几种萃取剂对污染粘土中重金属的去除效果比较

K. Reddy, S. Chinthamreddy
{"title":"几种萃取剂对污染粘土中重金属的去除效果比较","authors":"K. Reddy, S. Chinthamreddy","doi":"10.1080/10588330091134347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the removal of heavy metals from contaminated clayey soils by soil washing using various extractants. Two clayey soils, kaolin, a low buffering soil with pH of 5, and glacial till, a high buffering soil with pH of 8, were used to represent various soil conditions. These soils were spiked with chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and cadmium (Cd) to simulate improper disposal of typical electroplating waste constituents. The following extracting solutions were investigated for the removal of heavy metals from the soils: deionized water, distilled water, and tap water; acetic acid and phosphoric acid; chelating agents ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citric acid; and the oxidizing agents potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide. The effect of extractant concentration on removal of heavy metals was also investigated. Complete removal of Cr was achieved using 0.1 M potassium permanganate for kaolin, while a maximum of 54% was removed from glacial till. A maximum Ni removal of 80% was achieved using tapwater for kaolin, while a maximum removal of 48 to 52% was achieved using either 1 M acetic acid or 0.1 M citric acid for glacial till. A maximum Cd removal of 50% was achieved using any of the extractants for kaolin, while a maximum removal of 45 to 48% was obtained using either acids or chelating agents for glacial till. Overall, this study showed that complete removal of Cr, Ni, and Cd from clayey soils is difficult to achieve using the soil-washing process, and also the use of one extractant may not be effective in removing all metals. A sequential extraction using different extractants may be needed for the removal of multiple metal contaminants from clayey soils.","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"100","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Extractants for Removing Heavy Metals from Contaminated Clayey Soils\",\"authors\":\"K. Reddy, S. Chinthamreddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10588330091134347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes the removal of heavy metals from contaminated clayey soils by soil washing using various extractants. Two clayey soils, kaolin, a low buffering soil with pH of 5, and glacial till, a high buffering soil with pH of 8, were used to represent various soil conditions. These soils were spiked with chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and cadmium (Cd) to simulate improper disposal of typical electroplating waste constituents. The following extracting solutions were investigated for the removal of heavy metals from the soils: deionized water, distilled water, and tap water; acetic acid and phosphoric acid; chelating agents ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citric acid; and the oxidizing agents potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide. The effect of extractant concentration on removal of heavy metals was also investigated. Complete removal of Cr was achieved using 0.1 M potassium permanganate for kaolin, while a maximum of 54% was removed from glacial till. A maximum Ni removal of 80% was achieved using tapwater for kaolin, while a maximum removal of 48 to 52% was achieved using either 1 M acetic acid or 0.1 M citric acid for glacial till. A maximum Cd removal of 50% was achieved using any of the extractants for kaolin, while a maximum removal of 45 to 48% was obtained using either acids or chelating agents for glacial till. Overall, this study showed that complete removal of Cr, Ni, and Cd from clayey soils is difficult to achieve using the soil-washing process, and also the use of one extractant may not be effective in removing all metals. A sequential extraction using different extractants may be needed for the removal of multiple metal contaminants from clayey soils.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"volume\":\"154 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"100\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100

摘要

本文介绍了利用各种萃取剂对污染粘土进行洗土去除重金属的方法。两种粘土,高岭土,低缓冲土壤,pH值为5,冰碛土,高缓冲土壤,pH值为8,代表不同的土壤条件。这些土壤中添加了铬(Cr)、镍(Ni)和镉(Cd),以模拟典型电镀废物成分的不当处理。研究了去离子水、蒸馏水和自来水对土壤重金属的去除效果;醋酸和磷酸;螯合剂乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和柠檬酸;还有氧化剂高锰酸钾和过氧化氢。考察了萃取剂浓度对重金属去除率的影响。高岭土用0.1 M高锰酸钾可完全脱除Cr,而冰耕法最高可脱除54%。用自来水处理高岭土,镍的去除率最高可达80%,而用1 M醋酸或0.1 M柠檬酸处理冰碛物,镍的去除率最高可达48%至52%。使用任何一种萃取剂对高岭土的Cd去除率最高可达50%,而使用酸或螯合剂对冰碛物的Cd去除率最高可达45%至48%。总的来说,本研究表明,使用土壤洗涤工艺很难完全去除粘土中的Cr, Ni和Cd,并且使用一种萃取剂可能无法有效去除所有金属。为了从粘土中去除多种金属污染物,可能需要使用不同的萃取剂进行顺序萃取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Extractants for Removing Heavy Metals from Contaminated Clayey Soils
This article describes the removal of heavy metals from contaminated clayey soils by soil washing using various extractants. Two clayey soils, kaolin, a low buffering soil with pH of 5, and glacial till, a high buffering soil with pH of 8, were used to represent various soil conditions. These soils were spiked with chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and cadmium (Cd) to simulate improper disposal of typical electroplating waste constituents. The following extracting solutions were investigated for the removal of heavy metals from the soils: deionized water, distilled water, and tap water; acetic acid and phosphoric acid; chelating agents ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citric acid; and the oxidizing agents potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide. The effect of extractant concentration on removal of heavy metals was also investigated. Complete removal of Cr was achieved using 0.1 M potassium permanganate for kaolin, while a maximum of 54% was removed from glacial till. A maximum Ni removal of 80% was achieved using tapwater for kaolin, while a maximum removal of 48 to 52% was achieved using either 1 M acetic acid or 0.1 M citric acid for glacial till. A maximum Cd removal of 50% was achieved using any of the extractants for kaolin, while a maximum removal of 45 to 48% was obtained using either acids or chelating agents for glacial till. Overall, this study showed that complete removal of Cr, Ni, and Cd from clayey soils is difficult to achieve using the soil-washing process, and also the use of one extractant may not be effective in removing all metals. A sequential extraction using different extractants may be needed for the removal of multiple metal contaminants from clayey soils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Explosives at the Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Settlement Prediction for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Using Power Creep Law Quantification of Compositional Changes of Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID and GC/MS during a Long-Term Bioremediation Experiment A Method for Assessing Leaching Potential for Petroleum Hydrocarbons Release Sites: Multiphase and Multisubstance Equilibrium Partitioning Monte Carlo Vadose Zone Model for Soil Remedial Criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1