在部落和有限权力的阴影下讨价还价

J. Wade
{"title":"在部落和有限权力的阴影下讨价还价","authors":"J. Wade","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2408862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the predictable hurdles faced by negotiators, mediators and litigators is when one of the negotiators states, or raises suspicions, that (s)he does not have authority to contract or settle. Rather they must first consult with influential outsiders or constituents.The types of outsiders are described, and a routine process is suggested to identify important constituents or \"tribes\"; then to normalize, reframe and turn this barrier into a standard problem solving question such as \" How to manage the influential outsider?\"Thirteen possible responses used by negotiators to such a question ( each with inevitable advantages and disadvantages) are systematised for mediators, negotiators and litigators to learn and thereby \"add value\" to any negotiation.","PeriodicalId":165934,"journal":{"name":"The Bond Law Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bargaining in the Shadow of the Tribe and Limited Authority to Settle\",\"authors\":\"J. Wade\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2408862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the predictable hurdles faced by negotiators, mediators and litigators is when one of the negotiators states, or raises suspicions, that (s)he does not have authority to contract or settle. Rather they must first consult with influential outsiders or constituents.The types of outsiders are described, and a routine process is suggested to identify important constituents or \\\"tribes\\\"; then to normalize, reframe and turn this barrier into a standard problem solving question such as \\\" How to manage the influential outsider?\\\"Thirteen possible responses used by negotiators to such a question ( each with inevitable advantages and disadvantages) are systematised for mediators, negotiators and litigators to learn and thereby \\\"add value\\\" to any negotiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bond Law Review\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bond Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2408862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bond Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2408862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

谈判人员、调解员和诉讼律师面临的一个可预见的障碍是,当谈判人员之一声明或提出怀疑时,他(或她)无权签订合同或和解。相反,他们必须首先咨询有影响力的外部人士或选民。描述了外来者的类型,并建议采用常规程序来识别重要的组成部分或“部落”;然后将这一障碍正常化、重构并变成一个标准的解决问题的问题,比如“如何管理有影响力的局外人?”谈判者对这一问题所使用的13种可能的回答(每种都有不可避免的优点和缺点)被系统化,供调解人、谈判者和诉讼律师学习,从而为任何谈判“增加价值”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bargaining in the Shadow of the Tribe and Limited Authority to Settle
One of the predictable hurdles faced by negotiators, mediators and litigators is when one of the negotiators states, or raises suspicions, that (s)he does not have authority to contract or settle. Rather they must first consult with influential outsiders or constituents.The types of outsiders are described, and a routine process is suggested to identify important constituents or "tribes"; then to normalize, reframe and turn this barrier into a standard problem solving question such as " How to manage the influential outsider?"Thirteen possible responses used by negotiators to such a question ( each with inevitable advantages and disadvantages) are systematised for mediators, negotiators and litigators to learn and thereby "add value" to any negotiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principle and Policy in Malicious Prosecution Stigma, Stigmata: Reforming the Sex Discrimination Act to Account for Menstruation as a Protected Characteristic A Conspiracy of Paper? William Paterson and the Mysterious Origins of Banking and Company Law Unpacking Post-Employment Restraint of Trade Decisions: The Motivators of the Key Players The ghost of rankings past - The lasting harmful impact of journal rankings, and what we should do instead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1