阿拉伯网站的存档情况如何?

Lulwah M. Alkwai, Michael L. Nelson, Michele C. Weigle
{"title":"阿拉伯网站的存档情况如何?","authors":"Lulwah M. Alkwai, Michael L. Nelson, Michele C. Weigle","doi":"10.1145/2756406.2756912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is has long been anecdotally known that web archives and search engines favor Western and English-language sites. In this paper we quantitatively explore how well indexed and archived are Arabic language web sites. We began by sampling 15,092 unique URIs from three different website directories: DMOZ (multi-lingual), Raddadi and Star28 (both primarily Arabic language). Using language identification tools we eliminated pages not in the Arabic language (e.g., English language versions of Al-Jazeera sites) and culled the collection to 7,976 definitely Arabic language web pages. We then used these 7,976 pages and crawled the live web and web archives to produce a collection of 300,646 Arabic language pages. We discovered: 1) 46% are not archived and 31% are not indexed by Google (www.google.com), 2) only 14.84% of the URIs had an Arabic country code top-level domain (e.g., .sa) and only 10.53% had a GeoIP in an Arabic country, 3) having either only an Arabic GeoIP or only an Arabic top-level domain appears to negatively impact archiving, 4) most of the archived pages are near the top level of the site and deeper links into the site are not well-archived, 5) the presence in a directory positively impacts indexing and presence in the DMOZ directory, specifically, positively impacts archiving.","PeriodicalId":256118,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Well Are Arabic Websites Archived?\",\"authors\":\"Lulwah M. Alkwai, Michael L. Nelson, Michele C. Weigle\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2756406.2756912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is has long been anecdotally known that web archives and search engines favor Western and English-language sites. In this paper we quantitatively explore how well indexed and archived are Arabic language web sites. We began by sampling 15,092 unique URIs from three different website directories: DMOZ (multi-lingual), Raddadi and Star28 (both primarily Arabic language). Using language identification tools we eliminated pages not in the Arabic language (e.g., English language versions of Al-Jazeera sites) and culled the collection to 7,976 definitely Arabic language web pages. We then used these 7,976 pages and crawled the live web and web archives to produce a collection of 300,646 Arabic language pages. We discovered: 1) 46% are not archived and 31% are not indexed by Google (www.google.com), 2) only 14.84% of the URIs had an Arabic country code top-level domain (e.g., .sa) and only 10.53% had a GeoIP in an Arabic country, 3) having either only an Arabic GeoIP or only an Arabic top-level domain appears to negatively impact archiving, 4) most of the archived pages are near the top level of the site and deeper links into the site are not well-archived, 5) the presence in a directory positively impacts indexing and presence in the DMOZ directory, specifically, positively impacts archiving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

人们早就知道,网络档案和搜索引擎偏爱西方和英语网站。在本文中,我们定量地探讨如何很好地索引和存档是阿拉伯语网站。我们首先从三个不同的网站目录中抽样15092个唯一的uri: DMOZ(多语言)、Raddadi和Star28(主要都是阿拉伯语)。使用语言识别工具,我们删除了非阿拉伯语的网页(例如,半岛电视台网站的英语版本),并剔除了7976个绝对是阿拉伯语的网页。然后,我们使用这7,976个页面,并抓取实时网络和网络档案,生成一个包含300,646个阿拉伯语页面的集合。我们发现:1) 46%没有被归档和31%不是由谷歌索引(www.google.com), 2)只有14.84%的uri有阿拉伯国家代码顶级域名(如.sa),仅10.53%的机构有GeoIP在一个阿拉伯国家,3)有只有一个阿拉伯语GeoIP或只有一个阿拉伯语顶级域名似乎产生负面影响存档,4)附近的存档页面最顶级的站点和深层链接到站点不是well-archived,5)在目录中的存在对索引和DMOZ目录中的存在有积极的影响,特别是对归档有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Well Are Arabic Websites Archived?
It is has long been anecdotally known that web archives and search engines favor Western and English-language sites. In this paper we quantitatively explore how well indexed and archived are Arabic language web sites. We began by sampling 15,092 unique URIs from three different website directories: DMOZ (multi-lingual), Raddadi and Star28 (both primarily Arabic language). Using language identification tools we eliminated pages not in the Arabic language (e.g., English language versions of Al-Jazeera sites) and culled the collection to 7,976 definitely Arabic language web pages. We then used these 7,976 pages and crawled the live web and web archives to produce a collection of 300,646 Arabic language pages. We discovered: 1) 46% are not archived and 31% are not indexed by Google (www.google.com), 2) only 14.84% of the URIs had an Arabic country code top-level domain (e.g., .sa) and only 10.53% had a GeoIP in an Arabic country, 3) having either only an Arabic GeoIP or only an Arabic top-level domain appears to negatively impact archiving, 4) most of the archived pages are near the top level of the site and deeper links into the site are not well-archived, 5) the presence in a directory positively impacts indexing and presence in the DMOZ directory, specifically, positively impacts archiving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining Classifiers and User Feedback for Disambiguating Author Names Improving Access to Large-scale Digital Libraries ThroughSemantic-enhanced Search and Disambiguation ConfAssist: A Conflict Resolution Framework for Assisting the Categorization of Computer Science Conferences The HathiTrust Research Center: Providing analytic access to the HathiTrust Digital Library's 4.7 billion pages Scholarly Document Information Extraction using Extensible Features for Efficient Higher Order Semi-CRFs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1