预测联邦承包商的不当行为

Laura Alford, Stephen C. Hansen, Judith M. Hermis
{"title":"预测联邦承包商的不当行为","authors":"Laura Alford, Stephen C. Hansen, Judith M. Hermis","doi":"10.2308/jfar-2021-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Between 1995 and 2021, the United States’ Federal Government imposed $162.5 billion in penalties upon government contractors who had engaged in improper behavior as part of the procurement process. Despite the enormity of contractor misbehavior, the characteristics associated with contractor misconduct are relatively underexplored in academic literature. In this study, we examine whether and to what extent firm characteristics predict federal government contractor misbehaviors, which range from minor statutory violations to fraud. We document a consistent association between contractor characteristics (size and total amount of government contracts received), contract-specific characteristics (service-type contracts and awarding agencies GSA and DOE), and the act of committing misconduct. Misconduct severity increases in size and total amount of government contracts, is not affected by service contracts, and has an inverse U-shape for government agencies. Taken together, our results suggest that characteristics of the contractor, contract, and government agency are predictably associated with committing procurement misconduct.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\n JEL Classifications: H11; H57; M41.","PeriodicalId":149240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Federal Contractor Misconduct\",\"authors\":\"Laura Alford, Stephen C. Hansen, Judith M. Hermis\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jfar-2021-011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Between 1995 and 2021, the United States’ Federal Government imposed $162.5 billion in penalties upon government contractors who had engaged in improper behavior as part of the procurement process. Despite the enormity of contractor misbehavior, the characteristics associated with contractor misconduct are relatively underexplored in academic literature. In this study, we examine whether and to what extent firm characteristics predict federal government contractor misbehaviors, which range from minor statutory violations to fraud. We document a consistent association between contractor characteristics (size and total amount of government contracts received), contract-specific characteristics (service-type contracts and awarding agencies GSA and DOE), and the act of committing misconduct. Misconduct severity increases in size and total amount of government contracts, is not affected by service contracts, and has an inverse U-shape for government agencies. Taken together, our results suggest that characteristics of the contractor, contract, and government agency are predictably associated with committing procurement misconduct.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\\n JEL Classifications: H11; H57; M41.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2021-011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2021-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1995年至2021年,美国联邦政府对在采购过程中有不当行为的政府承包商处以1625亿美元的罚款。尽管承包商不当行为严重,但与承包商不当行为相关的特征在学术文献中相对较少。在这项研究中,我们考察了企业特征是否以及在多大程度上预测联邦政府承包商的不当行为,这些不当行为从轻微的违法行为到欺诈。我们记录了承包商特征(收到的政府合同的规模和总额)、合同特定特征(服务类型合同和授予机构GSA和DOE)与犯下不当行为之间的一致关联。不当行为严重程度随着政府合同的规模和总量的增加而增加,不受服务合同的影响,并且在政府机构中呈反u形。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,承包商、合同和政府机构的特征可预见地与采购不当行为有关。数据可用性:数据可从文本中引用的公共来源获得。JEL分类:H11;H57;M41。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Federal Contractor Misconduct
Between 1995 and 2021, the United States’ Federal Government imposed $162.5 billion in penalties upon government contractors who had engaged in improper behavior as part of the procurement process. Despite the enormity of contractor misbehavior, the characteristics associated with contractor misconduct are relatively underexplored in academic literature. In this study, we examine whether and to what extent firm characteristics predict federal government contractor misbehaviors, which range from minor statutory violations to fraud. We document a consistent association between contractor characteristics (size and total amount of government contracts received), contract-specific characteristics (service-type contracts and awarding agencies GSA and DOE), and the act of committing misconduct. Misconduct severity increases in size and total amount of government contracts, is not affected by service contracts, and has an inverse U-shape for government agencies. Taken together, our results suggest that characteristics of the contractor, contract, and government agency are predictably associated with committing procurement misconduct. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: H11; H57; M41.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Dark Triad on Organizational Fraud Manufacturing and Fraud: Evidence from Price Competition and Lean Inventories Remembering the Events of the COVID-19 Pandemic Editorial Policy Taxation and Forensic Accounting: Informing Research and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1