Kadir Arslan, A. Şahin
{"title":"COVID-19 Pandemisi Öncesi ve Döneminde Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Takip Edilen Hastaların Kan Kültürü İzolatlarının Tür Dağılımı ve Antibiyotik Duyarlılıklarının Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkez Analizi","authors":"Kadir Arslan, A. Şahin","doi":"10.38175/phnx.1222179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aims to identify the microorganism species isolated from blood cultures of patients hospitalized in the ICU of a tertiary center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and to investigate their antibiotic susceptibility. \nMaterial and Methods: Patients hospitalized in the ICU two years before and after the COVID-19 pandemic between March 15, 2019, and March 15, 2021, were divided into two groups, and their blood cultures were evaluated retrospectively. Isolated microorganisms and their antibiotic susceptibility were analyzed. \nResults: A total of 1282 patients' blood cultures were analyzed, and demographic data were similar between groups. Blood culture growth was detected in 39.6% (n=202) of the patients in the pre-pandemic period and 41% (n=317) in the pandemic period. Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 71.3%, gram-negative bacteria in 21.6%, and Candida spp. in 7.1% of the population. Klebsiella spp. was significantly higher, and Enterococcus spp. was significantly lower in blood cultures during the pandemic. In the COVID-19 period, although not significant, a decrease in antibiotic susceptibility was detected for Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella spp., E.coli, Enterobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. There was a statistically significant decrease in susceptibility to teicoplanin and linezolid in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). During the pandemic, 57.6% (n=172) of the patients were positive for COVID-19. In COVID-19-positive patients, while Candida spp. was significantly higher, no decrease in antifungal susceptibility was detected. \nConclusion: During the pandemic, antibiotic susceptibility to gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms decreased. Although there was a significant increase in Candida spp. rates in COVID-19-positive patients, there was no decrease in their antifungal susceptibility.","PeriodicalId":134281,"journal":{"name":"Phoenix Medical Journal","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phoenix Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38175/phnx.1222179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究旨在鉴定2019冠状病毒病大流行前和期间某三级中心ICU住院患者血培养分离的微生物种类,并调查其抗生素敏感性。材料与方法:将2019年3月15日至2021年3月15日COVID-19大流行前后两年在ICU住院的患者分为两组,回顾性评价其血培养。对分离的微生物及其药敏进行了分析。结果:共分析1282例患者血培养,组间人口学数据相似。39.6% (n=202)的患者在大流行前检测到血培养物生长,41% (n=317)的患者在大流行期间检测到血培养物生长。革兰氏阳性菌占71.3%,革兰氏阴性菌占21.6%,念珠菌占7.1%。在大流行期间,克雷伯氏菌在血培养中显著升高,肠球菌在血培养中显著降低。在COVID-19期间,金黄色葡萄球菌、克雷伯氏菌、大肠杆菌、肠杆菌和假单胞菌对抗生素的敏感性虽无显著下降,但对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)对替柯planin和利奈唑胺的敏感性下降有统计学意义。在大流行期间,57.6% (n=172)的患者呈COVID-19阳性。在covid -19阳性患者中,虽然念珠菌含量明显升高,但抗真菌敏感性未见下降。结论:在大流行期间,革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性微生物的抗生素敏感性下降。虽然在covid -19阳性患者中念珠菌感染率显著升高,但其抗真菌敏感性并未下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 Pandemisi Öncesi ve Döneminde Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Takip Edilen Hastaların Kan Kültürü İzolatlarının Tür Dağılımı ve Antibiyotik Duyarlılıklarının Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif, Tek Merkez Analizi
Introduction: This study aims to identify the microorganism species isolated from blood cultures of patients hospitalized in the ICU of a tertiary center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and to investigate their antibiotic susceptibility. Material and Methods: Patients hospitalized in the ICU two years before and after the COVID-19 pandemic between March 15, 2019, and March 15, 2021, were divided into two groups, and their blood cultures were evaluated retrospectively. Isolated microorganisms and their antibiotic susceptibility were analyzed. Results: A total of 1282 patients' blood cultures were analyzed, and demographic data were similar between groups. Blood culture growth was detected in 39.6% (n=202) of the patients in the pre-pandemic period and 41% (n=317) in the pandemic period. Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 71.3%, gram-negative bacteria in 21.6%, and Candida spp. in 7.1% of the population. Klebsiella spp. was significantly higher, and Enterococcus spp. was significantly lower in blood cultures during the pandemic. In the COVID-19 period, although not significant, a decrease in antibiotic susceptibility was detected for Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella spp., E.coli, Enterobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. There was a statistically significant decrease in susceptibility to teicoplanin and linezolid in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). During the pandemic, 57.6% (n=172) of the patients were positive for COVID-19. In COVID-19-positive patients, while Candida spp. was significantly higher, no decrease in antifungal susceptibility was detected. Conclusion: During the pandemic, antibiotic susceptibility to gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms decreased. Although there was a significant increase in Candida spp. rates in COVID-19-positive patients, there was no decrease in their antifungal susceptibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous triceps hematoma and radial nerve impairment due to warfarin use TOXOPLASMOSIS: SEROPREVALENCE IN WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE AND APPROACH IN PREGNANCY Adrenal Ganglioneuroma with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Rare Case Report Definition of Sepsis and Novel Biomarkers for Sepsis Acil Serviste İdrar Sondası Takılma Nedenlerinin Analizi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1