{"title":"基于机器学习的多人脸检测","authors":"Hajar Filali, J. Riffi, A. M. Mahraz, H. Tairi","doi":"10.1109/ISACV.2018.8354058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facial detection has recently attracted increasing interest due to the multitude of applications that result from it. In this context, we have used methods based on machine learning that allows a machine to evolve through a learning process, and to perform tasks that are difficult or impossible to fill by more conventional algorithmic means. According to this context, we have established a comparative study between four methods (Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost, GF-SVM, GF-NN). These techniques vary according to the way in which they extract the data and the adopted learning algorithms. The first two methods “Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost” are based on the Boosting algorithm, which is used both for selection and for learning a strong classifier with a cascade classification. While the last two classification methods “GF-SVM, GF-NN” use the Gabor filter to extract the characteristics. From this study, we found that the detection time varies from one method to another. Indeed, the LBP-AdaBoost and Haar-AdaBoost methods are the fastest compared to others. But in terms of detection rate and false detection rate, the Haar-AdaBoost method remains the best of the four methods.","PeriodicalId":184662,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple face detection based on machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Hajar Filali, J. Riffi, A. M. Mahraz, H. Tairi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISACV.2018.8354058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Facial detection has recently attracted increasing interest due to the multitude of applications that result from it. In this context, we have used methods based on machine learning that allows a machine to evolve through a learning process, and to perform tasks that are difficult or impossible to fill by more conventional algorithmic means. According to this context, we have established a comparative study between four methods (Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost, GF-SVM, GF-NN). These techniques vary according to the way in which they extract the data and the adopted learning algorithms. The first two methods “Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost” are based on the Boosting algorithm, which is used both for selection and for learning a strong classifier with a cascade classification. While the last two classification methods “GF-SVM, GF-NN” use the Gabor filter to extract the characteristics. From this study, we found that the detection time varies from one method to another. Indeed, the LBP-AdaBoost and Haar-AdaBoost methods are the fastest compared to others. But in terms of detection rate and false detection rate, the Haar-AdaBoost method remains the best of the four methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISACV.2018.8354058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISACV.2018.8354058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Facial detection has recently attracted increasing interest due to the multitude of applications that result from it. In this context, we have used methods based on machine learning that allows a machine to evolve through a learning process, and to perform tasks that are difficult or impossible to fill by more conventional algorithmic means. According to this context, we have established a comparative study between four methods (Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost, GF-SVM, GF-NN). These techniques vary according to the way in which they extract the data and the adopted learning algorithms. The first two methods “Haar-AdaBoost, LBP-AdaBoost” are based on the Boosting algorithm, which is used both for selection and for learning a strong classifier with a cascade classification. While the last two classification methods “GF-SVM, GF-NN” use the Gabor filter to extract the characteristics. From this study, we found that the detection time varies from one method to another. Indeed, the LBP-AdaBoost and Haar-AdaBoost methods are the fastest compared to others. But in terms of detection rate and false detection rate, the Haar-AdaBoost method remains the best of the four methods.