基于市场风险的资本要求、交易活动和银行风险

Dmytro Holod, Yuriy Kitsul, Gokhan Torna
{"title":"基于市场风险的资本要求、交易活动和银行风险","authors":"Dmytro Holod, Yuriy Kitsul, Gokhan Torna","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2846409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates if market risk-based capital requirements (MRR) implemented in 1998 mitigated bank risk associated with trading activities. Recognizing that only banks with sufficiently high trading activities are subject to the MRR (regulated), we implement a difference-in-difference (DID) approach to show that in the post-MRR period, unregulated banks experienced an increase in risk associated with trading activity, while their regulated counterparts enjoyed no appreciable change in trading-related risk. We interpret the resulting negative DID coefficient as evidence of a risk-mitigating effect of the MRR. We also show that upon the implementation of the MRR, unregulated banks exhibit a significantly larger increase in contribution of opaque trading activity to bid-ask spreads, compared to regulated banks, for which the association between trading activity and bid-ask spreads actually declines. Our results are consistent with the view that the MRR significantly reduced moral hazard and adverse selection problems associated with opaque trading activities.The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Reserve System, or their staff.","PeriodicalId":187811,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Risk-Based Capital Requirements, Trading Activity, and Bank Risk\",\"authors\":\"Dmytro Holod, Yuriy Kitsul, Gokhan Torna\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2846409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates if market risk-based capital requirements (MRR) implemented in 1998 mitigated bank risk associated with trading activities. Recognizing that only banks with sufficiently high trading activities are subject to the MRR (regulated), we implement a difference-in-difference (DID) approach to show that in the post-MRR period, unregulated banks experienced an increase in risk associated with trading activity, while their regulated counterparts enjoyed no appreciable change in trading-related risk. We interpret the resulting negative DID coefficient as evidence of a risk-mitigating effect of the MRR. We also show that upon the implementation of the MRR, unregulated banks exhibit a significantly larger increase in contribution of opaque trading activity to bid-ask spreads, compared to regulated banks, for which the association between trading activity and bid-ask spreads actually declines. Our results are consistent with the view that the MRR significantly reduced moral hazard and adverse selection problems associated with opaque trading activities.The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Reserve System, or their staff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2846409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2846409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本研究调查了1998年实施的基于市场风险的资本要求(MRR)是否减轻了与交易活动相关的银行风险。认识到只有交易活动足够高的银行才受到MRR(监管)的约束,我们实施了一个差中差(DID)方法来表明,在MRR后的时期,不受监管的银行经历了与交易活动相关的风险增加,而受监管的银行在交易相关的风险方面没有明显的变化。我们将由此产生的负DID系数解释为MRR风险缓解效应的证据。我们还表明,在实施MRR后,与受监管的银行相比,不受监管的银行表现出不透明交易活动对买卖价差的贡献显著增加,而受监管的银行的交易活动和买卖价差之间的关联实际上有所下降。我们的研究结果与MRR显著降低与不透明交易活动相关的道德风险和逆向选择问题的观点一致。本文中表达的观点仅代表作者的观点,并不一定反映联邦储备系统理事会、联邦储备系统或其工作人员的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Market Risk-Based Capital Requirements, Trading Activity, and Bank Risk
This study investigates if market risk-based capital requirements (MRR) implemented in 1998 mitigated bank risk associated with trading activities. Recognizing that only banks with sufficiently high trading activities are subject to the MRR (regulated), we implement a difference-in-difference (DID) approach to show that in the post-MRR period, unregulated banks experienced an increase in risk associated with trading activity, while their regulated counterparts enjoyed no appreciable change in trading-related risk. We interpret the resulting negative DID coefficient as evidence of a risk-mitigating effect of the MRR. We also show that upon the implementation of the MRR, unregulated banks exhibit a significantly larger increase in contribution of opaque trading activity to bid-ask spreads, compared to regulated banks, for which the association between trading activity and bid-ask spreads actually declines. Our results are consistent with the view that the MRR significantly reduced moral hazard and adverse selection problems associated with opaque trading activities.The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Reserve System, or their staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Euro Area Banks' Interest Rate Risk Exposure to Level, Slope and Curvature Swings in the Yield Curve 15 Seconds to Alpha: Higher frequency risk pricing for commercial real estate securities Bank Signaling, Risk of Runs, and the Informational Impact of Prudential Regulations Climate Default Swap – Disentangling the Exposure to Transition Risk Through CDS Sovereign Risk, Credit Shocks and R&D
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1