{"title":"巴西资本市场的仲裁条款数量","authors":"Mariana Pargendler, Viviane Muller Prado, Ezequiel Fajreldines Santos, Dalila Martins Viol","doi":"10.54648/rba2022028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This empirical study updates and extends research published in 2014 on the use of arbitration clauses by publicly traded companies in Brazil to elucidate the current state and recent developments in the field of arbitration in Brazilian capital markets. In 2021, 234 publicly traded companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, amounting to 61% of companies listed on B3. Even in the Traditional and Level 1 segments, where arbitration is not mandatory, 27% of the companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, compared to only 15% in 2013. In addition, among the 41% listed companies with shareholder agreements, 77% opt for arbitration, compared to 70% in 2013. Although a significant proportion of companies have not yet adopted arbitration clauses, we observe a small increase in the adoption of arbitration by publicly traded companies between 2013 and 2021. In the last quarter of 2021, 18% of the companies comprising the Ibovespa index had no arbitration clause in their corporate charter. When arbitration not mandatory, the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado was selected by 76% of companies listed on Traditional and Level 1 segments, as well as by 61% of the total number of companies that have an arbitration clause in their shareholder agreements.\nEmpirical study; capital market; publicly traded companies; arbitration clause; arbitration; corporate charter; shareholder agreement.","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cláusulas arbitrais em números no mercado de capitais brasileiro\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Pargendler, Viviane Muller Prado, Ezequiel Fajreldines Santos, Dalila Martins Viol\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/rba2022028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This empirical study updates and extends research published in 2014 on the use of arbitration clauses by publicly traded companies in Brazil to elucidate the current state and recent developments in the field of arbitration in Brazilian capital markets. In 2021, 234 publicly traded companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, amounting to 61% of companies listed on B3. Even in the Traditional and Level 1 segments, where arbitration is not mandatory, 27% of the companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, compared to only 15% in 2013. In addition, among the 41% listed companies with shareholder agreements, 77% opt for arbitration, compared to 70% in 2013. Although a significant proportion of companies have not yet adopted arbitration clauses, we observe a small increase in the adoption of arbitration by publicly traded companies between 2013 and 2021. In the last quarter of 2021, 18% of the companies comprising the Ibovespa index had no arbitration clause in their corporate charter. When arbitration not mandatory, the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado was selected by 76% of companies listed on Traditional and Level 1 segments, as well as by 61% of the total number of companies that have an arbitration clause in their shareholder agreements.\\nEmpirical study; capital market; publicly traded companies; arbitration clause; arbitration; corporate charter; shareholder agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本实证研究更新并扩展了2014年发表的关于巴西上市公司使用仲裁条款的研究,以阐明巴西资本市场仲裁领域的现状和最新发展。2021年,共有234家上市公司在公司章程中加入仲裁条款,占B3类上市公司的61%。即使是在传统和一级市场,仲裁不是强制性的,27%的公司在其公司章程中有仲裁条款,而2013年只有15%。此外,在41%有股东协议的上市公司中,77%的公司选择仲裁,而2013年这一比例为70%。尽管很大一部分公司尚未采用仲裁条款,但我们观察到,2013年至2021年期间,上市公司采用仲裁的情况略有增加。在2021年最后一个季度,Ibovespa指数中18%的公司在其公司章程中没有仲裁条款。在非强制性仲裁的情况下,76%的传统和一级市场上市公司以及61%的股东协议中有仲裁条款的公司选择了市场仲裁委员会(cmara de Arbitragem do Mercado)。实证研究;资本市场;上市公司;仲裁条款;仲裁;公司章程;股东协议。
Cláusulas arbitrais em números no mercado de capitais brasileiro
This empirical study updates and extends research published in 2014 on the use of arbitration clauses by publicly traded companies in Brazil to elucidate the current state and recent developments in the field of arbitration in Brazilian capital markets. In 2021, 234 publicly traded companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, amounting to 61% of companies listed on B3. Even in the Traditional and Level 1 segments, where arbitration is not mandatory, 27% of the companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, compared to only 15% in 2013. In addition, among the 41% listed companies with shareholder agreements, 77% opt for arbitration, compared to 70% in 2013. Although a significant proportion of companies have not yet adopted arbitration clauses, we observe a small increase in the adoption of arbitration by publicly traded companies between 2013 and 2021. In the last quarter of 2021, 18% of the companies comprising the Ibovespa index had no arbitration clause in their corporate charter. When arbitration not mandatory, the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado was selected by 76% of companies listed on Traditional and Level 1 segments, as well as by 61% of the total number of companies that have an arbitration clause in their shareholder agreements.
Empirical study; capital market; publicly traded companies; arbitration clause; arbitration; corporate charter; shareholder agreement.