除鹿对日本蜱虫丰度的影响:基于鹿密度控制的野外试验验证

Hiroyuki Matsuyama, N. Agetsuma, A. Okada, Maki Suzuki
{"title":"除鹿对日本蜱虫丰度的影响:基于鹿密度控制的野外试验验证","authors":"Hiroyuki Matsuyama, N. Agetsuma, A. Okada, Maki Suzuki","doi":"10.7601/mez.70.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instalment of deer fences around agricultural fields may, as a side benefit, reduce the risk of tick-borne diseases in humans. We examined tick (Haemaphysalis) density on the ground after two years of exclusion using three separate deer fences. Deer density in an exclosure (EX) had been kept as zero for 14 years, deer density in an enclosure (HD) had been kept constantly stocked for 14 years with around 20 deer km−2, and the second enclosure (OD) had been stocked for 11 years with around 20 deer km−2, after which time the deer were excluded for two years. Tick densities inside the three fences were monitored for two years after two years of deer exclusion from OD. In the first year, tick density in OD was as high as that in HD, and was significantly higher than that in EX. In the second year, however, tick density in OD decreased to a similar level to that in EX. These results suggest that tick density in the environment decreases after three years of exclusion. Our findings support the effectiveness of culling and fencing of deer with the aim of preventing the risk of tick-borne diseases.","PeriodicalId":104111,"journal":{"name":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","volume":"3588 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of deer exclusion on tick abundance in Japan: the verification based on field experiment for controlling deer density\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Matsuyama, N. Agetsuma, A. Okada, Maki Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.7601/mez.70.153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Instalment of deer fences around agricultural fields may, as a side benefit, reduce the risk of tick-borne diseases in humans. We examined tick (Haemaphysalis) density on the ground after two years of exclusion using three separate deer fences. Deer density in an exclosure (EX) had been kept as zero for 14 years, deer density in an enclosure (HD) had been kept constantly stocked for 14 years with around 20 deer km−2, and the second enclosure (OD) had been stocked for 11 years with around 20 deer km−2, after which time the deer were excluded for two years. Tick densities inside the three fences were monitored for two years after two years of deer exclusion from OD. In the first year, tick density in OD was as high as that in HD, and was significantly higher than that in EX. In the second year, however, tick density in OD decreased to a similar level to that in EX. These results suggest that tick density in the environment decreases after three years of exclusion. Our findings support the effectiveness of culling and fencing of deer with the aim of preventing the risk of tick-borne diseases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Entomology and Zoology\",\"volume\":\"3588 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Entomology and Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7601/mez.70.153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7601/mez.70.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在农田周围设置鹿栏,作为附带的好处,可以降低人类感染蜱传疾病的风险。在使用三个单独的鹿栅栏隔离两年后,我们检查了地面上的蜱(血蜱)密度。一个围场(EX)的鹿密度为0保持了14年,一个围场(HD)的鹿密度保持了14年,鹿密度保持在20 km−2左右,第二个围场(OD)的鹿密度保持了11年,鹿密度保持在20 km−2左右,之后将鹿排除在外2年。对3个围栏内的蜱虫密度进行了2年的监测。第一年OD区蜱虫密度与HD区相当,且显著高于EX区,第二年OD区蜱虫密度下降至与EX区相近的水平,说明3年后环境蜱虫密度有所下降。我们的研究结果支持了以预防蜱传疾病风险为目的的鹿的扑杀和围栏的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of deer exclusion on tick abundance in Japan: the verification based on field experiment for controlling deer density
Instalment of deer fences around agricultural fields may, as a side benefit, reduce the risk of tick-borne diseases in humans. We examined tick (Haemaphysalis) density on the ground after two years of exclusion using three separate deer fences. Deer density in an exclosure (EX) had been kept as zero for 14 years, deer density in an enclosure (HD) had been kept constantly stocked for 14 years with around 20 deer km−2, and the second enclosure (OD) had been stocked for 11 years with around 20 deer km−2, after which time the deer were excluded for two years. Tick densities inside the three fences were monitored for two years after two years of deer exclusion from OD. In the first year, tick density in OD was as high as that in HD, and was significantly higher than that in EX. In the second year, however, tick density in OD decreased to a similar level to that in EX. These results suggest that tick density in the environment decreases after three years of exclusion. Our findings support the effectiveness of culling and fencing of deer with the aim of preventing the risk of tick-borne diseases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
群馬県片品村尾瀬ヶ原で採集された蚊幼虫 A New Record of Hybomitra tarandina (Linné, 1758) on Honshu Island, Japan with Remarks on the Ecological Aspects Referring to Known Records (Diptera: Tabanidae) 富山県衛生研究所における同定依頼検査と相談で記録した富山県内のヤスデ被害 Blood-meal identification of seven species of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in Japan Japanese summaries of papers written in English in this issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1