用尸体模型进行膝关节镜检查时关节内压力的变化

VCOT Open Pub Date : 2022-10-25 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771400
B. Salmelin, P. Gilbert
{"title":"用尸体模型进行膝关节镜检查时关节内压力的变化","authors":"B. Salmelin, P. Gilbert","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  The aim of the study was to measure canine stifle intra-articular pressures (IAP) during arthroscopy using three different fluid pump pressure (FPP) settings. Study Design  Frozen thawed canine cadavers were used. The stifle was distended using a 2.7 mm arthroscope connected to a commercial fluid pump. Intra-articular pressure was measured using a portable pressure gauge connected to an intra-articular 18 G needle. Intra-articular pressure was recorded during stifle extension, 90 degrees flexion and full flexion at three different FPP (30, 50, 80 mm Hg). Results  Testing was performed on 27 stifles. Intra-articular pressure significantly increased at higher FPP ( p  < 0.01). At FPP 30, 50, and 80 mm Hg, the mean IAP was 51.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3–62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8–113.7), and 175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8–185.6), respectively. At FPP 30 and 50 mm Hg, IAP always remained under 170 mm Hg. At 80 mm Hg, IAP raised to or above 170 mm Hg in 11/14 stifles. Stifle position significantly affected IAP ( p  < 0.01). Changing stifle position from 90 degrees flexion to extension significantly decreased IAP by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2–28.5), and changing to full flexion significantly increased IAP by 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8–27.1; p  < 0.01). Conclusion  Our results suggest that caution should be used during stifle arthroscopy to limit risk for iatrogenic capsular damage. Fluid pump pressure 30 mm Hg is considered safe when using a 2.7 mm arthroscope and high flow cannula. If higher FPP is necessary for visualization, duration of stifle flexion should be limited. Fluid pump pressure 80 mm Hg should be avoided.","PeriodicalId":443672,"journal":{"name":"VCOT Open","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-articular Pressure Changes during Stifle Arthroscopy Using a Cadaver Model\",\"authors\":\"B. Salmelin, P. Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective  The aim of the study was to measure canine stifle intra-articular pressures (IAP) during arthroscopy using three different fluid pump pressure (FPP) settings. Study Design  Frozen thawed canine cadavers were used. The stifle was distended using a 2.7 mm arthroscope connected to a commercial fluid pump. Intra-articular pressure was measured using a portable pressure gauge connected to an intra-articular 18 G needle. Intra-articular pressure was recorded during stifle extension, 90 degrees flexion and full flexion at three different FPP (30, 50, 80 mm Hg). Results  Testing was performed on 27 stifles. Intra-articular pressure significantly increased at higher FPP ( p  < 0.01). At FPP 30, 50, and 80 mm Hg, the mean IAP was 51.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3–62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8–113.7), and 175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8–185.6), respectively. At FPP 30 and 50 mm Hg, IAP always remained under 170 mm Hg. At 80 mm Hg, IAP raised to or above 170 mm Hg in 11/14 stifles. Stifle position significantly affected IAP ( p  < 0.01). Changing stifle position from 90 degrees flexion to extension significantly decreased IAP by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2–28.5), and changing to full flexion significantly increased IAP by 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8–27.1; p  < 0.01). Conclusion  Our results suggest that caution should be used during stifle arthroscopy to limit risk for iatrogenic capsular damage. Fluid pump pressure 30 mm Hg is considered safe when using a 2.7 mm arthroscope and high flow cannula. If higher FPP is necessary for visualization, duration of stifle flexion should be limited. Fluid pump pressure 80 mm Hg should be avoided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VCOT Open\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VCOT Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VCOT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的通过三种不同的流体泵压力(FPP)设置来测量关节镜下犬膝关节内压力(IAP)。研究设计使用冷冻解冻的犬尸体。使用连接商用流体泵的2.7 mm关节镜对膝关节进行扩张。使用连接关节内18g针的便携式压力表测量关节内压力。在三种不同的FPP(30、50、80 mm Hg)下,记录膝关节伸展、90度屈曲和完全屈曲时的关节内压力。结果对27头猪进行了检测。高FPP时关节内压力显著升高(p < 0.01)。在FPP 30,50和80 mm Hg时,平均IAP分别为51.8(95%可信区间[CI]: 41.3-62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8-113.7)和175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8-185.6)。当FPP为30和50 mm Hg时,IAP始终保持在170 mm Hg以下。当FPP为80 mm Hg时,IAP在11/14组中上升至或高于170 mm Hg。窒息体位对IAP有显著影响(p < 0.01)。将膝关节位置从90度屈折变为伸直可显著降低IAP 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2-28.5),而完全屈折可显著增加IAP 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8-27.1;P < 0.01)。结论我们的研究结果表明,在膝关节镜检查时应谨慎,以限制医源性关节囊损伤的风险。当使用2.7 mm关节镜和高流量套管时,流体泵压力30 mm Hg被认为是安全的。如果需要更高的FPP,则应限制膝关节屈曲的持续时间。流体泵压力应避免80mmhg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intra-articular Pressure Changes during Stifle Arthroscopy Using a Cadaver Model
Abstract Objective  The aim of the study was to measure canine stifle intra-articular pressures (IAP) during arthroscopy using three different fluid pump pressure (FPP) settings. Study Design  Frozen thawed canine cadavers were used. The stifle was distended using a 2.7 mm arthroscope connected to a commercial fluid pump. Intra-articular pressure was measured using a portable pressure gauge connected to an intra-articular 18 G needle. Intra-articular pressure was recorded during stifle extension, 90 degrees flexion and full flexion at three different FPP (30, 50, 80 mm Hg). Results  Testing was performed on 27 stifles. Intra-articular pressure significantly increased at higher FPP ( p  < 0.01). At FPP 30, 50, and 80 mm Hg, the mean IAP was 51.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3–62.2), 103.3 (95% CI: 92.8–113.7), and 175.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 164.8–185.6), respectively. At FPP 30 and 50 mm Hg, IAP always remained under 170 mm Hg. At 80 mm Hg, IAP raised to or above 170 mm Hg in 11/14 stifles. Stifle position significantly affected IAP ( p  < 0.01). Changing stifle position from 90 degrees flexion to extension significantly decreased IAP by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.2–28.5), and changing to full flexion significantly increased IAP by 20.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 14.8–27.1; p  < 0.01). Conclusion  Our results suggest that caution should be used during stifle arthroscopy to limit risk for iatrogenic capsular damage. Fluid pump pressure 30 mm Hg is considered safe when using a 2.7 mm arthroscope and high flow cannula. If higher FPP is necessary for visualization, duration of stifle flexion should be limited. Fluid pump pressure 80 mm Hg should be avoided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Vitro Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Different Skin Staples Surgical Approaches for Minimally Invasive Interlocking Nail Osteosynthesis in Dogs Intraoperative Distraction Device for Open Reduction of Nascent Lateral Humeral Condylar Fractures in Five Dogs Correction of Angular Limb Deformities in Two Dogs Using a Conformation-Based Surgical Approach and Planning Software Corrective Osteotomy in a Dog to Address Increased Distal Femoral Procurvatum Ascribed to a Distal Femoral Salter-Harris Type V Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1