收藏家与收藏

R. Belk, Melanie Wallendorf, John F. Sherry
{"title":"收藏家与收藏","authors":"R. Belk, Melanie Wallendorf, John F. Sherry","doi":"10.1002/9781118827338.CH23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By one estimate, one out of every three Americans collects something (O'Brien 1981). Collecting is a common, intensely involving form of consumption. Yet it has been the subject of almost no prior work in the field of consumer research. This paper defines collecting and presents some initial findings from qualitative research on collectors. Propositions are derived for further investigation conceming the appeal and nature of collecting in contemporary American society. Acquiring, Possessing, Hoarding, and Collecting Distinctions are necessary between collecting and several related, but distinct consumption processes, including accumulation, possession, and hoarding. We reject, for example, the suggestion that collections are necessarily intentional (Duroust 1932) or must involve series-completion (Rigby and Rigby 1949), but accept these as characteristics of some important types of collections. Kron (1983) suggests that collectors are more selective (and classificatory) than indiscriminate accumulators. Belk (1982), Kron (1983) and Danet and Katriel (1986) all specify that collecting involves acquiring an interrelated set of possessions. Duroust (1932) specifies that objects (or ideas) in a collection must be valued for more than their utilitarian or even their aesthetic qualities. While items collected may have utilitarian or aesthetic appeals, they must have additional significance to the collector due to their importance in contributing to the \"set\" of items that comprise the collection. Although both coin collectors and misers accumulate money, the criterion of selectivity suggests that the miser is not a collector because he/she views money as a commodity (Simmel 1971/orig. 1907). We would further suggest that collected items take on a nonutilitarian \"sacred\" status, as discussed below. Items in a collection, as we construe it, may be material objects, ideas, or experiences (e.g., travel, restaurant, or concert experiences, either with or without tangible manifestations of these experiences). For the sake of brevity we will not focus on the possessionrelated activities of caring for, cataloging, or displaying a collection. These we label the curatorial aspects of collecting and differ from the acquisistive aspects of collecting per se. This distinguishes the collector from the possessor of a collection assembled by someone else (although the acquirer of several such previously assembled collections would be a collector of these collections). A similar distinction might be drawn between two types of non-collectors: the accumulator (who is acquisitive, but lacks selectivity) and the hoarder (who is possessive, but views the items possessed—e.g., food, toilet paper; McKinnon, Smith, and Hunt 1985primarily as utilitarian commodities rather than extrautilitarian sacred items). The acquisitive activities of both collectors and hoarders can become obsessive and compulsive (Jensen 1963). Indeed at least some degree of obsession is required to distinguish the hoarder and the collector from the mere possessor of items.","PeriodicalId":268180,"journal":{"name":"ACR North American Advances","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collectors and Collecting\",\"authors\":\"R. Belk, Melanie Wallendorf, John F. Sherry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9781118827338.CH23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By one estimate, one out of every three Americans collects something (O'Brien 1981). Collecting is a common, intensely involving form of consumption. Yet it has been the subject of almost no prior work in the field of consumer research. This paper defines collecting and presents some initial findings from qualitative research on collectors. Propositions are derived for further investigation conceming the appeal and nature of collecting in contemporary American society. Acquiring, Possessing, Hoarding, and Collecting Distinctions are necessary between collecting and several related, but distinct consumption processes, including accumulation, possession, and hoarding. We reject, for example, the suggestion that collections are necessarily intentional (Duroust 1932) or must involve series-completion (Rigby and Rigby 1949), but accept these as characteristics of some important types of collections. Kron (1983) suggests that collectors are more selective (and classificatory) than indiscriminate accumulators. Belk (1982), Kron (1983) and Danet and Katriel (1986) all specify that collecting involves acquiring an interrelated set of possessions. Duroust (1932) specifies that objects (or ideas) in a collection must be valued for more than their utilitarian or even their aesthetic qualities. While items collected may have utilitarian or aesthetic appeals, they must have additional significance to the collector due to their importance in contributing to the \\\"set\\\" of items that comprise the collection. Although both coin collectors and misers accumulate money, the criterion of selectivity suggests that the miser is not a collector because he/she views money as a commodity (Simmel 1971/orig. 1907). We would further suggest that collected items take on a nonutilitarian \\\"sacred\\\" status, as discussed below. Items in a collection, as we construe it, may be material objects, ideas, or experiences (e.g., travel, restaurant, or concert experiences, either with or without tangible manifestations of these experiences). For the sake of brevity we will not focus on the possessionrelated activities of caring for, cataloging, or displaying a collection. These we label the curatorial aspects of collecting and differ from the acquisistive aspects of collecting per se. This distinguishes the collector from the possessor of a collection assembled by someone else (although the acquirer of several such previously assembled collections would be a collector of these collections). A similar distinction might be drawn between two types of non-collectors: the accumulator (who is acquisitive, but lacks selectivity) and the hoarder (who is possessive, but views the items possessed—e.g., food, toilet paper; McKinnon, Smith, and Hunt 1985primarily as utilitarian commodities rather than extrautilitarian sacred items). The acquisitive activities of both collectors and hoarders can become obsessive and compulsive (Jensen 1963). Indeed at least some degree of obsession is required to distinguish the hoarder and the collector from the mere possessor of items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR North American Advances\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR North American Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118827338.CH23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR North American Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118827338.CH23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

据估计,每三个美国人中就有一个收集一些东西(O'Brien 1981)。收集是一种常见的、涉及广泛的消费形式。然而,在消费者研究领域,它几乎没有成为先前工作的主题。本文给出了收集的定义,并介绍了收集者定性研究的一些初步发现。关于当代美国社会收藏的吸引力和性质,提出了进一步研究的主张。获取、拥有、囤积和收集收集和其他几个相关但不同的消费过程,包括积累、占有和囤积,有必要加以区分。例如,我们拒绝收藏必然是有意的(Duroust 1932)或必须涉及系列完成(Rigby和Rigby 1949)的建议,但接受这些作为某些重要类型的收藏的特征。Kron(1983)认为收集者比不加区分的收集者更具选择性(和分类性)。Belk(1982)、Kron(1983)以及Danet和Katriel(1986)都明确指出,收藏包括获得一系列相互关联的财产。杜鲁斯特(Duroust, 1932)明确指出,收藏品中的物品(或思想)的价值必须超过它们的实用价值,甚至是它们的审美品质。虽然收集的物品可能具有实用或美学上的吸引力,但它们对收藏家来说必须具有额外的意义,因为它们在组成收藏品的“集合”中起着重要作用。尽管钱币收藏家和守财奴都在积累金钱,但选择性的标准表明守财奴不是一个收藏家,因为他/她把钱视为一种商品(Simmel 1971)。1907)。我们进一步建议,收集的物品具有非功利主义的“神圣”地位,如下所述。在我们的理解中,集合中的项目可以是实物、想法或经验(例如,旅行、餐馆或音乐会经验,有或没有这些经验的有形表现)。为简洁起见,我们将不关注与所有权相关的活动,如关心、编目或显示集合。我们将这些定义为收藏的策展方面,与收藏本身的收购方面有所不同。这将收藏家与他人组装的收藏品的所有者区分开来(尽管几个这样的先前组装的收藏品的购买者将是这些收藏品的收藏家)。两种类型的非收集者之间也存在类似的区别:积累者(具有占有欲,但缺乏选择性)和囤积者(具有占有欲,但只查看所拥有的物品)。、食品、卫生纸;McKinnon, Smith, and Hunt(1985)(主要是作为功利主义的商品而不是非功利主义的神圣物品)。收集者和囤积者的获取活动都可能成为强迫性和强迫性的(Jensen 1963)。的确,至少需要某种程度的痴迷才能将囤积者和收藏家与仅仅拥有物品的人区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collectors and Collecting
By one estimate, one out of every three Americans collects something (O'Brien 1981). Collecting is a common, intensely involving form of consumption. Yet it has been the subject of almost no prior work in the field of consumer research. This paper defines collecting and presents some initial findings from qualitative research on collectors. Propositions are derived for further investigation conceming the appeal and nature of collecting in contemporary American society. Acquiring, Possessing, Hoarding, and Collecting Distinctions are necessary between collecting and several related, but distinct consumption processes, including accumulation, possession, and hoarding. We reject, for example, the suggestion that collections are necessarily intentional (Duroust 1932) or must involve series-completion (Rigby and Rigby 1949), but accept these as characteristics of some important types of collections. Kron (1983) suggests that collectors are more selective (and classificatory) than indiscriminate accumulators. Belk (1982), Kron (1983) and Danet and Katriel (1986) all specify that collecting involves acquiring an interrelated set of possessions. Duroust (1932) specifies that objects (or ideas) in a collection must be valued for more than their utilitarian or even their aesthetic qualities. While items collected may have utilitarian or aesthetic appeals, they must have additional significance to the collector due to their importance in contributing to the "set" of items that comprise the collection. Although both coin collectors and misers accumulate money, the criterion of selectivity suggests that the miser is not a collector because he/she views money as a commodity (Simmel 1971/orig. 1907). We would further suggest that collected items take on a nonutilitarian "sacred" status, as discussed below. Items in a collection, as we construe it, may be material objects, ideas, or experiences (e.g., travel, restaurant, or concert experiences, either with or without tangible manifestations of these experiences). For the sake of brevity we will not focus on the possessionrelated activities of caring for, cataloging, or displaying a collection. These we label the curatorial aspects of collecting and differ from the acquisistive aspects of collecting per se. This distinguishes the collector from the possessor of a collection assembled by someone else (although the acquirer of several such previously assembled collections would be a collector of these collections). A similar distinction might be drawn between two types of non-collectors: the accumulator (who is acquisitive, but lacks selectivity) and the hoarder (who is possessive, but views the items possessed—e.g., food, toilet paper; McKinnon, Smith, and Hunt 1985primarily as utilitarian commodities rather than extrautilitarian sacred items). The acquisitive activities of both collectors and hoarders can become obsessive and compulsive (Jensen 1963). Indeed at least some degree of obsession is required to distinguish the hoarder and the collector from the mere possessor of items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial behavior among young adult consumers: the influence of self-determination and financial psychology Warm or Cold? The Effect of Color Temperature of Logo on Evaluation of For-Profits and Nonprofits When Sharing Isn’t Caring: The Influence of Seeking The Best on Sharing Favorable Word of Mouth about Unsatisfactory Purchases Birds of a Feather Feel Together: Emotional Ability Similarity in Consumer Interactions Goal Conflict Encourages Work and Discourages Leisure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1