公平竞争?对独立地方政府审查小组对新南威尔士州市政税收评估的回应

J. Drew, B. Dollery
{"title":"公平竞争?对独立地方政府审查小组对新南威尔士州市政税收评估的回应","authors":"J. Drew, B. Dollery","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2666306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Independent Local Government Review Panel (ILGRP) recently handed down its final report on the financial sustainability of New South Wales (NSW) councils. The report identifies a number of problems in relation to local government rating practice and recommends that the NSW Government consider replacing the present rate‑pegging regime, changing the base from which council rates are levied for high‑density unit complexes and reducing the number of exemptions and concessions currently available. At the heart of the recommendations is an empirically untested contention that the current system of council rates in NSW is inherently inequitable in terms of both inter‑municipal equity and capacity to pay. We begin our assessment of the ILGRP claims by reviewing the theoretical foundations of council property taxes. We then provide a synoptic account of NSW municipal rating before empirically assessing equity under the current arrangements. Finally, we propose a set of public policy responses which address the equity problems identified in our analysis.","PeriodicalId":198089,"journal":{"name":"Australian Tax Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Fair Go? A Response to the Independent Local Government Review Panel's Assessment of Municipal Taxation in NSW\",\"authors\":\"J. Drew, B. Dollery\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2666306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Independent Local Government Review Panel (ILGRP) recently handed down its final report on the financial sustainability of New South Wales (NSW) councils. The report identifies a number of problems in relation to local government rating practice and recommends that the NSW Government consider replacing the present rate‑pegging regime, changing the base from which council rates are levied for high‑density unit complexes and reducing the number of exemptions and concessions currently available. At the heart of the recommendations is an empirically untested contention that the current system of council rates in NSW is inherently inequitable in terms of both inter‑municipal equity and capacity to pay. We begin our assessment of the ILGRP claims by reviewing the theoretical foundations of council property taxes. We then provide a synoptic account of NSW municipal rating before empirically assessing equity under the current arrangements. Finally, we propose a set of public policy responses which address the equity problems identified in our analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Tax Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Tax Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Tax Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

独立地方政府审查小组(ILGRP)最近发布了关于新南威尔士州议会财政可持续性的最终报告。该报告指出了与地方政府评级做法有关的一些问题,并建议新南威尔士州政府考虑取代目前的挂钩费率制度,改变对高密度公寓综合体征收市政费率的基数,减少目前可获得的豁免和优惠的数量。这些建议的核心是一个未经经验检验的论点,即新南威尔士州目前的市议会费率制度在市政间公平和支付能力方面本质上是不公平的。我们通过审查市政财产税的理论基础来开始对ILGRP索赔的评估。然后,在实证评估当前安排下的股权之前,我们提供了新南威尔士州市政评级的概要说明。最后,我们提出了一套公共政策回应,以解决我们分析中确定的公平问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Fair Go? A Response to the Independent Local Government Review Panel's Assessment of Municipal Taxation in NSW
The Independent Local Government Review Panel (ILGRP) recently handed down its final report on the financial sustainability of New South Wales (NSW) councils. The report identifies a number of problems in relation to local government rating practice and recommends that the NSW Government consider replacing the present rate‑pegging regime, changing the base from which council rates are levied for high‑density unit complexes and reducing the number of exemptions and concessions currently available. At the heart of the recommendations is an empirically untested contention that the current system of council rates in NSW is inherently inequitable in terms of both inter‑municipal equity and capacity to pay. We begin our assessment of the ILGRP claims by reviewing the theoretical foundations of council property taxes. We then provide a synoptic account of NSW municipal rating before empirically assessing equity under the current arrangements. Finally, we propose a set of public policy responses which address the equity problems identified in our analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Fair Go? A Response to the Independent Local Government Review Panel's Assessment of Municipal Taxation in NSW Pattern of Distributions Test for Discretionary Trusts: Defects Reveal Questionable Policy Design and Implementation The Fiscal Impact of the Trans‑Tasman Travel Arrangement: Have the Costs Become Too High?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1