美国合伙企业的国际税收待遇:基于政策的方法

David L. Forst
{"title":"美国合伙企业的国际税收待遇:基于政策的方法","authors":"David L. Forst","doi":"10.15779/Z38W93N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the use of partnerships as vehicles for international investment has increased, corresponding attention has been given to the U.S. tax issues associated with international partnerships.' The resolution of these tax issues, however, can be elusive. Tax treatment is often uncertain because entities that the U.S. treats as partnerships are chameleon-like. Although the distinguishing feature of a partnership (as opposed to a corporation) under U.S. tax law is that its profits and losses are recognized by its individual partners, in the analysis of subtler issues it is often unclear whether a partnership should be viewed as a mere aggregate of its partners or as a separate, stand-alone entity. Uncertain tax treatment also arises in the international context with respect to hybrid entities-the situation where one nation characterizes an entity as a partnership while another nation characterizes it as a corporation.' These issues have become more prominent since the IRS issued regulations that permit taxpayers to elect whether most domestic unincorporated business associations and many foreign business associations should be treated for federal tax purposes as corporations or partnerships (or in some cases as branches). 3","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The U.S. International Tax Treatment of Partnerships: A Policy-Based Approach\",\"authors\":\"David L. Forst\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38W93N\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the use of partnerships as vehicles for international investment has increased, corresponding attention has been given to the U.S. tax issues associated with international partnerships.' The resolution of these tax issues, however, can be elusive. Tax treatment is often uncertain because entities that the U.S. treats as partnerships are chameleon-like. Although the distinguishing feature of a partnership (as opposed to a corporation) under U.S. tax law is that its profits and losses are recognized by its individual partners, in the analysis of subtler issues it is often unclear whether a partnership should be viewed as a mere aggregate of its partners or as a separate, stand-alone entity. Uncertain tax treatment also arises in the international context with respect to hybrid entities-the situation where one nation characterizes an entity as a partnership while another nation characterizes it as a corporation.' These issues have become more prominent since the IRS issued regulations that permit taxpayers to elect whether most domestic unincorporated business associations and many foreign business associations should be treated for federal tax purposes as corporations or partnerships (or in some cases as branches). 3\",\"PeriodicalId\":325917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38W93N\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38W93N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着合伙企业作为国际投资工具的使用越来越多,与国际合伙企业相关的美国税收问题也得到了相应的关注。然而,这些税收问题的解决可能难以捉摸。税收待遇往往不确定,因为被美国视为合伙企业的实体就像变色龙一样。尽管根据美国税法,合伙企业(与公司相反)的显著特征是其利润和亏损由其个别合伙人确认,但在分析更微妙的问题时,往往不清楚合伙企业是应被视为合伙人的单纯总和,还是应被视为一个独立的独立实体。不确定的税收待遇也出现在国际背景下的混合实体中,即一个国家将一个实体定性为合伙企业,而另一个国家将其定性为公司。自从美国国税局颁布法规,允许纳税人选择大多数国内非法人商业协会和许多外国商业协会是否应被视为公司或合伙企业(或在某些情况下作为分支机构),这些问题变得更加突出。3.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The U.S. International Tax Treatment of Partnerships: A Policy-Based Approach
As the use of partnerships as vehicles for international investment has increased, corresponding attention has been given to the U.S. tax issues associated with international partnerships.' The resolution of these tax issues, however, can be elusive. Tax treatment is often uncertain because entities that the U.S. treats as partnerships are chameleon-like. Although the distinguishing feature of a partnership (as opposed to a corporation) under U.S. tax law is that its profits and losses are recognized by its individual partners, in the analysis of subtler issues it is often unclear whether a partnership should be viewed as a mere aggregate of its partners or as a separate, stand-alone entity. Uncertain tax treatment also arises in the international context with respect to hybrid entities-the situation where one nation characterizes an entity as a partnership while another nation characterizes it as a corporation.' These issues have become more prominent since the IRS issued regulations that permit taxpayers to elect whether most domestic unincorporated business associations and many foreign business associations should be treated for federal tax purposes as corporations or partnerships (or in some cases as branches). 3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maritime Interdiction of North Korean Ships under UN Sanctions The South China Sea as a Challenge to International Law and to International Legal Scholarship Back in the Game: International Humanitarian Lawmaking by States International Law and Corporate Participation in Times of Armed Conflict Reversing the Two Wrong Turns in the Economic Analysis of International Law: A Club Goods Theory of Treaty Membership & European Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1