{"title":"用尸体模型进行膝关节镜检查时关节内压力的变化","authors":"B. Salmelin, P. Gilbert","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to measure canine stifle intra-articular pressures (IAP) during arthroscopy using three different fluid pump pressure (FPP) settings. Study Design Frozen thawed canine cadavers were used. The stifle was distended using a 2.7 mm arthroscope connected to a commercial fluid pump. Intra-articular pressure was measured using a portable pressure gauge connected to an intra-articular 18 G needle. Intra-articular pressure was recorded during stifle extension, 90 degrees flexion and full flexion at three different FPP (30, 50, 80 mm Hg). Results Testing was performed on 27 stifles. Intra-articular pressure significantly increased at higher FPP ( p < 0.01). At FPP 30, 50, and 80 mm Hg, the mean IAP was 51.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3–62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8–113.7), and 175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8–185.6), respectively. At FPP 30 and 50 mm Hg, IAP always remained under 170 mm Hg. At 80 mm Hg, IAP raised to or above 170 mm Hg in 11/14 stifles. Stifle position significantly affected IAP ( p < 0.01). Changing stifle position from 90 degrees flexion to extension significantly decreased IAP by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2–28.5), and changing to full flexion significantly increased IAP by 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8–27.1; p < 0.01). Conclusion Our results suggest that caution should be used during stifle arthroscopy to limit risk for iatrogenic capsular damage. Fluid pump pressure 30 mm Hg is considered safe when using a 2.7 mm arthroscope and high flow cannula. If higher FPP is necessary for visualization, duration of stifle flexion should be limited. Fluid pump pressure 80 mm Hg should be avoided.","PeriodicalId":443672,"journal":{"name":"VCOT Open","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-articular Pressure Changes during Stifle Arthroscopy Using a Cadaver Model\",\"authors\":\"B. Salmelin, P. Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to measure canine stifle intra-articular pressures (IAP) during arthroscopy using three different fluid pump pressure (FPP) settings. Study Design Frozen thawed canine cadavers were used. The stifle was distended using a 2.7 mm arthroscope connected to a commercial fluid pump. Intra-articular pressure was measured using a portable pressure gauge connected to an intra-articular 18 G needle. Intra-articular pressure was recorded during stifle extension, 90 degrees flexion and full flexion at three different FPP (30, 50, 80 mm Hg). Results Testing was performed on 27 stifles. Intra-articular pressure significantly increased at higher FPP ( p < 0.01). At FPP 30, 50, and 80 mm Hg, the mean IAP was 51.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3–62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8–113.7), and 175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8–185.6), respectively. At FPP 30 and 50 mm Hg, IAP always remained under 170 mm Hg. At 80 mm Hg, IAP raised to or above 170 mm Hg in 11/14 stifles. Stifle position significantly affected IAP ( p < 0.01). Changing stifle position from 90 degrees flexion to extension significantly decreased IAP by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2–28.5), and changing to full flexion significantly increased IAP by 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8–27.1; p < 0.01). Conclusion Our results suggest that caution should be used during stifle arthroscopy to limit risk for iatrogenic capsular damage. Fluid pump pressure 30 mm Hg is considered safe when using a 2.7 mm arthroscope and high flow cannula. If higher FPP is necessary for visualization, duration of stifle flexion should be limited. Fluid pump pressure 80 mm Hg should be avoided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VCOT Open\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VCOT Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VCOT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要目的通过三种不同的流体泵压力(FPP)设置来测量关节镜下犬膝关节内压力(IAP)。研究设计使用冷冻解冻的犬尸体。使用连接商用流体泵的2.7 mm关节镜对膝关节进行扩张。使用连接关节内18g针的便携式压力表测量关节内压力。在三种不同的FPP(30、50、80 mm Hg)下,记录膝关节伸展、90度屈曲和完全屈曲时的关节内压力。结果对27头猪进行了检测。高FPP时关节内压力显著升高(p < 0.01)。在FPP 30,50和80 mm Hg时,平均IAP分别为51.8(95%可信区间[CI]: 41.3-62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8-113.7)和175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8-185.6)。当FPP为30和50 mm Hg时,IAP始终保持在170 mm Hg以下。当FPP为80 mm Hg时,IAP在11/14组中上升至或高于170 mm Hg。窒息体位对IAP有显著影响(p < 0.01)。将膝关节位置从90度屈折变为伸直可显著降低IAP 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2-28.5),而完全屈折可显著增加IAP 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8-27.1;P < 0.01)。结论我们的研究结果表明,在膝关节镜检查时应谨慎,以限制医源性关节囊损伤的风险。当使用2.7 mm关节镜和高流量套管时,流体泵压力30 mm Hg被认为是安全的。如果需要更高的FPP,则应限制膝关节屈曲的持续时间。流体泵压力应避免80mmhg。
Intra-articular Pressure Changes during Stifle Arthroscopy Using a Cadaver Model
Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to measure canine stifle intra-articular pressures (IAP) during arthroscopy using three different fluid pump pressure (FPP) settings. Study Design Frozen thawed canine cadavers were used. The stifle was distended using a 2.7 mm arthroscope connected to a commercial fluid pump. Intra-articular pressure was measured using a portable pressure gauge connected to an intra-articular 18 G needle. Intra-articular pressure was recorded during stifle extension, 90 degrees flexion and full flexion at three different FPP (30, 50, 80 mm Hg). Results Testing was performed on 27 stifles. Intra-articular pressure significantly increased at higher FPP ( p < 0.01). At FPP 30, 50, and 80 mm Hg, the mean IAP was 51.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3–62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8–113.7), and 175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8–185.6), respectively. At FPP 30 and 50 mm Hg, IAP always remained under 170 mm Hg. At 80 mm Hg, IAP raised to or above 170 mm Hg in 11/14 stifles. Stifle position significantly affected IAP ( p < 0.01). Changing stifle position from 90 degrees flexion to extension significantly decreased IAP by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2–28.5), and changing to full flexion significantly increased IAP by 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8–27.1; p < 0.01). Conclusion Our results suggest that caution should be used during stifle arthroscopy to limit risk for iatrogenic capsular damage. Fluid pump pressure 30 mm Hg is considered safe when using a 2.7 mm arthroscope and high flow cannula. If higher FPP is necessary for visualization, duration of stifle flexion should be limited. Fluid pump pressure 80 mm Hg should be avoided.