发展中国家的技术进步、技术扩散和机遇:来自中国的经验教训

S. Inomata, D. Taglioni
{"title":"发展中国家的技术进步、技术扩散和机遇:来自中国的经验教训","authors":"S. Inomata, D. Taglioni","doi":"10.30875/64d4d924-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nature of technology used in products plays a major role in determining the governance structure of value chains and the benefits of participation for developing countries. Standardization through breaking production into modules with a high degree of functional autonomy (limited mutual interference between modules) can dramatically reduce the amount of research and development (R&D), learning by doing, and the number of complementary skills needed to produce a good. This greatly increases opportunities for developing country firms to participate in formerly capital-intensive industries through reducing entry costs into global value chains. However, widespread access to standardized products with little ability to modify technical features can lead to an excessive supply of homogeneous products in a local market, resulting in intense price competition and limited technology transfer. By contrast, technology that facilitates scope for product modification and greater interaction with technology owners can help boost technology transfer and product upgrading by developing country firms. The chapter illustrates this interaction between changes in technology and opportunities for developing countries through developments in the automotive and mobile phone handset industries, with a particular reference to China’s growth experience. It also finds that automation is likely to have only a limited impact on developing countries’ opportunities to participate in value chains through the offshoring of production by high-income countries, at least in the short term. • Policies for helping domestically owned firms become technologically standalone – what some might refer to as “techno-nationalism” – do not necessarily help countries move into higher valueadded production within GVCs. Instead, policymakers should encourage firms to be full partners in global technology ecosystems and to pursue open source innovation solutions. • Automation might become a threat to developing country employment in the long term if consumption does not increase fast enough to generate sufficient additional labor demand to offset the labor-saving impact of technological change. In the short term, however, automation will not dramatically reduce the attractiveness of low-wage destinations, especially for labor-intensive tasks that require human dexterity, such as in the apparel industry. • While automation does not pose immediate risks, governments need to develop a comprehensive digital strategy to maximize the gains from GVCs. * This chapter draws from background studies and ongoing research collaboration with the following researchers: Chiara Criscuolo, Yoshihiro Hashiguchi, Keiko Ito, Jonathan Timmis, Ke Ding, Shiro Hioki, Mai Fujita, Tim Sturgeon, Eric Thun, Yuqing Xing, Satoshi Nakano, Kazuhiko Nishimura and Jiyoung Kim. 84 • Technological innovation, supply chain trade, and workers in a globalized world","PeriodicalId":296231,"journal":{"name":"Global Value Chain Development Report 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technological progress, diffusion, and opportunities for developing countries: lessons from China\",\"authors\":\"S. Inomata, D. Taglioni\",\"doi\":\"10.30875/64d4d924-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The nature of technology used in products plays a major role in determining the governance structure of value chains and the benefits of participation for developing countries. Standardization through breaking production into modules with a high degree of functional autonomy (limited mutual interference between modules) can dramatically reduce the amount of research and development (R&D), learning by doing, and the number of complementary skills needed to produce a good. This greatly increases opportunities for developing country firms to participate in formerly capital-intensive industries through reducing entry costs into global value chains. However, widespread access to standardized products with little ability to modify technical features can lead to an excessive supply of homogeneous products in a local market, resulting in intense price competition and limited technology transfer. By contrast, technology that facilitates scope for product modification and greater interaction with technology owners can help boost technology transfer and product upgrading by developing country firms. The chapter illustrates this interaction between changes in technology and opportunities for developing countries through developments in the automotive and mobile phone handset industries, with a particular reference to China’s growth experience. It also finds that automation is likely to have only a limited impact on developing countries’ opportunities to participate in value chains through the offshoring of production by high-income countries, at least in the short term. • Policies for helping domestically owned firms become technologically standalone – what some might refer to as “techno-nationalism” – do not necessarily help countries move into higher valueadded production within GVCs. Instead, policymakers should encourage firms to be full partners in global technology ecosystems and to pursue open source innovation solutions. • Automation might become a threat to developing country employment in the long term if consumption does not increase fast enough to generate sufficient additional labor demand to offset the labor-saving impact of technological change. In the short term, however, automation will not dramatically reduce the attractiveness of low-wage destinations, especially for labor-intensive tasks that require human dexterity, such as in the apparel industry. • While automation does not pose immediate risks, governments need to develop a comprehensive digital strategy to maximize the gains from GVCs. * This chapter draws from background studies and ongoing research collaboration with the following researchers: Chiara Criscuolo, Yoshihiro Hashiguchi, Keiko Ito, Jonathan Timmis, Ke Ding, Shiro Hioki, Mai Fujita, Tim Sturgeon, Eric Thun, Yuqing Xing, Satoshi Nakano, Kazuhiko Nishimura and Jiyoung Kim. 84 • Technological innovation, supply chain trade, and workers in a globalized world\",\"PeriodicalId\":296231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Value Chain Development Report 2019\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Value Chain Development Report 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30875/64d4d924-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Value Chain Development Report 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30875/64d4d924-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

产品中使用的技术的性质在决定价值链的治理结构和发展中国家参与的利益方面发挥着重要作用。通过将生产分解为具有高度功能自治(模块之间的相互干扰有限)的模块进行标准化,可以显著减少研究和开发(R&D)的数量、边做边学以及生产产品所需的互补技能的数量。通过降低进入全球价值链的成本,这大大增加了发展中国家企业参与以前资本密集型产业的机会。但是,广泛使用几乎没有能力修改技术特征的标准化产品可能导致当地市场上同质产品供应过剩,从而造成激烈的价格竞争和有限的技术转让。相比之下,促进产品修改范围和与技术所有者更大互动的技术可以帮助促进发展中国家公司的技术转让和产品升级。本章通过汽车和手机行业的发展说明了技术变化与发展中国家机遇之间的相互作用,并特别提到了中国的增长经验。报告还发现,至少在短期内,自动化可能只会对发展中国家通过高收入国家的生产外包参与价值链的机会产生有限的影响。•帮助国内企业在技术上独立的政策——有些人可能称之为“技术民族主义”——并不一定有助于各国在全球价值链中转向更高附加值的生产。相反,政策制定者应该鼓励企业成为全球技术生态系统的全面合作伙伴,并寻求开源创新解决方案。•如果消费增长速度不够快,不足以产生足够的额外劳动力需求,以抵消技术变革带来的节省劳动力的影响,自动化可能会对发展中国家的就业构成长期威胁。然而,在短期内,自动化不会显著降低低工资目的地的吸引力,特别是对于需要人类灵巧的劳动密集型任务,比如服装行业。•虽然自动化不会立即带来风险,但政府需要制定全面的数字战略,以最大限度地提高全球价值链的收益。*本章从背景研究和正在进行的研究合作与以下研究人员:Chiara Criscuolo, Yoshihiro Hashiguchi, Keiko Ito, Jonathan Timmis, Ke Ding, Shiro Hioki, Mai Fujita, Tim Sturgeon, Eric Thun, Yuqing Xing, Satoshi Nakano, Kazuhiko Nishimura和Jiyoung Kim。84•技术创新,供应链贸易和全球化世界中的工人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technological progress, diffusion, and opportunities for developing countries: lessons from China
The nature of technology used in products plays a major role in determining the governance structure of value chains and the benefits of participation for developing countries. Standardization through breaking production into modules with a high degree of functional autonomy (limited mutual interference between modules) can dramatically reduce the amount of research and development (R&D), learning by doing, and the number of complementary skills needed to produce a good. This greatly increases opportunities for developing country firms to participate in formerly capital-intensive industries through reducing entry costs into global value chains. However, widespread access to standardized products with little ability to modify technical features can lead to an excessive supply of homogeneous products in a local market, resulting in intense price competition and limited technology transfer. By contrast, technology that facilitates scope for product modification and greater interaction with technology owners can help boost technology transfer and product upgrading by developing country firms. The chapter illustrates this interaction between changes in technology and opportunities for developing countries through developments in the automotive and mobile phone handset industries, with a particular reference to China’s growth experience. It also finds that automation is likely to have only a limited impact on developing countries’ opportunities to participate in value chains through the offshoring of production by high-income countries, at least in the short term. • Policies for helping domestically owned firms become technologically standalone – what some might refer to as “techno-nationalism” – do not necessarily help countries move into higher valueadded production within GVCs. Instead, policymakers should encourage firms to be full partners in global technology ecosystems and to pursue open source innovation solutions. • Automation might become a threat to developing country employment in the long term if consumption does not increase fast enough to generate sufficient additional labor demand to offset the labor-saving impact of technological change. In the short term, however, automation will not dramatically reduce the attractiveness of low-wage destinations, especially for labor-intensive tasks that require human dexterity, such as in the apparel industry. • While automation does not pose immediate risks, governments need to develop a comprehensive digital strategy to maximize the gains from GVCs. * This chapter draws from background studies and ongoing research collaboration with the following researchers: Chiara Criscuolo, Yoshihiro Hashiguchi, Keiko Ito, Jonathan Timmis, Ke Ding, Shiro Hioki, Mai Fujita, Tim Sturgeon, Eric Thun, Yuqing Xing, Satoshi Nakano, Kazuhiko Nishimura and Jiyoung Kim. 84 • Technological innovation, supply chain trade, and workers in a globalized world
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains Acknowledgments Executive summary Improving the accounting frameworks for analyses of global value chains Global value chains and employment in developing economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1