{"title":"评估用户界面:支持参与式过程中的决策过程","authors":"Lars Schütz, Korinna Bade","doi":"10.5220/0007719603980409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a novel intelligent user interface for assessing contributions submitted in participatory planning and decision processes. It assists public administrations in decision making by recommending ranked contributions that are similar to a reference contribution based on their textual content. This allows the user to group contributions in order to treat them consistently which is crucial in this domain. Presently, the assessment process is done manually with no sophisticated computer-aided support. The assessment user interface provides a two-column layout with a basic list of contributions in the left column and a list of similar contributions in the right column. We present results of a user study that we conducted with 21 public administration workers to evaluate the proposed interface. We found that the assessment user interface is well suited to the assessment task and the related decision-making process. But there are also unclear elements in the ranking visualization as well as some distrust in the ranked contributions or intelligent methods among the participants.","PeriodicalId":271024,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems","volume":"1994 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment User Interface: Supporting the Decision-making Process in Participatory Processes\",\"authors\":\"Lars Schütz, Korinna Bade\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0007719603980409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a novel intelligent user interface for assessing contributions submitted in participatory planning and decision processes. It assists public administrations in decision making by recommending ranked contributions that are similar to a reference contribution based on their textual content. This allows the user to group contributions in order to treat them consistently which is crucial in this domain. Presently, the assessment process is done manually with no sophisticated computer-aided support. The assessment user interface provides a two-column layout with a basic list of contributions in the left column and a list of similar contributions in the right column. We present results of a user study that we conducted with 21 public administration workers to evaluate the proposed interface. We found that the assessment user interface is well suited to the assessment task and the related decision-making process. But there are also unclear elements in the ranking visualization as well as some distrust in the ranked contributions or intelligent methods among the participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"1994 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0007719603980409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0007719603980409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment User Interface: Supporting the Decision-making Process in Participatory Processes
We introduce a novel intelligent user interface for assessing contributions submitted in participatory planning and decision processes. It assists public administrations in decision making by recommending ranked contributions that are similar to a reference contribution based on their textual content. This allows the user to group contributions in order to treat them consistently which is crucial in this domain. Presently, the assessment process is done manually with no sophisticated computer-aided support. The assessment user interface provides a two-column layout with a basic list of contributions in the left column and a list of similar contributions in the right column. We present results of a user study that we conducted with 21 public administration workers to evaluate the proposed interface. We found that the assessment user interface is well suited to the assessment task and the related decision-making process. But there are also unclear elements in the ranking visualization as well as some distrust in the ranked contributions or intelligent methods among the participants.