimori in Peru, Uribe in Colombia) and important historical cleavages (e.g., anti vs. pro-PLN in Costa Rica) that blur class-based voting patterns and have led in some cases to the emergence of competing pro-poor and ethnic-based competing coalitions (e.g., PRN-PLN in Costa Rica, Fujimori-Humala in Peru) over the last decades. The party systems of Costa Rica, Colombia and Peru have thus generated volatile political socio-economic cleavages, while in the more institutionalized party systems of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico they have been less volatile. *Oscar Barrera (World Inequality Lab): odbarrera@gmail.com; Ana Leiva (University of Oslo, UiO): leiva.vernengo@econ.uio.no; Clara Martínez-Toledano (Imperial College London, World Inequality Lab): c.martinez-toledano@imperial.ac.uk; Álvaro Zúñiga-Cordero (Paris School of Economics, World Inequality Lab): a.zuniga-cordero@psemail.eu. We are grateful to Lavih Abraham, Ronald Alfaro-Redondo, María Julia Blanco, Francesco Bogliacino, Nicolás Dvoskin, Ignacio Flores, Gustavo García, Amory Gethin, Kyong Mazaro and Thomas Piketty for their useful advice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Cleavages and Social Inequalities\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Cleavages and Social Inequalities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv209xnfn.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Cleavages and Social Inequalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv209xnfn.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文结合选举调查分析了阿根廷、智利、哥斯达黎加、哥伦比亚、墨西哥和秘鲁在过去几十年里政治分裂结构的变化。我们记录了拉丁美洲国家的特点是个人主义领导(例如秘鲁的藤森,哥伦比亚的乌里韦)和重要的历史分裂(例如哥斯达黎加的反与亲pln),这些分裂模糊了基于阶级的投票模式,并在某些情况下导致了亲穷人和基于种族的竞争联盟的出现(例如哥斯达黎加的PRN-PLN,秘鲁的藤森-乌马拉)。因此,哥斯达黎加、哥伦比亚和秘鲁的政党制度造成了不稳定的政治社会经济分裂,而阿根廷、巴西、智利和墨西哥较为制度化的政党制度则不那么不稳定。*Oscar Barrera(世界不平等实验室):odbarrera@gmail.com;Ana Leiva(奥斯陆大学,奥斯陆):leiva.vernengo@econ.uio.no;Clara Martínez-Toledano(伦敦帝国学院,世界不平等实验室):c.martinez-toledano@imperial.ac.uk;Álvaro Zúñiga-Cordero(巴黎经济学院,世界不平等实验室):a.zuniga-cordero@psemail.eu。我们感谢拉维·亚伯拉罕、罗纳德·阿尔法罗-雷东多、María Julia Blanco、Francesco Bogliacino、Nicolás德沃斯金、伊格纳西奥·弗洛雷斯、古斯塔沃García、Amory Gethin、京·马扎罗和托马斯·皮凯蒂提出的有益建议。
Social Inequalities, Identity, and the Structure of Political Cleavages in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, 1952–2019
This paper combines electoral surveys to analyze the transformation of the structure of political cleavages in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico and Peru over the last decades. We document that Latin American countries are characterized by personalist leaderships (e.g., Fujimori in Peru, Uribe in Colombia) and important historical cleavages (e.g., anti vs. pro-PLN in Costa Rica) that blur class-based voting patterns and have led in some cases to the emergence of competing pro-poor and ethnic-based competing coalitions (e.g., PRN-PLN in Costa Rica, Fujimori-Humala in Peru) over the last decades. The party systems of Costa Rica, Colombia and Peru have thus generated volatile political socio-economic cleavages, while in the more institutionalized party systems of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico they have been less volatile. *Oscar Barrera (World Inequality Lab): odbarrera@gmail.com; Ana Leiva (University of Oslo, UiO): leiva.vernengo@econ.uio.no; Clara Martínez-Toledano (Imperial College London, World Inequality Lab): c.martinez-toledano@imperial.ac.uk; Álvaro Zúñiga-Cordero (Paris School of Economics, World Inequality Lab): a.zuniga-cordero@psemail.eu. We are grateful to Lavih Abraham, Ronald Alfaro-Redondo, María Julia Blanco, Francesco Bogliacino, Nicolás Dvoskin, Ignacio Flores, Gustavo García, Amory Gethin, Kyong Mazaro and Thomas Piketty for their useful advice.