接受,拒绝,推迟:出版前审查如何降低英文维基百科新人的工作效率

Jodi Schneider, Bluma S. Gelley, Aaron L Halfaker
{"title":"接受,拒绝,推迟:出版前审查如何降低英文维基百科新人的工作效率","authors":"Jodi Schneider, Bluma S. Gelley, Aaron L Halfaker","doi":"10.1145/2641580.2641614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wikipedia needs to attract and retain newcomers while also increasing the quality of its content. Yet new Wikipedia users are disproportionately affected by the quality assurance mechanisms designed to thwart spammers and promoters. English Wikipedia's Articles for Creation provides a protected space for drafting new articles, which are reviewed against minimum quality guidelines before they are published. In this study we explore how this drafting process has affected the productivity of newcomers in Wikipedia. Using a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach, we show how the process's pre-publication review, which is intended to improve the success of newcomers, in fact decreases newcomer productivity in English Wikipedia and offer recommendations for system designers.","PeriodicalId":447989,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accept, decline, postpone: How newcomer productivity is reduced in English Wikipedia by pre-publication review\",\"authors\":\"Jodi Schneider, Bluma S. Gelley, Aaron L Halfaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2641580.2641614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wikipedia needs to attract and retain newcomers while also increasing the quality of its content. Yet new Wikipedia users are disproportionately affected by the quality assurance mechanisms designed to thwart spammers and promoters. English Wikipedia's Articles for Creation provides a protected space for drafting new articles, which are reviewed against minimum quality guidelines before they are published. In this study we explore how this drafting process has affected the productivity of newcomers in Wikipedia. Using a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach, we show how the process's pre-publication review, which is intended to improve the success of newcomers, in fact decreases newcomer productivity in English Wikipedia and offer recommendations for system designers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2641580.2641614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2641580.2641614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

维基百科需要吸引和留住新用户,同时提高其内容的质量。然而,维基百科的新用户不成比例地受到旨在阻止垃圾邮件制造者和推动者的质量保证机制的影响。英文维基百科的“创作条目”为起草新条目提供了一个受保护的空间,这些条目在发布之前会按照最低质量准则进行审查。在这项研究中,我们探讨了这个起草过程是如何影响维基百科新人的生产力的。使用混合的定性和定量方法,我们展示了该过程的出版前审查,其目的是提高新手的成功,实际上是如何降低英语维基百科中新手的生产力,并为系统设计者提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accept, decline, postpone: How newcomer productivity is reduced in English Wikipedia by pre-publication review
Wikipedia needs to attract and retain newcomers while also increasing the quality of its content. Yet new Wikipedia users are disproportionately affected by the quality assurance mechanisms designed to thwart spammers and promoters. English Wikipedia's Articles for Creation provides a protected space for drafting new articles, which are reviewed against minimum quality guidelines before they are published. In this study we explore how this drafting process has affected the productivity of newcomers in Wikipedia. Using a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach, we show how the process's pre-publication review, which is intended to improve the success of newcomers, in fact decreases newcomer productivity in English Wikipedia and offer recommendations for system designers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contropedia - the analysis and visualization of controversies in Wikipedia articles Supporting awareness of content-related controversies in a Wiki-based learning environment What do Chinese-language microblog users do with Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia? A case study of information engagement Chinese-language literature about Wikipedia: a meta-analysis of academic search engine result pages Volunteer Attraction and Retention in Open Source Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1