跟随大白兔:基于风险分析结果的完整性验证

Christine Jakobs, Matthias Werner, Karsten Schmidt, Gerhard Hansch
{"title":"跟随大白兔:基于风险分析结果的完整性验证","authors":"Christine Jakobs, Matthias Werner, Karsten Schmidt, Gerhard Hansch","doi":"10.1145/3488904.3493377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security is a cross-cutting issue in the automotive development process. The nature of cross-cutting issues demands constant coordination between different stakeholders. Changes in the vehicle functionalities lead to reoccurring security analysis steps, rising the complexity of progress tracking. While those process steps are typically done on function level, the vehicle architecture has to be verified as a composite, too. This is mostly done late in the development process by testing. Thus, architectural mismatches between functionalities security demands are often revealed too late. Starting from the definition of integrity as a system property in the information flow, we present the link from the MoRA approach to the architectural modeling and analysis approach. Verifying the no command-up policy is transferred to the temporal logic TLA+ allowing an early and fast architecture verification.","PeriodicalId":332312,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Following the White Rabbit: Integrity Verification Based on Risk Analysis Results\",\"authors\":\"Christine Jakobs, Matthias Werner, Karsten Schmidt, Gerhard Hansch\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3488904.3493377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Security is a cross-cutting issue in the automotive development process. The nature of cross-cutting issues demands constant coordination between different stakeholders. Changes in the vehicle functionalities lead to reoccurring security analysis steps, rising the complexity of progress tracking. While those process steps are typically done on function level, the vehicle architecture has to be verified as a composite, too. This is mostly done late in the development process by testing. Thus, architectural mismatches between functionalities security demands are often revealed too late. Starting from the definition of integrity as a system property in the information flow, we present the link from the MoRA approach to the architectural modeling and analysis approach. Verifying the no command-up policy is transferred to the temporal logic TLA+ allowing an early and fast architecture verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488904.3493377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488904.3493377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

安全是汽车开发过程中的一个交叉问题。跨领域问题的性质要求不同利益相关者之间不断协调。车辆功能的变化导致重复出现安全分析步骤,增加了进度跟踪的复杂性。虽然这些流程步骤通常是在功能级别上完成的,但车辆架构也必须作为一个组合进行验证。这主要是在开发过程的后期通过测试完成的。因此,功能和安全需求之间的体系结构不匹配往往发现得太晚了。从完整性作为信息流中的系统属性的定义开始,我们提出了从MoRA方法到体系结构建模和分析方法的链接。验证无命令启动策略被转移到临时逻辑TLA+,从而允许早期和快速的体系结构验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Following the White Rabbit: Integrity Verification Based on Risk Analysis Results
Security is a cross-cutting issue in the automotive development process. The nature of cross-cutting issues demands constant coordination between different stakeholders. Changes in the vehicle functionalities lead to reoccurring security analysis steps, rising the complexity of progress tracking. While those process steps are typically done on function level, the vehicle architecture has to be verified as a composite, too. This is mostly done late in the development process by testing. Thus, architectural mismatches between functionalities security demands are often revealed too late. Starting from the definition of integrity as a system property in the information flow, we present the link from the MoRA approach to the architectural modeling and analysis approach. Verifying the no command-up policy is transferred to the temporal logic TLA+ allowing an early and fast architecture verification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of De-Identification Techniques for Privacy Preserving Data Analysis in Vehicular Data Sharing Improved Sensor Model for Realistic Synthetic Data Generation Proposing HEAVENS 2.0 – an automotive risk assessment model Following the White Rabbit: Integrity Verification Based on Risk Analysis Results Real-time Uncertainty Estimation Based On Intermediate Layer Variational Inference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1