B. Bischoff, L. Geyer, M. Reiser, Ullrich Mueller Lisse
{"title":"应用自动运动校正提高冠状动脉CT血管造影图像质量","authors":"B. Bischoff, L. Geyer, M. Reiser, Ullrich Mueller Lisse","doi":"10.5812/acvi.28932v2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Motion artifacts that degrade image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with high heart rates may be reduced with specific automatic motion correction algorithms (AMC). Objectives: We compared coronary-artery delineation between AMC and conventional CCTA reconstruction (CR). Patients and Methods: CCTA images (clinical single-source-64-slice-CT system) of 17 consecutive patients with heart rates exceeding 55 bpm were reconstructed with both CR and AMC during the individually best-suited phase of the cardiac cycle. Two independent readers who were blinded to the reconstruction algorithm scored image quality of each coronary artery segment (AHA 15-segment-model; 1: non-diagnostic - 4: excellent). In case of disagreement a third blinded reader assigned a final score. Two-tailed statistical tests (Wilcoxon-matched-pairs, Pearson-correlation) were significant at P < 0.05. Results: Mean heart rate during CCTA was 61 ± 8 bpm. CCTA quality improved significantly in the RCA (good-or-excellent in 11/17 AMC vs. 5/17 CR, P = 0.018) and LAD (15/17 vs. 7/17, P = 0.031). Non-diagnostic CCTA in the RCA, LM, LAD, and LCX reduced from 16/68 (CR, 24%) to 7/68 (AMC, 10%). Significant motion correction was observed at low (≤ 60 bpm; P = 0.008), intermediate (61-70 bpm; P < 0.001), and high heart rates (> 70 bpm; P = 0.021). Inter-reader agreement was good. (inter-class-correlation, 0.762). Conclusions: CCTA image quality improves significantly with AMC in patients with high heart rates and reduces the proportion of non-diagnostic examinations.","PeriodicalId":429543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved image quality of coronary CT angiography using automatic motion correction\",\"authors\":\"B. Bischoff, L. Geyer, M. Reiser, Ullrich Mueller Lisse\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/acvi.28932v2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Motion artifacts that degrade image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with high heart rates may be reduced with specific automatic motion correction algorithms (AMC). Objectives: We compared coronary-artery delineation between AMC and conventional CCTA reconstruction (CR). Patients and Methods: CCTA images (clinical single-source-64-slice-CT system) of 17 consecutive patients with heart rates exceeding 55 bpm were reconstructed with both CR and AMC during the individually best-suited phase of the cardiac cycle. Two independent readers who were blinded to the reconstruction algorithm scored image quality of each coronary artery segment (AHA 15-segment-model; 1: non-diagnostic - 4: excellent). In case of disagreement a third blinded reader assigned a final score. Two-tailed statistical tests (Wilcoxon-matched-pairs, Pearson-correlation) were significant at P < 0.05. Results: Mean heart rate during CCTA was 61 ± 8 bpm. CCTA quality improved significantly in the RCA (good-or-excellent in 11/17 AMC vs. 5/17 CR, P = 0.018) and LAD (15/17 vs. 7/17, P = 0.031). Non-diagnostic CCTA in the RCA, LM, LAD, and LCX reduced from 16/68 (CR, 24%) to 7/68 (AMC, 10%). Significant motion correction was observed at low (≤ 60 bpm; P = 0.008), intermediate (61-70 bpm; P < 0.001), and high heart rates (> 70 bpm; P = 0.021). Inter-reader agreement was good. (inter-class-correlation, 0.762). Conclusions: CCTA image quality improves significantly with AMC in patients with high heart rates and reduces the proportion of non-diagnostic examinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/acvi.28932v2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/acvi.28932v2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:高心率患者冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)图像质量下降的运动伪影可以通过特定的自动运动校正算法(AMC)来降低。目的:我们比较了AMC和传统CCTA重建(CR)的冠状动脉描绘。患者和方法:连续17例心率超过55bpm的患者的CCTA图像(临床单源64层ct系统)在各自最适合的心脏周期阶段用CR和AMC重建。两名独立的读者对重建算法不知情,对每个冠状动脉段的图像质量进行评分(AHA 15段模型;1:非诊断性- 4:优秀)。如果意见不一致,则由第三位盲眼读者给出最终分数。双侧统计检验(wilcox - matching -pairs, Pearson-correlation) P < 0.05显著。结果:CCTA期间平均心率为61±8bpm。CCTA质量在RCA (11/17 AMC vs 5/17 CR, P = 0.018)和LAD (15/17 vs 7/17, P = 0.031)中显著改善。RCA、LM、LAD和LCX的非诊断性CCTA从16/68 (CR, 24%)降至7/68 (AMC, 10%)。在低(≤60 bpm;P = 0.008),中级(61-70 bpm;P < 0.001)和高心率(> 70 bpm;P = 0.021)。读者之间的共识很好。(inter-class-correlation, 0.762)。结论:高心率患者采用AMC后,CCTA图像质量明显改善,非诊断性检查比例降低。
Improved image quality of coronary CT angiography using automatic motion correction
Background: Motion artifacts that degrade image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with high heart rates may be reduced with specific automatic motion correction algorithms (AMC). Objectives: We compared coronary-artery delineation between AMC and conventional CCTA reconstruction (CR). Patients and Methods: CCTA images (clinical single-source-64-slice-CT system) of 17 consecutive patients with heart rates exceeding 55 bpm were reconstructed with both CR and AMC during the individually best-suited phase of the cardiac cycle. Two independent readers who were blinded to the reconstruction algorithm scored image quality of each coronary artery segment (AHA 15-segment-model; 1: non-diagnostic - 4: excellent). In case of disagreement a third blinded reader assigned a final score. Two-tailed statistical tests (Wilcoxon-matched-pairs, Pearson-correlation) were significant at P < 0.05. Results: Mean heart rate during CCTA was 61 ± 8 bpm. CCTA quality improved significantly in the RCA (good-or-excellent in 11/17 AMC vs. 5/17 CR, P = 0.018) and LAD (15/17 vs. 7/17, P = 0.031). Non-diagnostic CCTA in the RCA, LM, LAD, and LCX reduced from 16/68 (CR, 24%) to 7/68 (AMC, 10%). Significant motion correction was observed at low (≤ 60 bpm; P = 0.008), intermediate (61-70 bpm; P < 0.001), and high heart rates (> 70 bpm; P = 0.021). Inter-reader agreement was good. (inter-class-correlation, 0.762). Conclusions: CCTA image quality improves significantly with AMC in patients with high heart rates and reduces the proportion of non-diagnostic examinations.