使用两种高可用性设计(复制技术)的经验

A. Bhide
{"title":"使用两种高可用性设计(复制技术)的经验","authors":"A. Bhide","doi":"10.1109/MRD.1992.242618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author compares two replication schemes designed to provide high availability in an efficient manner: HA-NFS and ARM. Both schemes use the primary copy method for replica control. Both schemes were designed with the goal of minimizing the overheads during failure-free operation. In a primary copy scheme these overheads primarily consist of updating the secondary replicas. The two schemes were designed for different applications; ARM for providing high availability in a Shared Nothing database system, HA-NFS for providing high availability in an NFS file server environment. They also differ in that the HA-NFS scheme uses dual-ported disks to provide high availability, the ARM scheme uses replication over a network. In spite of the seemingly major differences, the schemes have the same key conceptual idea viz. propagating updates asynchronously to remote replicas. In addition to this idea, HA-NFS uses an unusual hardware arrangement in the form of dual-ported disks to further lower the overhead of updating secondary replicas.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":314844,"journal":{"name":"[1992 Proceedings] Second Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences with two high availability designs (replication techniques)\",\"authors\":\"A. Bhide\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MRD.1992.242618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author compares two replication schemes designed to provide high availability in an efficient manner: HA-NFS and ARM. Both schemes use the primary copy method for replica control. Both schemes were designed with the goal of minimizing the overheads during failure-free operation. In a primary copy scheme these overheads primarily consist of updating the secondary replicas. The two schemes were designed for different applications; ARM for providing high availability in a Shared Nothing database system, HA-NFS for providing high availability in an NFS file server environment. They also differ in that the HA-NFS scheme uses dual-ported disks to provide high availability, the ARM scheme uses replication over a network. In spite of the seemingly major differences, the schemes have the same key conceptual idea viz. propagating updates asynchronously to remote replicas. In addition to this idea, HA-NFS uses an unusual hardware arrangement in the form of dual-ported disks to further lower the overhead of updating secondary replicas.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":314844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1992 Proceedings] Second Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1992 Proceedings] Second Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MRD.1992.242618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1992 Proceedings] Second Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MRD.1992.242618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

作者比较了两种旨在以高效方式提供高可用性的复制方案:HA-NFS和ARM。这两种方案都使用主复制方法来控制副本。这两种方案的设计目标都是在无故障运行期间最小化开销。在主复制方案中,这些开销主要包括更新辅助副本。这两种方案是为不同的应用而设计的;ARM在Shared Nothing数据库系统中提供高可用性,HA-NFS在NFS文件服务器环境中提供高可用性。它们的不同之处在于,HA-NFS方案使用双端口磁盘来提供高可用性,而ARM方案使用网络复制。尽管看起来有很大的不同,但这些方案具有相同的关键概念,即将更新异步传播到远程副本。除了这个想法之外,HA-NFS还使用了一种不同寻常的硬件安排,即双端口磁盘,以进一步降低更新辅助副本的开销
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences with two high availability designs (replication techniques)
The author compares two replication schemes designed to provide high availability in an efficient manner: HA-NFS and ARM. Both schemes use the primary copy method for replica control. Both schemes were designed with the goal of minimizing the overheads during failure-free operation. In a primary copy scheme these overheads primarily consist of updating the secondary replicas. The two schemes were designed for different applications; ARM for providing high availability in a Shared Nothing database system, HA-NFS for providing high availability in an NFS file server environment. They also differ in that the HA-NFS scheme uses dual-ported disks to provide high availability, the ARM scheme uses replication over a network. In spite of the seemingly major differences, the schemes have the same key conceptual idea viz. propagating updates asynchronously to remote replicas. In addition to this idea, HA-NFS uses an unusual hardware arrangement in the form of dual-ported disks to further lower the overhead of updating secondary replicas.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some consequences of excess load on the Echo replicated file system High availability is not enough (distributed systems) Protocol modularity in systems for managing replicated data An integrated approach to fault tolerance I/O performance of fully-replicated disk systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1