资本获取债券:有转换选择权的或有资本

P. Bolton, F. Samama
{"title":"资本获取债券:有转换选择权的或有资本","authors":"P. Bolton, F. Samama","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0327.2012.00284.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that there is a Coasean Bargain available to banks, Long-term Investors, and Bank Regulators around a particular form of 'Contingent Capital'. By purchasing rights to issue equity in crisis events at a pre-specified price from Long-term Investors, banks can ensure that they will have sufficient regulatory capital available when they need it most: in a crisis. By selling these rights (effectively, a form of crisis insurance) long-term investors can monetize their counter-cyclical investments strategies in banks and, thus, obtain an adequate return as long-term investors. Bank Regulators, in turn, gain as they can thereby implement a more efficient form of equity-capital regulation. Banks have a special need to maintain their equity-capital base in the event of a crisis. Sovereign Wealth Funds and other long-term investors have proved to be the only available counterparties for banks in crisis times. This is why we argue that these investors must be able to monetize the countercyclical asset-management strategies they are trying to implement by obtaining a higher return on their cash reserves. The form of contingent capital we propose (Capital Access Bond) reflects a balance between investors’ preferences, issuers’ constraints, and regulators' objectives.","PeriodicalId":236508,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capital Access Bonds: Contingent Capital with an Option to Convert\",\"authors\":\"P. Bolton, F. Samama\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1468-0327.2012.00284.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that there is a Coasean Bargain available to banks, Long-term Investors, and Bank Regulators around a particular form of 'Contingent Capital'. By purchasing rights to issue equity in crisis events at a pre-specified price from Long-term Investors, banks can ensure that they will have sufficient regulatory capital available when they need it most: in a crisis. By selling these rights (effectively, a form of crisis insurance) long-term investors can monetize their counter-cyclical investments strategies in banks and, thus, obtain an adequate return as long-term investors. Bank Regulators, in turn, gain as they can thereby implement a more efficient form of equity-capital regulation. Banks have a special need to maintain their equity-capital base in the event of a crisis. Sovereign Wealth Funds and other long-term investors have proved to be the only available counterparties for banks in crisis times. This is why we argue that these investors must be able to monetize the countercyclical asset-management strategies they are trying to implement by obtaining a higher return on their cash reserves. The form of contingent capital we propose (Capital Access Bond) reflects a balance between investors’ preferences, issuers’ constraints, and regulators' objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2012.00284.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2012.00284.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

摘要

本文认为,对于银行、长期投资者和银行监管机构来说,围绕一种特定形式的“或有资本”,存在一个科斯讨价还价(Coasean Bargain)。通过向长期投资者(Long-term Investors)以预先规定的价格购买在危机事件中发行股票的权利,银行可以确保在最需要的时候——危机期间——拥有足够的监管资本。通过出售这些权利(实际上是危机保险的一种形式),长期投资者可以将他们在银行的反周期投资策略货币化,从而获得作为长期投资者的足够回报。反过来,银行监管者也会受益,因为他们可以因此实施一种更有效的股权资本监管形式。在危机发生时,银行特别需要维持其股本基础。事实证明,主权财富基金和其他长期投资者是银行在危机时期唯一可用的交易对手。这就是为什么我们认为,这些投资者必须能够通过获得更高的现金储备回报,将他们试图实施的反周期资产管理策略货币化。我们提出的或有资本形式(资本准入债券)反映了投资者偏好、发行人约束和监管机构目标之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capital Access Bonds: Contingent Capital with an Option to Convert
This paper argues that there is a Coasean Bargain available to banks, Long-term Investors, and Bank Regulators around a particular form of 'Contingent Capital'. By purchasing rights to issue equity in crisis events at a pre-specified price from Long-term Investors, banks can ensure that they will have sufficient regulatory capital available when they need it most: in a crisis. By selling these rights (effectively, a form of crisis insurance) long-term investors can monetize their counter-cyclical investments strategies in banks and, thus, obtain an adequate return as long-term investors. Bank Regulators, in turn, gain as they can thereby implement a more efficient form of equity-capital regulation. Banks have a special need to maintain their equity-capital base in the event of a crisis. Sovereign Wealth Funds and other long-term investors have proved to be the only available counterparties for banks in crisis times. This is why we argue that these investors must be able to monetize the countercyclical asset-management strategies they are trying to implement by obtaining a higher return on their cash reserves. The form of contingent capital we propose (Capital Access Bond) reflects a balance between investors’ preferences, issuers’ constraints, and regulators' objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unemployment at Risk: The Policy Determinants of Labour Market Exposure to Economic Shocks School and Family Effects on Educational Outcomes Across Countries Evaluating the Cost of Government Credit Support: The OECD Context Public Policy and Resource Allocation: Evidence from Firms in OECD Countries Defying Gravity: Can Japanese Sovereign Debt Continue to Increase Without a Crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1