弹性传输协议的设计与分析

T. A. Nguyen, J. Sterbenz
{"title":"弹性传输协议的设计与分析","authors":"T. A. Nguyen, J. Sterbenz","doi":"10.1109/RNDM.2018.8489800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the design and simulation analysis of ResTP, a multipath-capable configurable and adaptive transport-layer protocol developed for Future Internet resilience and survivability. ResTP is distinct from the conventional transport protocols such as TCP, UDP, and MPTCP by the flexibility in its design so that it can satisfy the requirements of various traffic classes, application types, and taking into account the underlying network characteristics, and its emphasis on achieving resilience, an essential property that is unfortunately lacking in the current Internet system. In this paper, we perform a simulation evaluation of ResTP, with the focus on its single-path mode, in comparison with TCP and UDP under various network conditions to show that ResTP can be used in place of these standard protocols with no performance loss. In some scenarios, ResTP outperforms the standards due to its flexibility in adopting the appropriate set of algorithms for specific application needs and network conditions.","PeriodicalId":340686,"journal":{"name":"2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Design and Analysis of a Resilient Transport Protocol\",\"authors\":\"T. A. Nguyen, J. Sterbenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RNDM.2018.8489800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present the design and simulation analysis of ResTP, a multipath-capable configurable and adaptive transport-layer protocol developed for Future Internet resilience and survivability. ResTP is distinct from the conventional transport protocols such as TCP, UDP, and MPTCP by the flexibility in its design so that it can satisfy the requirements of various traffic classes, application types, and taking into account the underlying network characteristics, and its emphasis on achieving resilience, an essential property that is unfortunately lacking in the current Internet system. In this paper, we perform a simulation evaluation of ResTP, with the focus on its single-path mode, in comparison with TCP and UDP under various network conditions to show that ResTP can be used in place of these standard protocols with no performance loss. In some scenarios, ResTP outperforms the standards due to its flexibility in adopting the appropriate set of algorithms for specific application needs and network conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RNDM.2018.8489800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RNDM.2018.8489800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了ResTP的设计和仿真分析,ResTP是一种多路径可配置和自适应的传输层协议,为未来互联网的弹性和生存性而开发。ResTP与传统的传输协议(如TCP、UDP和MPTCP)的不同之处在于其设计的灵活性,因此它可以满足各种流量类、应用程序类型的需求,并考虑到潜在的网络特征,并且强调实现弹性,这是当前Internet系统中不幸缺乏的基本属性。在本文中,我们对ResTP进行了仿真评估,重点关注其单路径模式,并在各种网络条件下与TCP和UDP进行了比较,以表明ResTP可以代替这些标准协议而不会造成性能损失。在某些情况下,ResTP优于标准,因为它可以灵活地为特定的应用程序需求和网络条件采用适当的算法集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Design and Analysis of a Resilient Transport Protocol
We present the design and simulation analysis of ResTP, a multipath-capable configurable and adaptive transport-layer protocol developed for Future Internet resilience and survivability. ResTP is distinct from the conventional transport protocols such as TCP, UDP, and MPTCP by the flexibility in its design so that it can satisfy the requirements of various traffic classes, application types, and taking into account the underlying network characteristics, and its emphasis on achieving resilience, an essential property that is unfortunately lacking in the current Internet system. In this paper, we perform a simulation evaluation of ResTP, with the focus on its single-path mode, in comparison with TCP and UDP under various network conditions to show that ResTP can be used in place of these standard protocols with no performance loss. In some scenarios, ResTP outperforms the standards due to its flexibility in adopting the appropriate set of algorithms for specific application needs and network conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Another Price to Pay: An Availability Analysis for SDN Virtualization with Network Hypervisors Vulnerable Regions of Networks on Sphere SRLG-disjointness and geodiverse routing – a practical network study and operational conclusions [Copyright notice] Monte Carlo Tree Search for Cross-Stratum Optimization of Survivable Inter-Data Center Elastic Optical Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1