报告门槛和控制缺陷类型的变化对股权分析师对未来财务报表可靠性评价的影响

S. Asare, A. Wright
{"title":"报告门槛和控制缺陷类型的变化对股权分析师对未来财务报表可靠性评价的影响","authors":"S. Asare, A. Wright","doi":"10.2308/AJPT-10237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY: We examine the joint effects of reporting threshold (more than remote versus reasonably possible) and type of control deficiency (entity level versus account specific) as described in the adverse report on internal controls on equity analysts' evaluation of the reliability of a company's future financial statements. We hypothesize that equity analysts interpret a “more than remote” threshold to mean a significantly lower likelihood than a “reasonable possibility” threshold. We also hypothesize that when the reporting threshold is more than remote, equity analysts who evaluate an entity level material weakness will indicate a higher likelihood of future material misstatements than those who evaluate an account specific material weakness. However, when the reporting threshold is reasonably possible, equity analysts will assess the same likelihood of future misstatements for both types of material weakness. The results from an experiment that employed 65 equity analysts support our hypotheses. Taken...","PeriodicalId":307321,"journal":{"name":"D'Amore-McKim: Accounting (Topic)","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Change in the Reporting Threshold and Type of Control Deficiency on Equity Analysts’ Evaluation of the Reliability of Future Financial Statements\",\"authors\":\"S. Asare, A. Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/AJPT-10237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY: We examine the joint effects of reporting threshold (more than remote versus reasonably possible) and type of control deficiency (entity level versus account specific) as described in the adverse report on internal controls on equity analysts' evaluation of the reliability of a company's future financial statements. We hypothesize that equity analysts interpret a “more than remote” threshold to mean a significantly lower likelihood than a “reasonable possibility” threshold. We also hypothesize that when the reporting threshold is more than remote, equity analysts who evaluate an entity level material weakness will indicate a higher likelihood of future material misstatements than those who evaluate an account specific material weakness. However, when the reporting threshold is reasonably possible, equity analysts will assess the same likelihood of future misstatements for both types of material weakness. The results from an experiment that employed 65 equity analysts support our hypotheses. Taken...\",\"PeriodicalId\":307321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"D'Amore-McKim: Accounting (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"D'Amore-McKim: Accounting (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-10237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"D'Amore-McKim: Accounting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-10237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

摘要:我们研究了内部控制不利报告中所描述的报告门槛(远高于合理可能)和控制缺陷类型(实体层面与特定账户)对股权分析师评估公司未来财务报表可靠性的联合影响。我们假设股票分析师将“超过远程”阈值解释为显著低于“合理可能性”阈值的可能性。我们还假设,当报告阈值超过遥远时,评估实体层面重大缺陷的股票分析师将比评估特定账户重大缺陷的股票分析师指出未来重大错报的可能性更高。然而,当报告阈值合理可能时,股票分析师将对两种类型的重大弱点评估未来错报的相同可能性。一项由65位股票分析师参与的实验结果支持了我们的假设。采取……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Change in the Reporting Threshold and Type of Control Deficiency on Equity Analysts’ Evaluation of the Reliability of Future Financial Statements
SUMMARY: We examine the joint effects of reporting threshold (more than remote versus reasonably possible) and type of control deficiency (entity level versus account specific) as described in the adverse report on internal controls on equity analysts' evaluation of the reliability of a company's future financial statements. We hypothesize that equity analysts interpret a “more than remote” threshold to mean a significantly lower likelihood than a “reasonable possibility” threshold. We also hypothesize that when the reporting threshold is more than remote, equity analysts who evaluate an entity level material weakness will indicate a higher likelihood of future material misstatements than those who evaluate an account specific material weakness. However, when the reporting threshold is reasonably possible, equity analysts will assess the same likelihood of future misstatements for both types of material weakness. The results from an experiment that employed 65 equity analysts support our hypotheses. Taken...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Change in the Reporting Threshold and Type of Control Deficiency on Equity Analysts’ Evaluation of the Reliability of Future Financial Statements Material Weakness Remediation and Earnings Quality: A Detailed Examination by Type of Control Deficiency Productivity-Target Difficulty, Performance-Based Pay and Outside-the-Box Thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1