Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Lina Ochoa, Harold E. Castro, Lorena Salamanca, Mauricio Verano, R. Casallas, Santiago Gil, Carlos Valencia, Angee Zambrano, Mery Lang
{"title":"使用AWS Lambda和单片和微服务架构在云中运行Web应用程序的基础设施成本比较","authors":"Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Lina Ochoa, Harold E. Castro, Lorena Salamanca, Mauricio Verano, R. Casallas, Santiago Gil, Carlos Valencia, Angee Zambrano, Mery Lang","doi":"10.1109/CCGrid.2016.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated and upgraded independently. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, infrastructure costs are a major concern for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison to standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale microservices reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications.","PeriodicalId":103641,"journal":{"name":"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"159","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infrastructure Cost Comparison of Running Web Applications in the Cloud Using AWS Lambda and Monolithic and Microservice Architectures\",\"authors\":\"Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Lina Ochoa, Harold E. Castro, Lorena Salamanca, Mauricio Verano, R. Casallas, Santiago Gil, Carlos Valencia, Angee Zambrano, Mery Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCGrid.2016.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated and upgraded independently. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, infrastructure costs are a major concern for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison to standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale microservices reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"159\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2016.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 16th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2016.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Infrastructure Cost Comparison of Running Web Applications in the Cloud Using AWS Lambda and Monolithic and Microservice Architectures
Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated and upgraded independently. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, infrastructure costs are a major concern for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison to standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale microservices reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications.