基于实时核酸序列扩增技术检测肠道病毒。

S. Jun, Kee-Hyung Sung, S. Song, K. Park, Hong-Bin Kim, Junghan Song, E. Choi, S. Park, E. Kim
{"title":"基于实时核酸序列扩增技术检测肠道病毒。","authors":"S. Jun, Kee-Hyung Sung, S. Song, K. Park, Hong-Bin Kim, Junghan Song, E. Choi, S. Park, E. Kim","doi":"10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Enteroviruses are the most frequent etiologic agents of aseptic meningitis and are estimated to be the cause of 70% to 90% of viral meningitis cases. Enterovirus diagnosis can be difficult because clinical features vary according to patient immunity and age. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay compared to that of the real-time nested RT-PCR assay for enterovirus detection. Methods: This study was performed on 96 patients suspected of aseptic meningitis based on clinical features. RNA was extracted using NucliSENS EasyMAG and real-time NASBA assay was performed using NucliSENS EasyQ Enterovirus and NucliSENS EasyQ Basic 2. We also executed in-house real-time nested RT-PCR assay for RNA extracted via QIAamp Viral RNA Mini. Results: The positive rate of real-time NASBA assay was 45.8% for enterovirus detection. The positive rate of first real-time reverse transcription PCR was 22.9% and the second real-time PCR was 57.3%. The concordant rate of the real-time NASBA assay and first real-time reverse transcription PCR was 75.0%. The concordant rate of the real-time NASBA assay and second real-time PCR was 86.5%. Conclusion: The detection of enteroviruses using the real-time NASBA assay is less prone to cross-contamination and is simple, without the need for reverse transcription. We conclude that the NASBA assay is an effective method for the rapid diagnosis of aseptic meningitis. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13: 53-58)","PeriodicalId":143093,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Enterovirus using Real-Time Nucleic Acid Sequence-based Amplification.\",\"authors\":\"S. Jun, Kee-Hyung Sung, S. Song, K. Park, Hong-Bin Kim, Junghan Song, E. Choi, S. Park, E. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Enteroviruses are the most frequent etiologic agents of aseptic meningitis and are estimated to be the cause of 70% to 90% of viral meningitis cases. Enterovirus diagnosis can be difficult because clinical features vary according to patient immunity and age. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay compared to that of the real-time nested RT-PCR assay for enterovirus detection. Methods: This study was performed on 96 patients suspected of aseptic meningitis based on clinical features. RNA was extracted using NucliSENS EasyMAG and real-time NASBA assay was performed using NucliSENS EasyQ Enterovirus and NucliSENS EasyQ Basic 2. We also executed in-house real-time nested RT-PCR assay for RNA extracted via QIAamp Viral RNA Mini. Results: The positive rate of real-time NASBA assay was 45.8% for enterovirus detection. The positive rate of first real-time reverse transcription PCR was 22.9% and the second real-time PCR was 57.3%. The concordant rate of the real-time NASBA assay and first real-time reverse transcription PCR was 75.0%. The concordant rate of the real-time NASBA assay and second real-time PCR was 86.5%. Conclusion: The detection of enteroviruses using the real-time NASBA assay is less prone to cross-contamination and is simple, without the need for reverse transcription. We conclude that the NASBA assay is an effective method for the rapid diagnosis of aseptic meningitis. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13: 53-58)\",\"PeriodicalId\":143093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠病毒是无菌性脑膜炎最常见的病原,估计70%至90%的病毒性脑膜炎病例是由肠病毒引起的。肠道病毒的诊断可能很困难,因为临床特征因患者免疫力和年龄而异。本研究的目的是评价实时核酸序列扩增(NASBA)法与实时巢式RT-PCR法检测肠道病毒的性能。方法:根据临床特点对96例疑似无菌性脑膜炎患者进行分析。采用NucliSENS EasyMAG提取RNA,采用NucliSENS EasyQ Enterovirus和NucliSENS EasyQ Basic 2进行实时NASBA检测。我们还对QIAamp病毒RNA Mini提取的RNA进行了内部实时嵌套RT-PCR检测。结果:实时NASBA法检测肠道病毒阳性率为45.8%。第一次实时反转录PCR阳性率为22.9%,第二次实时反转录PCR阳性率为57.3%。实时NASBA检测与第一次实时反转录PCR的符合率为75.0%。实时NASBA检测与二次实时PCR的符合率为86.5%。结论:实时NASBA法检测肠道病毒具有交叉污染少、操作简单、不需要反转录等优点。结论:NASBA检测是一种快速诊断无菌性脑膜炎的有效方法。(中华临床微生物学杂志2010;13:53-58)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of Enterovirus using Real-Time Nucleic Acid Sequence-based Amplification.
Background: Enteroviruses are the most frequent etiologic agents of aseptic meningitis and are estimated to be the cause of 70% to 90% of viral meningitis cases. Enterovirus diagnosis can be difficult because clinical features vary according to patient immunity and age. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay compared to that of the real-time nested RT-PCR assay for enterovirus detection. Methods: This study was performed on 96 patients suspected of aseptic meningitis based on clinical features. RNA was extracted using NucliSENS EasyMAG and real-time NASBA assay was performed using NucliSENS EasyQ Enterovirus and NucliSENS EasyQ Basic 2. We also executed in-house real-time nested RT-PCR assay for RNA extracted via QIAamp Viral RNA Mini. Results: The positive rate of real-time NASBA assay was 45.8% for enterovirus detection. The positive rate of first real-time reverse transcription PCR was 22.9% and the second real-time PCR was 57.3%. The concordant rate of the real-time NASBA assay and first real-time reverse transcription PCR was 75.0%. The concordant rate of the real-time NASBA assay and second real-time PCR was 86.5%. Conclusion: The detection of enteroviruses using the real-time NASBA assay is less prone to cross-contamination and is simple, without the need for reverse transcription. We conclude that the NASBA assay is an effective method for the rapid diagnosis of aseptic meningitis. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13: 53-58)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity of Integrons Carrying blaVIM-2 Cassette in Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. A Case of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Caused by Arcanobacterium haemolyticum and Streptococcus agalactiae Haemophilus parainfluenzae Infective Endocarditis Confirmed by 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis from Culture Negative Tissue An Unusual Feature of Malaria: Exflagellated Microgametes of Malarial Parasites in Human Peripheral Blood Lung Abscess and Bacteremia Caused by Neisseria flavescens and Streptococcus sanguis in Patient with Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1