{"title":"如何不被看到:日常可穿戴技术设计中的隐私和安全考虑","authors":"Helen Oliver, Richard Mortier","doi":"10.1049/icp.2021.2424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and scope of the study From 2017 to 2020, we conducted a research through design to address a number of identified obstacles to adoption of wearable computing. One obstacle was a perceived failure to design wearables for emotional engagement [1] [2] [3]. To address this, we began the inspiration phase with a participatory design process with an open-ended brief, instead of the typical approach of starting with a design exemplar. In this way, we elicited concepts from the participants to discover what kinds of everyday wearables they desired [4], rather than their preferences for some particular device type like an activity monitor [5]. The obstacles interrelate, and the outcome of our investigations against the obstacle of poor emotional engagement, give cause to reflect on another of the obstacles: privacy. This paper will reflect on the privacy issues evoked by our experience.","PeriodicalId":254750,"journal":{"name":"Competitive Advantage in the Digital Economy (CADE 2021)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Not To Be Seen: Privacy and Security Considerations in the Design of Everyday Wearable Technology\",\"authors\":\"Helen Oliver, Richard Mortier\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/icp.2021.2424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim and scope of the study From 2017 to 2020, we conducted a research through design to address a number of identified obstacles to adoption of wearable computing. One obstacle was a perceived failure to design wearables for emotional engagement [1] [2] [3]. To address this, we began the inspiration phase with a participatory design process with an open-ended brief, instead of the typical approach of starting with a design exemplar. In this way, we elicited concepts from the participants to discover what kinds of everyday wearables they desired [4], rather than their preferences for some particular device type like an activity monitor [5]. The obstacles interrelate, and the outcome of our investigations against the obstacle of poor emotional engagement, give cause to reflect on another of the obstacles: privacy. This paper will reflect on the privacy issues evoked by our experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competitive Advantage in the Digital Economy (CADE 2021)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competitive Advantage in the Digital Economy (CADE 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.2424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competitive Advantage in the Digital Economy (CADE 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.2424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Not To Be Seen: Privacy and Security Considerations in the Design of Everyday Wearable Technology
Aim and scope of the study From 2017 to 2020, we conducted a research through design to address a number of identified obstacles to adoption of wearable computing. One obstacle was a perceived failure to design wearables for emotional engagement [1] [2] [3]. To address this, we began the inspiration phase with a participatory design process with an open-ended brief, instead of the typical approach of starting with a design exemplar. In this way, we elicited concepts from the participants to discover what kinds of everyday wearables they desired [4], rather than their preferences for some particular device type like an activity monitor [5]. The obstacles interrelate, and the outcome of our investigations against the obstacle of poor emotional engagement, give cause to reflect on another of the obstacles: privacy. This paper will reflect on the privacy issues evoked by our experience.