{"title":"电力电缆规范的决定因素","authors":"W. Bowen","doi":"10.1049/JI-2.1948.0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For electric cables, as used for indoor wiring, the only standard of reference now existing in this country is B.S.7, which covers only rubber insulants; for lack of any other specification, the dimensions therein specified for rubber compounds are being misapplied to other insulating materials, without taking into account the different properties of the latter.A new “basic specification” is proposed, composed of a series of electrical, physical, thermal, mechanical and chemical tests; and the author suggests the use of such an agreed basic specification for the determination of minimum dimensions of any approved materials of which the cable may be composed.Following out this suggestion, the author deals with such test requirements under the two headings: (a) electrical specification, which covers the primary purpose of the cable to transmit electrical power, and (b) mechanical specification, which covers the adequate protection of the cable in service.Under the electrical specification some calculations and graphs of interest are given as illustrations only of the more comprehensive survey that is necessary.The author further deals with practical and economic considerations, which may have some bearing on purely echnical conclusions, e.g.:(a) The lack of importance of eccentric insulation, provided the required minimum thickness is used.(b) The incorrectness of stipulating an average thickness with a plus and minus tolerance as against the correct method of specifying either a minimum thickness or a maximum, or both.(c) The increase of cable costs, basically as the square of the radial thicknesses imposed.In particular, the properties of pre-war rubber, reclaimed rubber, p.v.c. compounds and polythene are compared.","PeriodicalId":307627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1948-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors governing specifications for electric power cables\",\"authors\":\"W. Bowen\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/JI-2.1948.0152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For electric cables, as used for indoor wiring, the only standard of reference now existing in this country is B.S.7, which covers only rubber insulants; for lack of any other specification, the dimensions therein specified for rubber compounds are being misapplied to other insulating materials, without taking into account the different properties of the latter.A new “basic specification” is proposed, composed of a series of electrical, physical, thermal, mechanical and chemical tests; and the author suggests the use of such an agreed basic specification for the determination of minimum dimensions of any approved materials of which the cable may be composed.Following out this suggestion, the author deals with such test requirements under the two headings: (a) electrical specification, which covers the primary purpose of the cable to transmit electrical power, and (b) mechanical specification, which covers the adequate protection of the cable in service.Under the electrical specification some calculations and graphs of interest are given as illustrations only of the more comprehensive survey that is necessary.The author further deals with practical and economic considerations, which may have some bearing on purely echnical conclusions, e.g.:(a) The lack of importance of eccentric insulation, provided the required minimum thickness is used.(b) The incorrectness of stipulating an average thickness with a plus and minus tolerance as against the correct method of specifying either a minimum thickness or a maximum, or both.(c) The increase of cable costs, basically as the square of the radial thicknesses imposed.In particular, the properties of pre-war rubber, reclaimed rubber, p.v.c. compounds and polythene are compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1948-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/JI-2.1948.0152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part II: Power Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/JI-2.1948.0152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于用于室内布线的电缆,目前在该国存在的唯一参考标准是B.S.7,该标准仅涵盖橡胶绝缘体;由于缺乏任何其他规格,其中规定的橡胶化合物的尺寸被错误地应用于其他绝缘材料,而没有考虑到后者的不同性能。提出了一个新的“基本规范”,由一系列电气、物理、热、机械和化学测试组成;作者建议使用这种商定的基本规范来确定任何可制成电缆的认可材料的最小尺寸。根据这一建议,作者在两个标题下处理这些测试要求:(a)电气规范,涵盖电缆传输电力的主要目的;(b)机械规范,涵盖电缆在使用中的充分保护。在电气规范下,给出了一些计算和感兴趣的图表,仅作为必要的更全面调查的说明。作者进一步讨论了实际和经济方面的考虑,这些考虑可能对纯技术结论有一定的影响,例如:(a)如果使用所需的最小厚度,偏心绝缘就不重要了。(b)规定带有正负公差的平均厚度与规定最小或最大厚度或两者都规定的正确方法是不正确的。基本上是径向厚度的平方。特别对战前橡胶、再生橡胶、聚氯乙烯化合物和聚乙烯的性能进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors governing specifications for electric power cables
For electric cables, as used for indoor wiring, the only standard of reference now existing in this country is B.S.7, which covers only rubber insulants; for lack of any other specification, the dimensions therein specified for rubber compounds are being misapplied to other insulating materials, without taking into account the different properties of the latter.A new “basic specification” is proposed, composed of a series of electrical, physical, thermal, mechanical and chemical tests; and the author suggests the use of such an agreed basic specification for the determination of minimum dimensions of any approved materials of which the cable may be composed.Following out this suggestion, the author deals with such test requirements under the two headings: (a) electrical specification, which covers the primary purpose of the cable to transmit electrical power, and (b) mechanical specification, which covers the adequate protection of the cable in service.Under the electrical specification some calculations and graphs of interest are given as illustrations only of the more comprehensive survey that is necessary.The author further deals with practical and economic considerations, which may have some bearing on purely echnical conclusions, e.g.:(a) The lack of importance of eccentric insulation, provided the required minimum thickness is used.(b) The incorrectness of stipulating an average thickness with a plus and minus tolerance as against the correct method of specifying either a minimum thickness or a maximum, or both.(c) The increase of cable costs, basically as the square of the radial thicknesses imposed.In particular, the properties of pre-war rubber, reclaimed rubber, p.v.c. compounds and polythene are compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The flash tube and its applications Corrigendum: The predetermination of the magnetic properties of ferromagnetic laminae at power and audio frequencies The authors' replies to the discussion on "Development of locators of small metallic bodies buried in the ground" Development of locators of small metallic bodies buried in the ground Transformer economic efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1