纳米技术与公众参与:一种新的(社会)科学?

S. Davies, M. Kearnes, M. Macnaghten
{"title":"纳米技术与公众参与:一种新的(社会)科学?","authors":"S. Davies, M. Kearnes, M. Macnaghten","doi":"10.1201/9780429067150-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nanotechnology is often framed as revolutionary, both within science and in the effects it will have on our lives. Increasingly, the relationship between nanotechnology and society is cast as a hallmark of this distinctiveness. In current debates concerning its governance and regulation nanotechnology is cast as an opportunity to ‘get things right’ and ‘avoid the mistakes of the past’. Recent emphasis on the responsible development of nanotechnology, for example, demonstrates the increasing incorporation of both ethics and public participation initiatives into nanotechnology research programmes. In this chapter we examine this trend, reviewing current research on the relations between laypeople and nanotechnology. We reflect on both quantitative and qualitative literatures as well as the broader difficulties of engaging with an emergent technology such as nano, ending by suggesting issues, problematics and challenges that future social science on public engagement with nanotechnology should engage with. Not least of these is the question of how to research public concerns about a technology that is ‘in-the-making’.","PeriodicalId":287166,"journal":{"name":"Nano Meets Macro","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nanotechnology and Public Engagement: A New Kind of (Social) Science?\",\"authors\":\"S. Davies, M. Kearnes, M. Macnaghten\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9780429067150-32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nanotechnology is often framed as revolutionary, both within science and in the effects it will have on our lives. Increasingly, the relationship between nanotechnology and society is cast as a hallmark of this distinctiveness. In current debates concerning its governance and regulation nanotechnology is cast as an opportunity to ‘get things right’ and ‘avoid the mistakes of the past’. Recent emphasis on the responsible development of nanotechnology, for example, demonstrates the increasing incorporation of both ethics and public participation initiatives into nanotechnology research programmes. In this chapter we examine this trend, reviewing current research on the relations between laypeople and nanotechnology. We reflect on both quantitative and qualitative literatures as well as the broader difficulties of engaging with an emergent technology such as nano, ending by suggesting issues, problematics and challenges that future social science on public engagement with nanotechnology should engage with. Not least of these is the question of how to research public concerns about a technology that is ‘in-the-making’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nano Meets Macro\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nano Meets Macro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429067150-32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nano Meets Macro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429067150-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

无论是在科学领域还是在它对我们生活的影响方面,纳米技术常常被认为是革命性的。纳米技术与社会之间的关系越来越多地被视为这种独特性的标志。在目前关于其治理和监管的辩论中,纳米技术被视为一个“把事情做好”和“避免过去的错误”的机会。例如,最近对负责任地发展纳米技术的强调表明,越来越多地将伦理和公众参与倡议纳入纳米技术研究项目。在本章中,我们考察了这一趋势,回顾了目前关于外行人与纳米技术之间关系的研究。我们反映了定量和定性文献,以及参与新兴技术(如纳米)的更广泛的困难,最后提出了未来社会科学在公众参与纳米技术方面应该参与的问题、问题和挑战。其中最重要的问题是如何研究公众对一项“正在制造”的技术的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nanotechnology and Public Engagement: A New Kind of (Social) Science?
Nanotechnology is often framed as revolutionary, both within science and in the effects it will have on our lives. Increasingly, the relationship between nanotechnology and society is cast as a hallmark of this distinctiveness. In current debates concerning its governance and regulation nanotechnology is cast as an opportunity to ‘get things right’ and ‘avoid the mistakes of the past’. Recent emphasis on the responsible development of nanotechnology, for example, demonstrates the increasing incorporation of both ethics and public participation initiatives into nanotechnology research programmes. In this chapter we examine this trend, reviewing current research on the relations between laypeople and nanotechnology. We reflect on both quantitative and qualitative literatures as well as the broader difficulties of engaging with an emergent technology such as nano, ending by suggesting issues, problematics and challenges that future social science on public engagement with nanotechnology should engage with. Not least of these is the question of how to research public concerns about a technology that is ‘in-the-making’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Material Nature Inside, Outside: Nanobionics and Human Bodily Experience Periodic Table Triangular Masterpiece No. 5 Representations and Public Engagement: Nano in Norwegian Newspapers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1