辅助服务设计框架

Samuel Glismann, F. Nobel
{"title":"辅助服务设计框架","authors":"Samuel Glismann, F. Nobel","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2017.7982008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a fast changing electrical power sector the design of ancillary services is challenged and policy makers are required to take decisions on the adjustment of current ancillary services practices and on the introduction of new ancillary services. Even though ancillary services are crucial for the reliability of unbundled power systems, current literature does not provide a structured approach to describe and compare the design of different ancillary services. We propose a generic framework for ancillary service designs that allows for a comparative ancillary service assessment as a first step towards a comprehensive evaluation framework. Applicability of the framework and its generic design variables is shown by comparing ancillary services of different objectives and different regulatory areas.","PeriodicalId":416082,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for ancillary services design\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Glismann, F. Nobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2017.7982008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a fast changing electrical power sector the design of ancillary services is challenged and policy makers are required to take decisions on the adjustment of current ancillary services practices and on the introduction of new ancillary services. Even though ancillary services are crucial for the reliability of unbundled power systems, current literature does not provide a structured approach to describe and compare the design of different ancillary services. We propose a generic framework for ancillary service designs that allows for a comparative ancillary service assessment as a first step towards a comprehensive evaluation framework. Applicability of the framework and its generic design variables is shown by comparing ancillary services of different objectives and different regulatory areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7982008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7982008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在快速变化的电力行业中,辅助服务的设计受到挑战,政策制定者需要就调整当前的辅助服务做法和引入新的辅助服务作出决定。尽管辅助服务对非捆绑电力系统的可靠性至关重要,但目前的文献并没有提供一个结构化的方法来描述和比较不同辅助服务的设计。我们提出了一个辅助服务设计的通用框架,允许比较辅助服务评估作为迈向全面评估框架的第一步。通过比较不同目标和不同监管领域的辅助服务,表明了框架及其通用设计变量的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A framework for ancillary services design
In a fast changing electrical power sector the design of ancillary services is challenged and policy makers are required to take decisions on the adjustment of current ancillary services practices and on the introduction of new ancillary services. Even though ancillary services are crucial for the reliability of unbundled power systems, current literature does not provide a structured approach to describe and compare the design of different ancillary services. We propose a generic framework for ancillary service designs that allows for a comparative ancillary service assessment as a first step towards a comprehensive evaluation framework. Applicability of the framework and its generic design variables is shown by comparing ancillary services of different objectives and different regulatory areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Market integration VS temporal granularity: How to provide needed flexibility resources? FV-battery community energy systems: Economic, energy independence and network deferral analysis Adequacy of power capacity during winter peaks in Finland An analysis of market mechanism and bidding strategy for power balancing market mixed by conventional and renewable energy Network pricing for smart grids considering customers' diversified contribution to system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1