第一原则脆弱性评估

J. Kupsch, B. Miller, E. Heymann, Eduardo César
{"title":"第一原则脆弱性评估","authors":"J. Kupsch, B. Miller, E. Heymann, Eduardo César","doi":"10.1145/1866835.1866852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clouds and Grids offer significant challenges to providing secure infrastructure software. As part of a our effort to secure such middleware, we present First Principles Vulnerability Assessment (FPVA), a new analyst-centric (manual) technique that aims to focus the analyst's attention on the parts of the software system and its resources that are most likely to contain vulnerabilities that would provide access to high-value assets. FPVA finds new threats to a system and is not dependent on a list of known threats.\n Manual assessment is labor-intensive, making the use of automated assessment tools quite attractive. We compared the results of FPVA to those of the top commercial tools, providing the first significant evaluation of these tools against a real-world known collection of serious vulnerabilities. While these tools can find common problems in a program's source code, they miss a significant number of serious vulnerabilities found by FPVA. We are now using the results of this comparison study to guide our future research into improving automated software assessment.","PeriodicalId":300613,"journal":{"name":"Cloud Computing Security Workshop","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First principles vulnerability assessment\",\"authors\":\"J. Kupsch, B. Miller, E. Heymann, Eduardo César\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1866835.1866852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clouds and Grids offer significant challenges to providing secure infrastructure software. As part of a our effort to secure such middleware, we present First Principles Vulnerability Assessment (FPVA), a new analyst-centric (manual) technique that aims to focus the analyst's attention on the parts of the software system and its resources that are most likely to contain vulnerabilities that would provide access to high-value assets. FPVA finds new threats to a system and is not dependent on a list of known threats.\\n Manual assessment is labor-intensive, making the use of automated assessment tools quite attractive. We compared the results of FPVA to those of the top commercial tools, providing the first significant evaluation of these tools against a real-world known collection of serious vulnerabilities. While these tools can find common problems in a program's source code, they miss a significant number of serious vulnerabilities found by FPVA. We are now using the results of this comparison study to guide our future research into improving automated software assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cloud Computing Security Workshop\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cloud Computing Security Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1866835.1866852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cloud Computing Security Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1866835.1866852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

云和网格为提供安全的基础设施软件带来了重大挑战。作为我们努力确保中间件安全的一部分,我们提出了第一原则漏洞评估(FPVA),这是一种新的以分析人员为中心的(手动)技术,旨在将分析人员的注意力集中在软件系统及其资源中最有可能包含漏洞的部分,这些漏洞将提供对高价值资产的访问。FPVA发现对系统的新威胁,而不依赖于已知威胁的列表。手动评估是劳动密集型的,使得使用自动评估工具非常有吸引力。我们将FPVA的结果与顶级商业工具的结果进行了比较,针对现实世界中已知的严重漏洞集合,对这些工具进行了首次重要的评估。虽然这些工具可以发现程序源代码中的常见问题,但它们错过了FPVA发现的大量严重漏洞。我们现在正在使用这个比较研究的结果来指导我们未来对改进自动化软件评估的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First principles vulnerability assessment
Clouds and Grids offer significant challenges to providing secure infrastructure software. As part of a our effort to secure such middleware, we present First Principles Vulnerability Assessment (FPVA), a new analyst-centric (manual) technique that aims to focus the analyst's attention on the parts of the software system and its resources that are most likely to contain vulnerabilities that would provide access to high-value assets. FPVA finds new threats to a system and is not dependent on a list of known threats. Manual assessment is labor-intensive, making the use of automated assessment tools quite attractive. We compared the results of FPVA to those of the top commercial tools, providing the first significant evaluation of these tools against a real-world known collection of serious vulnerabilities. While these tools can find common problems in a program's source code, they miss a significant number of serious vulnerabilities found by FPVA. We are now using the results of this comparison study to guide our future research into improving automated software assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Side Channels in Multi-Tenant Environments How Private is Your Private Cloud?: Security Analysis of Cloud Control Interfaces Return of the Covert Channel, Data Center Style Fast Order-Preserving Encryption from Uniform Distribution Sampling Cloud Security: The Industry Landscape and the Lure of Zero-Knowledge Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1