多曝光高动态范围成像去重影算法比较

Kanita Karaduzovic Hadziabdic, Jasminka Hasic Telalovic, Rafał K. Mantiuk
{"title":"多曝光高动态范围成像去重影算法比较","authors":"Kanita Karaduzovic Hadziabdic, Jasminka Hasic Telalovic, Rafał K. Mantiuk","doi":"10.1145/2508244.2508247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High dynamic range (HDR) images can be generated by capturing a sequence of low dynamic range (LDR) images of the same scene with different exposures and then merging those images to create an HDR image. During capturing of LDR images, any changes in the scene or slightest camera movement results in ghost artifacts in the resultant HDR image. Over the past few years many algorithms have been proposed to produce ghost free HDR images of dynamic scenes. In this study we performed subjective psychophysical experiments to evaluate four algorithms for removing ghost artifacts in the final HDR image. To our best knowledge, no evaluation of deghosting algorithms for HDR imaging has been published. Thus, the aim of this paper is not only to evaluate different ghost removal algorithms but also to introduce a methodology to evaluate such algorithms and to present some of the challenges that exist in evaluating ghost removal algorithms in HDR images. Optical flow algorithms have been shown to produce successful results in aligning input images before merging them into an HDR image. As a result one of the state-of-the-art deghosting algorithm for HDR image alignment is based on optical flow. To test the limits of the evaluated deghosting algorithms the scenes used in our experiments were selected following the criteria proposed by Baker et al. [2011], which is considered as de facto standard for evaluating optical flow methodologies. The scenes used in the experiments serve to provide challenges that need to be dealt with by not only algorithms based on optical flow methodologies but also by other ghost removal algorithms for HDR imaging. The results reveal the scenes for which the evaluated algorithms fail and may serve as a guide for future research in this area.","PeriodicalId":235681,"journal":{"name":"Spring conference on Computer graphics","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Deghosting Algorithms for Multi-exposure High Dynamic Range Imaging\",\"authors\":\"Kanita Karaduzovic Hadziabdic, Jasminka Hasic Telalovic, Rafał K. Mantiuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2508244.2508247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High dynamic range (HDR) images can be generated by capturing a sequence of low dynamic range (LDR) images of the same scene with different exposures and then merging those images to create an HDR image. During capturing of LDR images, any changes in the scene or slightest camera movement results in ghost artifacts in the resultant HDR image. Over the past few years many algorithms have been proposed to produce ghost free HDR images of dynamic scenes. In this study we performed subjective psychophysical experiments to evaluate four algorithms for removing ghost artifacts in the final HDR image. To our best knowledge, no evaluation of deghosting algorithms for HDR imaging has been published. Thus, the aim of this paper is not only to evaluate different ghost removal algorithms but also to introduce a methodology to evaluate such algorithms and to present some of the challenges that exist in evaluating ghost removal algorithms in HDR images. Optical flow algorithms have been shown to produce successful results in aligning input images before merging them into an HDR image. As a result one of the state-of-the-art deghosting algorithm for HDR image alignment is based on optical flow. To test the limits of the evaluated deghosting algorithms the scenes used in our experiments were selected following the criteria proposed by Baker et al. [2011], which is considered as de facto standard for evaluating optical flow methodologies. The scenes used in the experiments serve to provide challenges that need to be dealt with by not only algorithms based on optical flow methodologies but also by other ghost removal algorithms for HDR imaging. The results reveal the scenes for which the evaluated algorithms fail and may serve as a guide for future research in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spring conference on Computer graphics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spring conference on Computer graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2508244.2508247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spring conference on Computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2508244.2508247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

高动态范围(HDR)图像可以通过捕捉同一场景的一系列低动态范围(LDR)图像以不同的曝光,然后合并这些图像来生成HDR图像。在捕获LDR图像期间,场景中的任何变化或最轻微的相机运动都会导致最终HDR图像中的幽灵伪影。在过去的几年里,人们提出了许多算法来产生动态场景的无鬼HDR图像。在这项研究中,我们进行了主观心理物理实验,以评估四种算法去除最终HDR图像中的幽灵伪影。据我们所知,目前还没有关于HDR成像去重影算法的评价。因此,本文的目的不仅是评估不同的鬼影去除算法,而且还介绍了一种评估这些算法的方法,并提出了评估HDR图像中鬼影去除算法存在的一些挑战。在将输入图像合并为HDR图像之前,光流算法已被证明可以产生成功的结果。因此,最先进的去重影算法之一的HDR图像对齐是基于光流。为了测试所评估的去重影算法的局限性,我们的实验中使用的场景是根据Baker等人[2011]提出的标准选择的,该标准被认为是评估光流方法的事实上的标准。实验中使用的场景提供了挑战,不仅需要基于光流方法的算法,还需要其他HDR成像的幽灵去除算法来处理。结果揭示了评估算法失败的场景,并可能为该领域的未来研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Deghosting Algorithms for Multi-exposure High Dynamic Range Imaging
High dynamic range (HDR) images can be generated by capturing a sequence of low dynamic range (LDR) images of the same scene with different exposures and then merging those images to create an HDR image. During capturing of LDR images, any changes in the scene or slightest camera movement results in ghost artifacts in the resultant HDR image. Over the past few years many algorithms have been proposed to produce ghost free HDR images of dynamic scenes. In this study we performed subjective psychophysical experiments to evaluate four algorithms for removing ghost artifacts in the final HDR image. To our best knowledge, no evaluation of deghosting algorithms for HDR imaging has been published. Thus, the aim of this paper is not only to evaluate different ghost removal algorithms but also to introduce a methodology to evaluate such algorithms and to present some of the challenges that exist in evaluating ghost removal algorithms in HDR images. Optical flow algorithms have been shown to produce successful results in aligning input images before merging them into an HDR image. As a result one of the state-of-the-art deghosting algorithm for HDR image alignment is based on optical flow. To test the limits of the evaluated deghosting algorithms the scenes used in our experiments were selected following the criteria proposed by Baker et al. [2011], which is considered as de facto standard for evaluating optical flow methodologies. The scenes used in the experiments serve to provide challenges that need to be dealt with by not only algorithms based on optical flow methodologies but also by other ghost removal algorithms for HDR imaging. The results reveal the scenes for which the evaluated algorithms fail and may serve as a guide for future research in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smoothing in 3D with reference points and polynomials Green's function solution to subsurface light transport for BRDF computation Doppler-based 3D Blood Flow Imaging and Visualization Parallel MDOM for light transport in participating media Dynamic Texture Enlargement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1