项目管理:精益与敏捷方法论

Maria Georgakalou, Kostas Koutsikos
{"title":"项目管理:精益与敏捷方法论","authors":"Maria Georgakalou, Kostas Koutsikos","doi":"10.12681/icbe-hou.5312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past decades there has been a large discussion on the suitability of the lean and the agile methodologies for an effective project management. This paper aims at providing an answer to this question. Both theoretical facts and practical case studies are going to be examined in order to be able to reach a result. It seems that both methodologies might be good, depending on the problem under consideration. The two methodologies have some differences both on their starting point (LEAN was initially used in the manufacturing sector, while AGILE was initially used by the software development sector) and on their general concept (LEAN being more holistic and long-term, while AGILE is a better tool when quick decisions are needed). Aspects such as reliability of the methodologies and their challenges including reasons that might lead to failure are going to be discussed.   EL Classifications: M10 General, M11 Production Management, M19 Other Keywords: LEAN methodology, AGILE methodology, Project management, effectiveness, efficiency","PeriodicalId":374676,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Business and Economics - Hellenic Open University","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Project management: Lean vs. Agile methodology\",\"authors\":\"Maria Georgakalou, Kostas Koutsikos\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/icbe-hou.5312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The past decades there has been a large discussion on the suitability of the lean and the agile methodologies for an effective project management. This paper aims at providing an answer to this question. Both theoretical facts and practical case studies are going to be examined in order to be able to reach a result. It seems that both methodologies might be good, depending on the problem under consideration. The two methodologies have some differences both on their starting point (LEAN was initially used in the manufacturing sector, while AGILE was initially used by the software development sector) and on their general concept (LEAN being more holistic and long-term, while AGILE is a better tool when quick decisions are needed). Aspects such as reliability of the methodologies and their challenges including reasons that might lead to failure are going to be discussed.   EL Classifications: M10 General, M11 Production Management, M19 Other Keywords: LEAN methodology, AGILE methodology, Project management, effectiveness, efficiency\",\"PeriodicalId\":374676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Business and Economics - Hellenic Open University\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Business and Economics - Hellenic Open University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/icbe-hou.5312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Business and Economics - Hellenic Open University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/icbe-hou.5312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,关于精益和敏捷方法对有效项目管理的适用性进行了大量的讨论。本文旨在为这个问题提供一个答案。理论事实和实际案例研究都将被检查,以便能够达到一个结果。这两种方法似乎都是好的,这取决于所考虑的问题。这两种方法在起点(LEAN最初用于制造业,而AGILE最初用于软件开发部门)和一般概念(LEAN更全面和长期,而AGILE是需要快速决策时更好的工具)上都有一些差异。将讨论诸如方法的可靠性及其挑战(包括可能导致失败的原因)等方面。EL分类:M10通用,M11生产管理,M19其他关键词:精益方法论,敏捷方法论,项目管理,有效性,效率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Project management: Lean vs. Agile methodology
The past decades there has been a large discussion on the suitability of the lean and the agile methodologies for an effective project management. This paper aims at providing an answer to this question. Both theoretical facts and practical case studies are going to be examined in order to be able to reach a result. It seems that both methodologies might be good, depending on the problem under consideration. The two methodologies have some differences both on their starting point (LEAN was initially used in the manufacturing sector, while AGILE was initially used by the software development sector) and on their general concept (LEAN being more holistic and long-term, while AGILE is a better tool when quick decisions are needed). Aspects such as reliability of the methodologies and their challenges including reasons that might lead to failure are going to be discussed.   EL Classifications: M10 General, M11 Production Management, M19 Other Keywords: LEAN methodology, AGILE methodology, Project management, effectiveness, efficiency
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview of tax measures for personal income tax of the period 2009-2020 Price Analysis in the European Food Supply Chain Preface Proceedings ICBE-HOU 2022 The Macroeconomic and Social imbalances in the Eurozone in the period of Economic Crisis (2008 - 2014) Public management reform under the dome of accruals (Presidential Decree 54/2018): Investigation of the effects on the financial information and the audit of the General Government entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1