波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那

J. Bugajski
{"title":"波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那","authors":"J. Bugajski","doi":"10.4324/9781003075523-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) was signed in 1995, nationalistic parties have dominated the political scene in BosniaHerzegovina. The local elections held in 2016 and the general elections of 2018 show these tendencies. The outcomes of these elections show no real shift, especially as there is a tendency to vote along ethnic lines and for nationalistic parties. The situation in the country is not very stable, however: Serbs and Croats are working together towards further federalisation of the country. The third ethnic group, Bosniaks, are heavily opposed to this initiative. With regards to the EU integration, Bosnia-Herzegovina is lagging behind other countries in the Western Balkans, because it is unable to implement the requested reforms. Under the current constitution, established in the DPA, the decision-making process follows ethnic lines. This causes a complex system of national and entity-level decision making, making it very hard to find consensus needed to work on further EU integration.","PeriodicalId":127621,"journal":{"name":"Political Parties of Eastern Europe","volume":"109 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bosnia-Herzegovina\",\"authors\":\"J. Bugajski\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003075523-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) was signed in 1995, nationalistic parties have dominated the political scene in BosniaHerzegovina. The local elections held in 2016 and the general elections of 2018 show these tendencies. The outcomes of these elections show no real shift, especially as there is a tendency to vote along ethnic lines and for nationalistic parties. The situation in the country is not very stable, however: Serbs and Croats are working together towards further federalisation of the country. The third ethnic group, Bosniaks, are heavily opposed to this initiative. With regards to the EU integration, Bosnia-Herzegovina is lagging behind other countries in the Western Balkans, because it is unable to implement the requested reforms. Under the current constitution, established in the DPA, the decision-making process follows ethnic lines. This causes a complex system of national and entity-level decision making, making it very hard to find consensus needed to work on further EU integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Parties of Eastern Europe\",\"volume\":\"109 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Parties of Eastern Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075523-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Parties of Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075523-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1995年签署《代顿和平协定》以来,民族主义政党一直主导着波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的政治舞台。2016年的地方选举和2018年的总选都表现出这种趋势。这些选举的结果并没有显示出真正的转变,特别是因为人们倾向于按照种族界线和民族主义政党投票。然而,该国的局势并不十分稳定:塞尔维亚人和克罗地亚人正在共同努力,使该国进一步联邦化。第三个民族,波斯尼亚人,强烈反对这一倡议。在欧盟一体化方面,波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那落后于西巴尔干的其他国家,因为它无法执行所要求的改革。根据DPA制定的现行宪法,决策过程遵循民族界限。这导致国家和实体层面的决策形成了一个复杂的体系,很难找到进一步推动欧盟一体化所需的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Since the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) was signed in 1995, nationalistic parties have dominated the political scene in BosniaHerzegovina. The local elections held in 2016 and the general elections of 2018 show these tendencies. The outcomes of these elections show no real shift, especially as there is a tendency to vote along ethnic lines and for nationalistic parties. The situation in the country is not very stable, however: Serbs and Croats are working together towards further federalisation of the country. The third ethnic group, Bosniaks, are heavily opposed to this initiative. With regards to the EU integration, Bosnia-Herzegovina is lagging behind other countries in the Western Balkans, because it is unable to implement the requested reforms. Under the current constitution, established in the DPA, the decision-making process follows ethnic lines. This causes a complex system of national and entity-level decision making, making it very hard to find consensus needed to work on further EU integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Slovenia Latvia Poland Macedonia Kosova
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1