凋亡指数不能预测乳腺癌的化疗反应

K. Siregar
{"title":"凋亡指数不能预测乳腺癌的化疗反应","authors":"K. Siregar","doi":"10.32734/SUMEJ.V2I2.1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) needs determination to prevent overtreatment with chemoresistance regimen. A total of 60 consented patients from Haji Adam Malik and Bunda Thamrin Hospital were included in this cohort prospectie study. Patients with heart, kidney, liver disease, history of surgery, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy were excluded. Apoptotic indexes were taken from all subjects before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 31 subjects (51.7%) did not show clinical response while 29 subjects (48.3%) had clinical response. There was no significant difference of apoptotic index before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5.47+1.38 vs 5.52+1.08 pg/mL). There was also no significant relationship between apoptosis index and clinical response (p=0.993). This study showed that apoptotic index fails to be neoadjuvant chemotherapy response predictor in triple negative breast cancer. Further research with larger samples is needed to confirm this result","PeriodicalId":184699,"journal":{"name":"Sumatera Medical Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apoptotic Index Fails to Predict Chemoresponse in Breast Cancer\",\"authors\":\"K. Siregar\",\"doi\":\"10.32734/SUMEJ.V2I2.1062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) needs determination to prevent overtreatment with chemoresistance regimen. A total of 60 consented patients from Haji Adam Malik and Bunda Thamrin Hospital were included in this cohort prospectie study. Patients with heart, kidney, liver disease, history of surgery, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy were excluded. Apoptotic indexes were taken from all subjects before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 31 subjects (51.7%) did not show clinical response while 29 subjects (48.3%) had clinical response. There was no significant difference of apoptotic index before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5.47+1.38 vs 5.52+1.08 pg/mL). There was also no significant relationship between apoptosis index and clinical response (p=0.993). This study showed that apoptotic index fails to be neoadjuvant chemotherapy response predictor in triple negative breast cancer. Further research with larger samples is needed to confirm this result\",\"PeriodicalId\":184699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sumatera Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sumatera Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32734/SUMEJ.V2I2.1062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sumatera Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/SUMEJ.V2I2.1062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)新辅助化疗的反应性需要确定,以防止化疗耐药方案过度治疗。来自Haji Adam Malik和Bunda Thamrin医院的60名患者被纳入这项队列前瞻性研究。排除有心脏、肾脏、肝脏疾病、手术史、化疗史或激素治疗史的患者。在新辅助化疗前后测定所有受试者的细胞凋亡指标。新辅助化疗3个周期后,31例(51.7%)患者无临床反应,29例(48.3%)患者有临床反应。新辅助化疗前后细胞凋亡指数差异无统计学意义(5.47+1.38 vs 5.52+1.08 pg/mL)。细胞凋亡指数与临床疗效无显著相关性(p=0.993)。本研究表明,凋亡指数不能作为三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应的预测指标。进一步的研究需要更大的样本来证实这一结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Apoptotic Index Fails to Predict Chemoresponse in Breast Cancer
The responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) needs determination to prevent overtreatment with chemoresistance regimen. A total of 60 consented patients from Haji Adam Malik and Bunda Thamrin Hospital were included in this cohort prospectie study. Patients with heart, kidney, liver disease, history of surgery, chemotherapy, or hormonal therapy were excluded. Apoptotic indexes were taken from all subjects before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 31 subjects (51.7%) did not show clinical response while 29 subjects (48.3%) had clinical response. There was no significant difference of apoptotic index before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5.47+1.38 vs 5.52+1.08 pg/mL). There was also no significant relationship between apoptosis index and clinical response (p=0.993). This study showed that apoptotic index fails to be neoadjuvant chemotherapy response predictor in triple negative breast cancer. Further research with larger samples is needed to confirm this result
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on Impact of Covid-19 on Job Performance & Job Satisfaction of Employees Engaged in WFH Culture Cerebral Toxoplasmosis and Latent Tuberculosis Infection in HIV Infected Patient Glucose to Complications: Understanding Secondary Effects in Diabetes Mellitus Unraveling the Complexities of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review A Natural Food Colourant from Dioscorea alata (Dandila) in Sri Lanka: Development, Storage Stability and Bio-active Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1